ML-EcoLyzer: Quantifying the Environmental Cost of Machine Learning Inference Across Frameworks and Hardware

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.06694v1
• Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2025 04:30:29 GMT
• Title: ML-EcoLyzer: Quantifying the Environmental Cost of Machine Learning Inference Across Frameworks and Hardware
• Authors: Jose Marie Antonio Minoza, Rex Gregor Laylo, Christian F Villarin, Sebastian C. Ibanez,
• Abstract summary: We present ML-EcoLyzer, a tool for measuring the carbon, energy, thermal, and water costs of machine learning inference.<n>The tool supports both classical and modern models, applying adaptive monitoring and hardware-aware evaluation.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Machine learning inference occurs at a massive scale, yet its environmental impact remains poorly quantified, especially on low-resource hardware. We present ML-EcoLyzer, a cross-framework tool for measuring the carbon, energy, thermal, and water costs of inference across CPUs, consumer GPUs, and datacenter accelerators. The tool supports both classical and modern models, applying adaptive monitoring and hardware-aware evaluation. We introduce the Environmental Sustainability Score (ESS), which quantifies the number of effective parameters served per gram of CO$_2$ emitted. Our evaluation covers over 1,900 inference configurations, spanning diverse model architectures, task modalities (text, vision, audio, tabular), hardware types, and precision levels. These rigorous and reliable measurements demonstrate that quantization enhances ESS, huge accelerators can be inefficient for lightweight applications, and even small models may incur significant costs when implemented suboptimally. ML-EcoLyzer sets a standard for sustainability-conscious model selection and offers an extensive empirical evaluation of environmental costs during inference.

Related papers

• AI-CARE: Carbon-Aware Reporting Evaluation Metric for AI Models [2.7946918847372277]
  We propose AI-CARE, an evaluation tool for reporting energy consumption, and carbon emissions of machine learning models.<n>We demonstrate, through theoretical analysis and empirical validation, that carbon-aware benchmarking changes the relative ranking of models.<n>Our proposal aims to shift the research community toward transparent, multi-objective evaluation and align ML progress with global sustainability goals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-17T21:52:48Z)
• Harnessing On-Device Large Language Model: Empirical Results and Implications for AI PC [8.837470787975308]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) on edge devices offer significant privacy benefits.<n>These on-device LLMs inherently face performance limitations due to reduced model capacity and necessary compression techniques.<n>We introduce a systematic methodology -- encompassing model capability, development efficiency, and system resources -- for evaluating on-device LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T02:23:01Z)
• Sustainable LLM Inference for Edge AI: Evaluating Quantized LLMs for Energy Efficiency, Output Accuracy, and Inference Latency [6.306413686006502]
  We conduct a comprehensive analysis of 28 quantized Large Language Models (LLMs) from the Ollama library.<n>We evaluate energy efficiency, inference performance, and output accuracy across multiple quantization levels and task types.<n>Our findings reveal the trade-offs between energy efficiency, inference speed, and accuracy in different quantization settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-04T11:29:30Z)
• QuartDepth: Post-Training Quantization for Real-Time Depth Estimation on the Edge [55.75103034526652]
  We propose QuartDepth which adopts post-training quantization to quantize MDE models with hardware accelerations for ASICs.<n>Our approach involves quantizing both weights and activations to 4-bit precision, reducing the model size and computation cost.<n>We design a flexible and programmable hardware accelerator by supporting kernel fusion and customized instruction programmability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-20T21:03:10Z)
• Sometimes Painful but Certainly Promising: Feasibility and Trade-offs of Language Model Inference at the Edge [3.1471494780647795]
  Recent trends show a growing focus on compact models-typically under 10 billion parameters-enabled by techniques such as quantization.<n>This shift paves the way for LMs on edge devices, offering potential benefits such as enhanced privacy, reduced latency, and improved data sovereignty.<n>We present a comprehensive evaluation of generative LM inference on representative CPU-based and GPU-accelerated edge devices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-12T07:01:34Z)
• Every FLOP Counts: Scaling a 300B Mixture-of-Experts LING LLM without Premium GPUs [96.68469559192846]
  We present two differently sized MoE large language models (LLMs)<n>Ling-Lite contains 16.8 billion parameters with 2.75 billion activated parameters, while Ling-Plus boasts 290 billion parameters with 28.8 billion activated parameters.<n>We propose innovative methods for (1) optimization of model architecture and training processes, (2) refinement of training anomaly handling, and (3) enhancement of model evaluation efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-07T04:43:39Z)
• Computing Within Limits: An Empirical Study of Energy Consumption in ML Training and Inference [2.553456266022126]
  Machine learning (ML) has seen tremendous advancements, but its environmental footprint remains a concern. Acknowledging the growing environmental impact of ML this paper investigates Green ML.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T13:59:34Z)
• LLMC: Benchmarking Large Language Model Quantization with a Versatile Compression Toolkit [55.73370804397226]
  Quantization, a key compression technique, can effectively mitigate these demands by compressing and accelerating large language models. We present LLMC, a plug-and-play compression toolkit, to fairly and systematically explore the impact of quantization. Powered by this versatile toolkit, our benchmark covers three key aspects: calibration data, algorithms (three strategies), and data formats.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-09T11:49:05Z)
• Power Hungry Processing: Watts Driving the Cost of AI Deployment? [74.19749699665216]
  generative, multi-purpose AI systems promise a unified approach to building machine learning (ML) models into technology. This ambition of generality'' comes at a steep cost to the environment, given the amount of energy these systems require and the amount of carbon that they emit. We measure deployment cost as the amount of energy and carbon required to perform 1,000 inferences on representative benchmark dataset using these models. We conclude with a discussion around the current trend of deploying multi-purpose generative ML systems, and caution that their utility should be more intentionally weighed against increased costs in terms of energy and emissions
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-28T15:09:36Z)
• A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Algorithms for Anomaly Detection in Industrial Environments: Performance and Environmental Impact [62.997667081978825]
  This study seeks to address the demands of high-performance machine learning models with environmental sustainability. Traditional machine learning algorithms, such as Decision Trees and Random Forests, demonstrate robust efficiency and performance. However, superior outcomes were obtained with optimised configurations, albeit with a commensurate increase in resource consumption.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-01T15:18:00Z)
• Cheaply Evaluating Inference Efficiency Metrics for Autoregressive Transformer APIs [66.30706841821123]
  Large language models (LLMs) power many state-of-the-art systems in natural language processing. LLMs are extremely computationally expensive, even at inference time. We propose a new metric for comparing inference efficiency across models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-03T21:51:42Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.