A Four-Level Ontological Framework for Quantum Field Theory: From Quantum Vacuum to Phenomenal Reality
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.07476v1
- Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 01:01:14 GMT
- Title: A Four-Level Ontological Framework for Quantum Field Theory: From Quantum Vacuum to Phenomenal Reality
- Authors: Ali Reza Mirzaee,
- Abstract summary: We propose a four-level ontological hierarchy that spans from the quantum vacuum and the virtual level to the quantum level and phenomenal reality.<n>In Quantum Field Theory, virtual particles play a crucial role in mediating forces and in correcting the measurable properties of real particles.<n>This raises deep ontological questions: if unobservable entities affect measurable phenomena, can they truly be dismissed as unreal? Conversely, if they are real, what mode of existence do they possess?
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: One of the foundational challenges in both Quantum Field Theory and the philosophy of physics lies in the traditional binary classification of entities as either real or unreal. The classical view posits that material entities are real, while mental constructs or theoretical entities are unreal. However, quantum phenomena such as virtual particles challenge this simplistic dichotomy. These unobservable entities, by influencing measurable phenomena, raise profound questions about the nature and modes of existence. To address this, we propose a four-level ontological hierarchy that spans from the quantum vacuum and the virtual level to the quantum level and phenomenal reality, providing a coherent continuum from potentiality to actualization. This framework not only clarifies the interpretation of quantum theory but also offers a unified perspective linking the unobservable with the observable. In QFT, virtual particles play a crucial role in mediating forces and in correcting the measurable properties of real particles. They arise within the mathematical structure of Feynman diagrams and, despite being unobservable, produce real, measurable effects such as the Lamb shift and the Casimir effect. Philosophically, this raises deep ontological questions: if unobservable entities affect measurable phenomena, can they truly be dismissed as unreal? Conversely, if they are real, what mode of existence do they possess? The traditional dichotomy of real versus unreal is thus insufficient for interpreting the ontological implications of quantum processes. To overcome these limitations, we propose a four-level ontological hierarchy.
Related papers
- Observation of Quantum Darwinism and the Origin of Classicality with Superconducting Circuits [9.09683951826704]
How can we rationalize everyday classical observations from an inherently quantum world?<n>Quantum Darwinism offers a compelling framework to explain this emergence of classicality.<n>We observe the highly structured branching quantum states that support classicality and the saturation of quantum mutual information.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-01T13:33:32Z) - Quantum Mechanical Reality: Entanglement and Decoherence [0.0]
We look into the ontology of quantum theory as distinct from that of the classical theory in the sciences.
Within this framework, theories are conceptual constructs applying to models generated in the phenomenal world within limited contexts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-22T19:08:00Z) - Perspectival Quantum Realism [0.0]
We argue that the problems identified by QBism and Quantum Pragmatism do not necessitate abandoning the ideal of representing the physical world.
We can avail ourselves of the same puzzle-solving strategies as employed by QBists and pragmatists by adopting a emphperspectival quantum realism
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-10T16:23:54Z) - Abstract interpretation, Hoare logic, and incorrectness logic for
quantum programs [6.2147758224415055]
Hoare logic, and incorrectness (or reverse Hoare) logic are powerful techniques for static analysis of computer programs.
We show that any complete quantum abstract interpretation induces a quantum Hoare logic and a quantum incorrectness logic.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-28T05:49:55Z) - Towards Noncommutative Quantum Reality [0.0]
The implications of the physical theory of quantum mechanics on the question of realism is much a subject of sustaining interest.
We give here a picture of quantum mechanics as the basic theory for nonrelativistic' particle dynamics.
The key is to fully embrace the noncommutativity of the theory and see it as a notion about the reality of physical quantities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-19T10:27:23Z) - Quantum realism: axiomatization and quantification [77.34726150561087]
We build an axiomatization for quantum realism -- a notion of realism compatible with quantum theory.
We explicitly construct some classes of entropic quantifiers that are shown to satisfy almost all of the proposed axioms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-10T18:08:42Z) - Ruling out real-valued standard formalism of quantum theory [19.015836913247288]
A quantum game has been developed to distinguish standard quantum theory from its real-number analog.
We experimentally implement the quantum game based on entanglement swapping with a state-of-the-art fidelity of 0.952(1).
Our results disprove the real-number formulation and establish the indispensable role of complex numbers in the standard quantum theory.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-15T03:56:13Z) - Resource theory of imaginarity: Quantification and state conversion [48.7576911714538]
Resource theory of imaginarity has been introduced, allowing for a systematic study of complex numbers in quantum mechanics and quantum information theory.
We investigate imaginarity quantification, focusing on the geometric imaginarity and the robustness of imaginarity, and apply these tools to the state conversion problem in imaginarity theory.
Our study reveals the significance of complex numbers in quantum physics, and proves that imaginarity is a resource in optical experiments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-02T15:30:27Z) - Quantization of Reality, another Epistemological Interpretation of
Quantum Mechanics? [0.0]
The interpretation of quantum mechanics is still in an unacceptable status.
For the sake of human curiosity and to get a better understanding of the universe we are living in, this attitude should be changed.
A possibly interesting new approach is outlined in this article, which may help adjust the focus.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-07T15:41:26Z) - Operational Resource Theory of Imaginarity [48.7576911714538]
We show that quantum states are easier to create and manipulate if they only have real elements.
As an application, we show that imaginarity plays a crucial role for state discrimination.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-29T14:03:38Z) - Quantum Hall phase emerging in an array of atoms interacting with
photons [101.18253437732933]
Topological quantum phases underpin many concepts of modern physics.
Here, we reveal that the quantum Hall phase with topological edge states, spectral Landau levels and Hofstadter butterfly can emerge in a simple quantum system.
Such systems, arrays of two-level atoms (qubits) coupled to light being described by the classical Dicke model, have recently been realized in experiments with cold atoms and superconducting qubits.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-18T14:56:39Z) - The Existence and Role of Quantum-State Noise [51.56484100374058]
Key observation about quantum reality is that it often appears as if, at some moment, the probability of a quantum event becomes a definite outcome for us.<n>A careful analysis suggests, however, that what we perceive as a definite state -- the observed outcome of a quantum experiment -- is not strictly definite.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2010-05-02T09:33:09Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.