Shadows in the Code: Exploring the Risks and Defenses of LLM-based Multi-Agent Software Development Systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.18467v1
• Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2025 14:26:35 GMT
• Title: Shadows in the Code: Exploring the Risks and Defenses of LLM-based Multi-Agent Software Development Systems
• Authors: Xiaoqing Wang, Keman Huang, Bin Liang, Hongyu Li, Xiaoyong Du,
• Abstract summary: We identify two risky scenarios: Malicious User with Benign Agents (MU-BA) and Benign User with Malicious Agents (BU-MA)<n>We introduce the Implicit Malicious Behavior Injection Attack (IMBIA) demonstrating how multi-agent systems can be manipulated to generate software with concealed malicious capabilities beneath seemingly benign applications.<n>Our findings highlight the urgent need for robust security measures in multi-agent software development systems.
• Score: 15.276177828252829
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The rapid advancement of Large Language Model (LLM)-driven multi-agent systems has significantly streamlined software developing tasks, enabling users with little technical expertise to develop executable applications. While these systems democratize software creation through natural language requirements, they introduce significant security risks that remain largely unexplored. We identify two risky scenarios: Malicious User with Benign Agents (MU-BA) and Benign User with Malicious Agents (BU-MA). We introduce the Implicit Malicious Behavior Injection Attack (IMBIA), demonstrating how multi-agent systems can be manipulated to generate software with concealed malicious capabilities beneath seemingly benign applications, and propose Adv-IMBIA as a defense mechanism. Evaluations across ChatDev, MetaGPT, and AgentVerse frameworks reveal varying vulnerability patterns, with IMBIA achieving attack success rates of 93%, 45%, and 71% in MU-BA scenarios, and 71%, 84%, and 45% in BU-MA scenarios. Our defense mechanism reduced attack success rates significantly, particularly in the MU-BA scenario. Further analysis reveals that compromised agents in the coding and testing phases pose significantly greater security risks, while also identifying critical agents that require protection against malicious user exploitation. Our findings highlight the urgent need for robust security measures in multi-agent software development systems and provide practical guidelines for implementing targeted, resource-efficient defensive strategies.

Related papers

• OMNI-LEAK: Orchestrator Multi-Agent Network Induced Data Leakage [59.3826294523924]
  We investigate the security vulnerabilities of a popular multi-agent pattern known as the orchestrator setup.<n>We report the susceptibility of frontier models to different categories of attacks, finding that both reasoning and non-reasoning models are vulnerable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-13T21:32:32Z)
• Analyzing Code Injection Attacks on LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems in Software Development [11.76638109321532]
  We propose an architecture of a multi-agent system for the implementation phase of the software engineering process.<n>We demonstrate that while such systems can generate code quite accurately, they are vulnerable to attacks, including code injection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-26T01:08:43Z)
• Exposing Weak Links in Multi-Agent Systems under Adversarial Prompting [5.544819942438653]
  We present SafeAgents, a framework for fine-grained security assessment of multi-agent systems.<n>We conduct a study across five widely adopted multi-agent architectures.<n>Our findings reveal that common design patterns carry significant vulnerabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-14T04:22:49Z)
• RedCodeAgent: Automatic Red-teaming Agent against Diverse Code Agents [70.24175620901538]
  Code agents have gained widespread adoption due to their strong code generation capabilities and integration with code interpreters.<n>Current static safety benchmarks and red-teaming tools are inadequate for identifying emerging real-world risky scenarios.<n>We propose RedCodeAgent, the first automated red-teaming agent designed to systematically uncover vulnerabilities in diverse code agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-02T22:59:06Z)
• Bridging AI and Software Security: A Comparative Vulnerability Assessment of LLM Agent Deployment Paradigms [1.03121181235382]
  Large Language Model (LLM) agents face security vulnerabilities spanning AI-specific and traditional software domains.<n>This study bridges this gap through comparative evaluation of Function Calling architecture and Model Context Protocol (MCP) deployment paradigms.<n>We tested 3,250 attack scenarios across seven language models, evaluating simple, composed, and chained attacks targeting both AI-specific threats and software vulnerabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-08T18:24:28Z)
• OpenAgentSafety: A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluating Real-World AI Agent Safety [58.201189860217724]
  We introduce OpenAgentSafety, a comprehensive framework for evaluating agent behavior across eight critical risk categories.<n>Unlike prior work, our framework evaluates agents that interact with real tools, including web browsers, code execution environments, file systems, bash shells, and messaging platforms.<n>It combines rule-based analysis with LLM-as-judge assessments to detect both overt and subtle unsafe behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-08T16:18:54Z)
• SafeMobile: Chain-level Jailbreak Detection and Automated Evaluation for Multimodal Mobile Agents [58.21223208538351]
  This work explores the security issues surrounding mobile multimodal agents.<n>It attempts to construct a risk discrimination mechanism by incorporating behavioral sequence information.<n>It also designs an automated assisted assessment scheme based on a large language model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-01T15:10:00Z)
• LLM Agents Should Employ Security Principles [60.03651084139836]
  This paper argues that the well-established design principles in information security should be employed when deploying Large Language Model (LLM) agents at scale.<n>We introduce AgentSandbox, a conceptual framework embedding these security principles to provide safeguards throughout an agent's life-cycle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T21:39:08Z)
• AgentVigil: Generic Black-Box Red-teaming for Indirect Prompt Injection against LLM Agents [54.29555239363013]
  We propose a generic black-box fuzzing framework, AgentVigil, to automatically discover and exploit indirect prompt injection vulnerabilities.<n>We evaluate AgentVigil on two public benchmarks, AgentDojo and VWA-adv, where it achieves 71% and 70% success rates against agents based on o3-mini and GPT-4o.<n>We apply our attacks in real-world environments, successfully misleading agents to navigate to arbitrary URLs, including malicious sites.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-09T07:40:17Z)
• Guardians of the Agentic System: Preventing Many Shots Jailbreak with Agentic System [0.8136541584281987]
  This work uses three examination methods to detect rogue agents through a Reverse Turing Test and analyze deceptive alignment through multi-agent simulations.<n>We develop an anti-jailbreaking system by testing it with GEMINI 1.5 pro and llama-3.3-70B, deepseek r1 models.<n>The detection capabilities are strong such as 94% accuracy for GEMINI 1.5 pro yet the system suffers persistent vulnerabilities when under long attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-23T23:35:15Z)
• Can We Trust Embodied Agents? Exploring Backdoor Attacks against Embodied LLM-based Decision-Making Systems [27.316115171846953]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown significant promise in real-world decision-making tasks for embodied AI.<n>LLMs are fine-tuned to leverage their inherent common sense and reasoning abilities while being tailored to specific applications.<n>This fine-tuning process introduces considerable safety and security vulnerabilities, especially in safety-critical cyber-physical systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-27T17:59:43Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.