On Evolution-Based Models for Experimentation Under Interference

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.21675v1
• Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2025 18:53:46 GMT
• Title: On Evolution-Based Models for Experimentation Under Interference
• Authors: Sadegh Shirani, Mohsen Bayati,
• Abstract summary: We study an evolution-based approach that investigates how outcomes change across observation rounds in response to interventions.<n>We highlight causal message passing as an instantiation of this method in dense networks.<n>We discuss the limits of this approach, showing that strong temporal trends or endogenous interference can undermine identification.
• Score: 7.262048441360133
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Causal effect estimation in networked systems is central to data-driven decision making. In such settings, interventions on one unit can spill over to others, and in complex physical or social systems, the interaction pathways driving these interference structures remain largely unobserved. We argue that for identifying population-level causal effects, it is not necessary to recover the exact network structure; instead, it suffices to characterize how those interactions contribute to the evolution of outcomes. Building on this principle, we study an evolution-based approach that investigates how outcomes change across observation rounds in response to interventions, hence compensating for missing network information. Using an exposure-mapping perspective, we give an axiomatic characterization of when the empirical distribution of outcomes follows a low-dimensional recursive equation, and identify minimal structural conditions under which such evolution mappings exist. We frame this as a distributional counterpart to difference-in-differences. Rather than assuming parallel paths for individual units, it exploits parallel evolution patterns across treatment scenarios to estimate counterfactual trajectories. A key insight is that treatment randomization plays a role beyond eliminating latent confounding; it induces an implicit sampling from hidden interference channels, enabling consistent learning about heterogeneous spillover effects. We highlight causal message passing as an instantiation of this method in dense networks while extending to more general interference structures, including influencer networks where a small set of units drives most spillovers. Finally, we discuss the limits of this approach, showing that strong temporal trends or endogenous interference can undermine identification.

Related papers

• Causal Inference on Networks under Misspecified Exposure Mappings: A Partial Identification Framework [66.59051888063665]
  We propose a novel partial identification framework for causal inference on networks.<n>We derive sharp upper and lower bounds on direct and spillover effects under misspecifications of the exposure mapping.<n>Our experiments show the bounds remain informative and provide reliable conclusions under misspecification of exposure mappings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-03T12:27:11Z)
• Estimating Treatment Effects in Networks using Domain Adversarial Training [4.664495510551647]
  Estimating heterogeneous treatment effects in network settings is complicated by interference.<n>We propose HINet, a novel method that integrates graph neural networks with domain adversarial training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-24T13:34:43Z)
• Estimating Heterogeneous Causal Effect on Networks via Orthogonal Learning [8.45884756677776]
  Estimating causal effects on networks is important for scientific research and practical applications.<n>We propose a two-stage method to estimate heterogeneous direct and spillover effects on networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-23T00:41:04Z)
• Can We Validate Counterfactual Estimations in the Presence of General Network Interference? [13.49152464081862]
  We introduce a framework that facilitates the use of machine learning tools for both estimation and validation in causal inference.<n>New distribution-preserving network bootstrap generates statistically-valid subpopulations from a single experiment's data.<n>Counterfactual cross-validation procedure adapts the principles of model validation to the unique constraints of causal settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-03T06:51:04Z)
• Online Experimental Design With Estimation-Regret Trade-off Under Network Interference [7.080131271060764]
  We introduce a unified interference-aware framework for online experimental design.<n>Compared to existing studies, we extend the definition of arm space by utilizing the statistical concept of exposure mapping.<n>We also propose an algorithmic implementation and discuss its generalization across different learning settings and network topology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-04T21:45:35Z)
• Network Causal Effect Estimation In Graphical Models Of Contagion And Latent Confounding [2.654975444537834]
  Key question in many network studies is whether the observed correlations between units are primarily due to contagion or latent confounding.<n>We propose network causal effect estimation strategies that provide unbiased and consistent estimates.<n>We evaluate the effectiveness of our methods with synthetic data and the validity of our assumptions using real-world networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-02T22:12:44Z)
• Causal Message Passing for Experiments with Unknown and General Network Interference [5.294604210205507]
  We introduce a new framework to accommodate complex and unknown network interference. Our framework, termed causal message-passing, is grounded in high-dimensional approximate message passing methodology. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach across five numerical scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-14T17:31:50Z)
• Hierarchical Graph Neural Networks for Causal Discovery and Root Cause Localization [52.72490784720227]
  REASON consists of Topological Causal Discovery and Individual Causal Discovery. The Topological Causal Discovery component aims to model the fault propagation in order to trace back to the root causes. The Individual Causal Discovery component focuses on capturing abrupt change patterns of a single system entity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-03T20:17:45Z)
• Neighborhood Adaptive Estimators for Causal Inference under Network Interference [109.17155002599978]
  We consider the violation of the classical no-interference assumption with units connected by a network.<n>For tractability, we consider a known network that describes how interference may spread.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-07T14:53:47Z)
• Learning Neural Causal Models with Active Interventions [83.44636110899742]
  We introduce an active intervention-targeting mechanism which enables a quick identification of the underlying causal structure of the data-generating process. Our method significantly reduces the required number of interactions compared with random intervention targeting. We demonstrate superior performance on multiple benchmarks from simulated to real-world data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-06T13:10:37Z)
• Causal Discovery in Physical Systems from Videos [123.79211190669821]
  Causal discovery is at the core of human cognition. We consider the task of causal discovery from videos in an end-to-end fashion without supervision on the ground-truth graph structure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-01T17:29:57Z)
• Interference and Generalization in Temporal Difference Learning [86.31598155056035]
  We study the link between generalization and interference in temporal-difference (TD) learning. We find that TD easily leads to low-interference, under-generalizing parameters, while the effect seems reversed in supervised learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-13T15:49:58Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.