Causal Inference on Networks under Misspecified Exposure Mappings: A Partial Identification Framework

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.03459v1
• Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2026 12:27:11 GMT
• Title: Causal Inference on Networks under Misspecified Exposure Mappings: A Partial Identification Framework
• Authors: Maresa Schröder, Miruna Oprescu, Stefan Feuerriegel, Nathan Kallus,
• Abstract summary: We propose a novel partial identification framework for causal inference on networks.<n>We derive sharp upper and lower bounds on direct and spillover effects under misspecifications of the exposure mapping.<n>Our experiments show the bounds remain informative and provide reliable conclusions under misspecification of exposure mappings.
• Score: 66.59051888063665
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Estimating treatment effects in networks is challenging, as each potential outcome depends on the treatments of all other nodes in the network. To overcome this difficulty, existing methods typically impose an exposure mapping that compresses the treatment assignments in the network into a low-dimensional summary. However, if this mapping is misspecified, standard estimators for direct and spillover effects can be severely biased. We propose a novel partial identification framework for causal inference on networks to assess the robustness of treatment effects under misspecifications of the exposure mapping. Specifically, we derive sharp upper and lower bounds on direct and spillover effects under such misspecifications. As such, our framework presents a novel application of causal sensitivity analysis to exposure mappings. We instantiate our framework for three canonical exposure settings widely used in practice: (i) weighted means of the neighborhood treatments, (ii) threshold-based exposure mappings, and (iii) truncated neighborhood interference in the presence of higher-order spillovers. Furthermore, we develop orthogonal estimators for these bounds and prove that the resulting bound estimates are valid, sharp, and efficient. Our experiments show the bounds remain informative and provide reliable conclusions under misspecification of exposure mappings.

Related papers

• Decomposition of Spillover Effects Under Misspecification:Pseudo-true Estimands and a Local--Global Extension [4.147806823365401]
  We take as primitive the marginal policy effect, defined as the effect of a small change in the treatment probability under the actual design.<n>We show that any researcher-chosen exposure mapping induces a unique pseudo-true outcome model.<n>We then focus on a setting that nests important empirical and theoretical applications in which both local network spillovers and global spillovers operate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-12T14:54:28Z)
• The Eminence in Shadow: Exploiting Feature Boundary Ambiguity for Robust Backdoor Attacks [51.468144272905135]
  Deep neural networks (DNNs) underpin critical applications yet remain vulnerable to backdoor attacks.<n>We provide a theoretical analysis targeting backdoor attacks, focusing on how sparse decision boundaries enable disproportionate model manipulation.<n>We propose Eminence, an explainable and robust black-box backdoor framework with provable theoretical guarantees and inherent stealth properties.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-11T08:09:07Z)
• On Evolution-Based Models for Experimentation Under Interference [7.262048441360133]
  We study an evolution-based approach that investigates how outcomes change across observation rounds in response to interventions.<n>We highlight causal message passing as an instantiation of this method in dense networks.<n>We discuss the limits of this approach, showing that strong temporal trends or endogenous interference can undermine identification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-26T18:53:46Z)
• Estimating Treatment Effects in Networks using Domain Adversarial Training [4.664495510551647]
  Estimating heterogeneous treatment effects in network settings is complicated by interference.<n>We propose HINet, a novel method that integrates graph neural networks with domain adversarial training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-24T13:34:43Z)
• Bayesian Estimation of Causal Effects Using Proxies of a Latent Interference Network [0.39462888523270856]
  Network interference occurs when treatments assigned to some units affect the outcomes of others.<n>Traditional approaches often assume that the observed network correctly specifies the interference structure.<n>We introduce a framework for estimating causal effects when only proxy networks are available.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-13T09:46:30Z)
• Proximal Inference on Population Intervention Indirect Effect [8.296034406842345]
  Population intervention indirect effect (PIIE) is a novel mediation effect representing the indirect component of the population intervention effect.<n>This paper proposes a novel PIIE identification framework in settings where unmeasured confounders influence exposure-outcome, exposure-mediator, and mediator-outcome relationships.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-16T08:14:55Z)
• Causal Message Passing for Experiments with Unknown and General Network Interference [5.294604210205507]
  We introduce a new framework to accommodate complex and unknown network interference. Our framework, termed causal message-passing, is grounded in high-dimensional approximate message passing methodology. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach across five numerical scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-14T17:31:50Z)
• DARE: Towards Robust Text Explanations in Biomedical and Healthcare Applications [54.93807822347193]
  We show how to adapt attribution robustness estimation methods to a given domain, so as to take into account domain-specific plausibility. Next, we provide two methods, adversarial training and FAR training, to mitigate the brittleness characterized by DARE. Finally, we empirically validate our methods with extensive experiments on three established biomedical benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-05T08:11:40Z)
• Neighborhood Adaptive Estimators for Causal Inference under Network Interference [109.17155002599978]
  We consider the violation of the classical no-interference assumption with units connected by a network.<n>For tractability, we consider a known network that describes how interference may spread.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-07T14:53:47Z)
• Deconfounding Scores: Feature Representations for Causal Effect Estimation with Weak Overlap [140.98628848491146]
  We introduce deconfounding scores, which induce better overlap without biasing the target of estimation. We show that deconfounding scores satisfy a zero-covariance condition that is identifiable in observed data. In particular, we show that this technique could be an attractive alternative to standard regularizations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-12T18:50:11Z)
• Almost-Matching-Exactly for Treatment Effect Estimation under Network Interference [73.23326654892963]
  We propose a matching method that recovers direct treatment effects from randomized experiments where units are connected in an observed network. Our method matches units almost exactly on counts of unique subgraphs within their neighborhood graphs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-02T15:21:20Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.