SynthStrategy: Extracting and Formalizing Latent Strategic Insights from LLMs in Organic Chemistry
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.01507v1
- Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2025 10:33:00 GMT
- Title: SynthStrategy: Extracting and Formalizing Latent Strategic Insights from LLMs in Organic Chemistry
- Authors: Daniel Armstrong, Zlatko JonĨev, Andres M Bran, Philippe Schwaller,
- Abstract summary: We introduce a methodology that leverages Large Language Models to distill synthetic knowledge into code.<n>Our system analyzes synthesis routes and translates strategic principles into Python functions representing diverse strategic and tactical rules.<n>This work bridges the tactical-strategic divide in CASP, enabling specification, search, and evaluation of routes by strategic criteria.
- Score: 4.220916808049659
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Modern computer-assisted synthesis planning (CASP) systems show promises at generating chemically valid reaction steps but struggle to incorporate strategic considerations such as convergent assembly, protecting group minimization, and optimal ring-forming sequences. We introduce a methodology that leverages Large Language Models to distill synthetic knowledge into code. Our system analyzes synthesis routes and translates strategic principles into Python functions representing diverse strategic and tactical rules, such as strategic functional group interconversions and ring construction strategies. By formalizing this knowledge as verifiable code rather than simple heuristics, we create testable, interpretable representations of synthetic strategy. We release the complete codebase and the USPTO-ST dataset -- synthesis routes annotated with strategic tags. This framework unlocks a novel capability for CASP: natural language-based route retrieval, achieving 75\% Top-3 accuracy on our benchmark. We further validate our library through temporal analysis of historical trends and chemically intuitive route clustering that offers more granular partitioning than common previous methods. This work bridges the tactical-strategic divide in CASP, enabling specification, search, and evaluation of routes by strategic criteria rather than structure alone.
Related papers
- Expanding LLM Agent Boundaries with Strategy-Guided Exploration [51.98616048282804]
Reinforcement learning (RL) has demonstrated notable success in post-training large language models (LLMs) as agents for tasks such as computer use, tool calling, and coding.<n>We propose Strategy-Guided Exploration (SGE) to shift exploration from low-level actions to higher-level language strategies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-02T16:28:39Z) - Strategy Executability in Mathematical Reasoning: Leveraging Human-Model Differences for Effective Guidance [86.46794021499511]
We show a previously underexplored gap between strategy usage and strategy executability.<n>We propose Selective Strategy Retrieval (SSR), a test-time framework that explicitly models executability.<n> SSR yields reliable and consistent improvements over direct solving, in-context learning, and single-source guidance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-26T03:34:23Z) - Chained Prompting for Better Systematic Review Search Strategies [0.6633201258809686]
We introduce a Large Language Model-based chained prompt engineering framework for the automated development of search strategies in systematic reviews.<n>The framework replicates the procedural structure of manual search design while leveraging LLMs to decompose review objectives, extract and PICO elements, generate conceptual representations, expand terminologies, and synthesize queries.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-28T12:12:38Z) - Experience-Guided Adaptation of Inference-Time Reasoning Strategies [49.954515048847874]
Experience-Guided Reasoner (EGuR) generates tailored strategies at inference time based on accumulated experience.<n>EGuR achieves up to 14% accuracy improvements over the strongest baselines while reducing computational costs by up to 111x.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-14T17:45:28Z) - Reinforced Strategy Optimization for Conversational Recommender Systems via Network-of-Experts [63.412646471177645]
We propose a novel Reinforced Strategy Optimization (RSO) method for Conversational Recommender Systems (CRSs)<n>RSO decomposes the process of generating strategy-driven response decisions into the macro-level strategy planning and micro-level strategy adaptation.<n>Experiments show that RSO significantly improves interaction performance compared to state-of-the-art baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-30T11:12:01Z) - Plan before Solving: Problem-Aware Strategy Routing for Mathematical Reasoning with LLMs [49.995906301946]
Existing methods usually leverage a fixed strategy to guide Large Language Models (LLMs) to perform mathematical reasoning.<n>Our analysis reveals that the single strategy cannot adapt to problem-specific requirements and thus overlooks the trade-off between effectiveness and efficiency.<n>We propose Planning and Routing through Instance-Specific Modeling (PRISM), a novel framework that decouples mathematical reasoning into two stages: strategy planning and targeted execution.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-29T07:22:41Z) - Simplicity Lies in the Eye of the Beholder: A Strategic Perspective on Controllers in Reactive Synthesis [0.5156484100374059]
This contribution focuses on the complexity of strategies in a variety of contexts.<n>We discuss recent results concerning memory and randomness, and take a brief look at what lies beyond our traditional notions of complexity for strategies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-04T11:54:19Z) - Rethinking Testing for LLM Applications: Characteristics, Challenges, and a Lightweight Interaction Protocol [83.83217247686402]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have evolved from simple text generators into complex software systems that integrate retrieval augmentation, tool invocation, and multi-turn interactions.<n>Their inherent non-determinism, dynamism, and context dependence pose fundamental challenges for quality assurance.<n>This paper decomposes LLM applications into a three-layer architecture: textbftextitSystem Shell Layer, textbftextitPrompt Orchestration Layer, and textbftextitLLM Inference Core.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-28T13:00:28Z) - Strategy-Augmented Planning for Large Language Models via Opponent Exploitation [11.840105106884543]
We introduce a two-stage Strategy-Augmented Planning (SAP) framework that significantly enhances the opponent exploitation capabilities of LLM-based agents.<n>In the offline stage, we construct an explicit strategy space and subsequently collect strategy-outcome pair data for training the Strategy Evaluation Network (SEN)<n>During the online phase, SAP dynamically recognizes the opponent's strategies and greedily exploits them by searching best response strategy on the well-trained SEN.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-13T11:41:10Z) - EPO: Explicit Policy Optimization for Strategic Reasoning in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning [69.55982246413046]
We propose explicit policy optimization (EPO) for strategic reasoning.<n>We train the strategic reasoning model via multi-turn reinforcement learning (RL),utilizing process rewards and iterative self-play.<n>Our findings reveal various collaborative reasoning mechanisms emergent in EPO and its effectiveness in generating novel strategies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-18T03:15:55Z) - Recommending Actionable Strategies: A Semantic Approach to Integrating Analytical Frameworks with Decision Heuristics [0.0]
We present a novel approach for recommending actionable strategies by integrating strategic frameworks with decisions through semantic analysis.<n>Our methodology bridges this gap using advanced natural language processing (NLP), demonstrated through integrating frameworks like the 6C model with the Thirty-Six Stratagems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-24T16:53:37Z) - K-Level Reasoning: Establishing Higher Order Beliefs in Large Language Models for Strategic Reasoning [76.3114831562989]
It requires Large Language Model (LLM) agents to adapt their strategies dynamically in multi-agent environments.
We propose a novel framework: "K-Level Reasoning with Large Language Models (K-R)"
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-02T16:07:05Z) - Logic-Q: Improving Deep Reinforcement Learning-based Quantitative Trading via Program Sketch-based Tuning [9.039809980024852]
We propose a universal logic-guided deep reinforcement learning framework for Q-trading, called Logic-Q.<n>In particular, Logic-Q adopts the program synthesis by sketching paradigm and introduces a logic-guided model design that leverages a lightweight, plug-and-play market trend-aware program sketch to determine the market trend.<n>Extensive evaluations of two popular quantitative trading tasks demonstrate that Logic-Q can significantly improve the performance of previous state-of-the-art DRL trading strategies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-09T09:20:13Z) - Exploration Policies for On-the-Fly Controller Synthesis: A
Reinforcement Learning Approach [0.0]
We propose a new method for obtaining unboundeds based on Reinforcement Learning (RL)
Our agents learn from scratch in a highly observable partially RL task and outperform existing overall, in instances unseen during training.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-07T20:28:25Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.