IFFair: Influence Function-driven Sample Reweighting for Fair Classification

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.07249v1
• Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2025 07:45:55 GMT
• Title: IFFair: Influence Function-driven Sample Reweighting for Fair Classification
• Authors: Jingran Yang, Min Zhang, Lingfeng Zhang, Zhaohui Wang, Yonggang Zhang,
• Abstract summary: We propose a pre-processing method IFFair based on the influence function.<n>Compared with other fairness optimization approaches, IFFair only uses the influence disparity of training samples on different groups.<n>It achieves better trade-off between multiple utility and fairness metrics compared with previous pre-processing methods.
• Score: 20.099162424205936
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Because machine learning has significantly improved efficiency and convenience in the society, it's increasingly used to assist or replace human decision-making. However, the data-based pattern makes related algorithms learn and even exacerbate potential bias in samples, resulting in discriminatory decisions against certain unprivileged groups, depriving them of the rights to equal treatment, thus damaging the social well-being and hindering the development of related applications. Therefore, we propose a pre-processing method IFFair based on the influence function. Compared with other fairness optimization approaches, IFFair only uses the influence disparity of training samples on different groups as a guidance to dynamically adjust the sample weights during training without modifying the network structure, data features and decision boundaries. To evaluate the validity of IFFair, we conduct experiments on multiple real-world datasets and metrics. The experimental results show that our approach mitigates bias of multiple accepted metrics in the classification setting, including demographic parity, equalized odds, equality of opportunity and error rate parity without conflicts. It also demonstrates that IFFair achieves better trade-off between multiple utility and fairness metrics compared with previous pre-processing methods.

Related papers

• Fairness Is Not Just Ethical: Performance Trade-Off via Data Correlation Tuning to Mitigate Bias in ML Software [11.766190391560684]
  Correlation Tuning (CoT) is a novel pre-processing approach designed to mitigate bias by adjusting data correlations.<n>CoT increases the true positive rate of unprivileged groups by an average of 17.5%.<n>We will publicly release our experimental results and source code to facilitate future research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-19T23:50:27Z)
• Boosting Fair Classifier Generalization through Adaptive Priority Reweighing [59.801444556074394]
  A performance-promising fair algorithm with better generalizability is needed. This paper proposes a novel adaptive reweighing method to eliminate the impact of the distribution shifts between training and test data on model generalizability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-15T13:04:55Z)
• Learning Fair Classifiers via Min-Max F-divergence Regularization [13.81078324883519]
  We introduce a novel min-max F-divergence regularization framework for learning fair classification models. We show that F-divergence measures possess convexity and differentiability properties. We show that the proposed framework achieves state-of-the-art performance with respect to the trade-off between accuracy and fairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-28T20:42:04Z)
• D-BIAS: A Causality-Based Human-in-the-Loop System for Tackling Algorithmic Bias [57.87117733071416]
  We propose D-BIAS, a visual interactive tool that embodies human-in-the-loop AI approach for auditing and mitigating social biases. A user can detect the presence of bias against a group by identifying unfair causal relationships in the causal network. For each interaction, say weakening/deleting a biased causal edge, the system uses a novel method to simulate a new (debiased) dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-10T03:41:48Z)
• Understanding Instance-Level Impact of Fairness Constraints [12.866655972682254]
  We study the influence of training examples when fairness constraints are imposed. We find that training on a subset of weighty data examples leads to lower fairness violations with a trade-off of accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-30T17:31:33Z)
• Normalise for Fairness: A Simple Normalisation Technique for Fairness in Regression Machine Learning Problems [46.93320580613236]
  We present a simple, yet effective method based on normalisation (FaiReg) for regression problems. We compare it with two standard methods for fairness, namely data balancing and adversarial training. The results show the superior performance of diminishing the effects of unfairness better than data balancing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-02T12:26:25Z)
• Achieving Fairness at No Utility Cost via Data Reweighing with Influence [27.31236521189165]
  We propose a data reweighing approach that only adjusts the weight for samples in the training phase. We granularly model the influence of each training sample with regard to fairness-related quantity and predictive utility. Our approach can empirically release the tradeoff and obtain cost-free fairness for equal opportunity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-01T22:12:17Z)
• FairIF: Boosting Fairness in Deep Learning via Influence Functions with Validation Set Sensitive Attributes [51.02407217197623]
  We propose a two-stage training algorithm named FAIRIF. It minimizes the loss over the reweighted data set where the sample weights are computed. We show that FAIRIF yields models with better fairness-utility trade-offs against various types of bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-15T05:14:48Z)
• Can Active Learning Preemptively Mitigate Fairness Issues? [66.84854430781097]
  dataset bias is one of the prevailing causes of unfairness in machine learning. We study whether models trained with uncertainty-based ALs are fairer in their decisions with respect to a protected class. We also explore the interaction of algorithmic fairness methods such as gradient reversal (GRAD) and BALD.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-14T14:20:22Z)
• Towards Model-Agnostic Post-Hoc Adjustment for Balancing Ranking Fairness and Algorithm Utility [54.179859639868646]
  Bipartite ranking aims to learn a scoring function that ranks positive individuals higher than negative ones from labeled data. There have been rising concerns on whether the learned scoring function can cause systematic disparity across different protected groups. We propose a model post-processing framework for balancing them in the bipartite ranking scenario.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-15T10:08:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.