Machine learning to optimize precision in the analysis of randomized trials: A journey in pre-specified, yet data-adaptive learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.13610v1
• Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2025 18:05:45 GMT
• Title: Machine learning to optimize precision in the analysis of randomized trials: A journey in pre-specified, yet data-adaptive learning
• Authors: Laura B. Balzer, Mark J. van der Laan, Maya L. Petersen,
• Abstract summary: We tell our story of developing, evaluating, and implementing a machine learning-based approach for covariate adjustment.<n>We provide the rationale for as well as the practical concerns with such an approach for estimating marginal effects.<n>We present the results from applying our approach in the primary, pre-specified analysis of 8 recently published trials.
• Score: 2.6827221447298406
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Covariate adjustment is an approach to improve the precision of trial analyses by adjusting for baseline variables that are prognostic of the primary endpoint. Motivated by the SEARCH Universal HIV Test-and-Treat Trial (2013-2017), we tell our story of developing, evaluating, and implementing a machine learning-based approach for covariate adjustment. We provide the rationale for as well as the practical concerns with such an approach for estimating marginal effects. Using schematics, we illustrate our procedure: targeted machine learning estimation (TMLE) with Adaptive Pre-specification. Briefly, sample-splitting is used to data-adaptively select the combination of estimators of the outcome regression (i.e., the conditional expectation of the outcome given the trial arm and covariates) and known propensity score (i.e., the conditional probability of being randomized to the intervention given the covariates) that minimizes the cross-validated variance estimate and, thereby, maximizes empirical efficiency. We discuss our approach for evaluating finite sample performance with parametric and plasmode simulations, pre-specifying the Statistical Analysis Plan, and unblinding in real-time on video conference with our colleagues from around the world. We present the results from applying our approach in the primary, pre-specified analysis of 8 recently published trials (2022-2024). We conclude with practical recommendations and an invitation to implement our approach in the primary analysis of your next trial.

Related papers

• Multiply Robust Conformal Risk Control with Coarsened Data [0.0]
  Conformal Prediction (CP) has recently received a tremendous amount of interest.<n>In this paper, we consider the general problem of obtaining distribution-free valid prediction regions for an outcome given coarsened data.<n>Our principled use of semiparametric theory has the key advantage of facilitating flexible machine learning methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-21T12:14:44Z)
• Conformalized Regression for Continuous Bounded Outcomes [0.0]
  Regression problems with bounded continuous outcomes frequently arise in real-world statistical and machine learning applications.<n>Most of the existing statistical and machine learning literature has focused either on point prediction of bounded outcomes or on interval prediction based on approximations.<n>We develop conformal prediction intervals for bounded outcomes based on transformation models and beta regression.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-18T15:51:48Z)
• Prediction-Guided Active Experiments [18.494123886098215]
  We introduce a new framework for active experimentation, the Prediction-Guided Active Experiment (PGAE) PGAE leverages predictions from an existing machine learning model to guide sampling and experimentation. We show that PGAE remains efficient and attains the same semi-parametric bound under certain regularity assumptions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-18T20:16:24Z)
• Federated Causal Inference: Multi-Study ATE Estimation beyond Meta-Analysis [12.896319628045967]
  We study Federated Causal Inference, an approach to estimate treatment effects from decentralized data across centers.<n>We compare three classes of Average Treatment Effect (ATE) estimators derived from the Plug-in G-Formula.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-22T10:19:17Z)
• Flexible Nonparametric Inference for Causal Effects under the Front-Door Model [2.6900047294457683]
  We develop novel one-step and targeted minimum loss-based estimators for both the average treatment effect and the average treatment effect on the treated under front-door assumptions.<n>Our estimators are built on multiple parameterizations of the observed data distribution, including approaches that avoid mediator density entirely.<n>We show how these constraints can be leveraged to improve the efficiency of causal effect estimators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-15T22:04:53Z)
• Selective Nonparametric Regression via Testing [54.20569354303575]
  We develop an abstention procedure via testing the hypothesis on the value of the conditional variance at a given point. Unlike existing methods, the proposed one allows to account not only for the value of the variance itself but also for the uncertainty of the corresponding variance predictor.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-28T13:04:11Z)
• Improving Adaptive Conformal Prediction Using Self-Supervised Learning [72.2614468437919]
  We train an auxiliary model with a self-supervised pretext task on top of an existing predictive model and use the self-supervised error as an additional feature to estimate nonconformity scores. We empirically demonstrate the benefit of the additional information using both synthetic and real data on the efficiency (width), deficit, and excess of conformal prediction intervals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-23T18:57:14Z)
• Semantic Self-adaptation: Enhancing Generalization with a Single Sample [45.111358665370524]
  We propose a self-adaptive approach for semantic segmentation. It fine-tunes the parameters of convolutional layers to the input image using consistency regularization. Our empirical study suggests that self-adaptation may complement the established practice of model regularization at training time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-10T12:29:01Z)
• Predictive machine learning for prescriptive applications: a coupled training-validating approach [77.34726150561087]
  We propose a new method for training predictive machine learning models for prescriptive applications. This approach is based on tweaking the validation step in the standard training-validating-testing scheme. Several experiments with synthetic data demonstrate promising results in reducing the prescription costs in both deterministic and real models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-22T15:03:20Z)
• Bayesian prognostic covariate adjustment [59.75318183140857]
  Historical data about disease outcomes can be integrated into the analysis of clinical trials in many ways. We build on existing literature that uses prognostic scores from a predictive model to increase the efficiency of treatment effect estimates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-24T05:19:03Z)
• Double machine learning for sample selection models [0.12891210250935145]
  This paper considers the evaluation of discretely distributed treatments when outcomes are only observed for a subpopulation due to sample selection or outcome attrition. We make use of (a) Neyman-orthogonal, doubly robust, and efficient score functions, which imply the robustness of treatment effect estimation to moderate regularization biases in the machine learning-based estimation of the outcome, treatment, or sample selection models and (b) sample splitting (or cross-fitting) to prevent overfitting bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-30T19:40:21Z)
• A One-step Approach to Covariate Shift Adaptation [82.01909503235385]
  A default assumption in many machine learning scenarios is that the training and test samples are drawn from the same probability distribution. We propose a novel one-step approach that jointly learns the predictive model and the associated weights in one optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-08T11:35:47Z)
• Machine learning for causal inference: on the use of cross-fit estimators [77.34726150561087]
  Doubly-robust cross-fit estimators have been proposed to yield better statistical properties. We conducted a simulation study to assess the performance of several estimators for the average causal effect (ACE) When used with machine learning, the doubly-robust cross-fit estimators substantially outperformed all of the other estimators in terms of bias, variance, and confidence interval coverage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-21T23:09:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.