Toward Human-Centered AI-Assisted Terminology Work

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.18859v2
• Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2025 18:41:46 GMT
• Title: Toward Human-Centered AI-Assisted Terminology Work
• Abstract summary: This paper argues that a human-centered approach to artificial intelligence has become a necessity for terminology work.<n>The framework is organized around three interrelated dimensions: the augmented terminologist, ethical AI, and human-centered design.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The rapid diffusion of generative artificial intelligence is transforming terminology work. While this technology promises gains in efficiency, its unstructured adoption risks weakening professional autonomy, amplifying bias, and eroding linguistic and conceptual diversity. This paper argues that a human-centered approach to artificial intelligence has become a necessity for terminology work. Building on research in artificial intelligence and translation studies, it proposes a human-centered framework that conceptualizes artificial intelligence as a means of amplifying the terminologist's capabilities, rather than replacing them. The framework is organized around three interrelated dimensions: the augmented terminologist, ethical AI, and human-centered design. Together, these dimensions emphasize the compatibility of high automation with strong human control, the central role of terminologists in bias mitigation, and the importance of designing AI tools and workflows around the needs, values, and well-being of the terminologist. The paper concludes by stressing that current choices in AI adoption will shape not only terminological practice, but also the preservation of accuracy, adequacy, and diversity in terminology and specialized knowledge.

Related papers

• Introducing Human-Centeredness in AI-Assisted Lexicography [0.0]
  This paper proposes a human-centered artificial intelligence (HCAI) framework for AI-assisted lexicography.<n>It argues that AI should augment rather than replace lexicographers, combining automation with meaningful human control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-13T17:00:39Z)
• Large Language Models as a Semantic Interface and Ethical Mediator in Neuro-Digital Ecosystems: Conceptual Foundations and a Regulatory Imperative [83.99688944263843]
  This article introduces and substantiates the concept of Neuro-Linguistic Integration (NLI)<n>It is a novel paradigm for human-technology interaction where Large Language Models act as a key semantic interface between raw neural data and their social application.<n>We argue for the development of a second-order neuroethics,' focused not merely on neural data protection but on the ethics of AI-mediated semantic interpretation itself.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-18T07:34:17Z)
• The Vibe-Automation of Automation: A Proactive Education Framework for Computer Science in the Age of Generative AI [0.7252027234425333]
  generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) represents a qualitative shift in computer science.<n>GenAI operates by navigating contextual, semantic, and coherence rather than optimizing predefined objective metrics.<n>The paper proposes a conceptual framework structured across three analytical levels and three domains of action.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-09T06:02:04Z)
• The Post-Turing Condition: Conceptualising Artificial Subjectivity and Synthetic Sociality [0.23332469289621782]
  In the Post-TurTuring era, artificial intelligence increasingly shapes social coordination and meaning formation.<n>The central challenge is whether processes of interpretation and shared reference are automated in ways that marginalize human participation.<n>This paper proposes Quadrangulation as a design principle for socially embedded AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-19T10:46:52Z)
• The AI Pyramid A Conceptual Framework for Workforce Capability in the Age of AI [2.134211474877041]
  Recent evidence shows that generative AI disproportionately affects highly educated, white collar work.<n>This paper proposes the AI Pyramid, a conceptual framework for organizing human capability in an AI mediated economy.<n>The framework has implications for organizations, education systems, and governments seeking to align learning, measurement, and policy with the evolving demands of AI mediated work.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-10T09:27:56Z)
• Vibe Learning: Education in the age of AI [0.0]
  We argue that the fundamental causes of current AI systems cannot be resolved through existing methods.<n>We propose directions within the constructivist paradigm for transforming education to preserve the long-term advantages of human intelligence over AI tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-03T16:47:05Z)
• Beyond Statistical Learning: Exact Learning Is Essential for General Intelligence [59.07578850674114]
  Sound deductive reasoning is an indisputably desirable aspect of general intelligence.<n>It is well-documented that even the most advanced frontier systems regularly and consistently falter on easily-solvable reasoning tasks.<n>We argue that their unsound behavior is a consequence of the statistical learning approach powering their development.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-30T14:37:50Z)
• Rigor in AI: Doing Rigorous AI Work Requires a Broader, Responsible AI-Informed Conception of Rigor [83.99510317617694]
  We argue that a broader conception of what rigorous AI research and practice should entail is needed.<n>We aim to provide useful language and a framework for much-needed dialogue about the AI community's work.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-17T15:44:41Z)
• Aligning Generalisation Between Humans and Machines [74.120848518198]
  AI technology can support humans in scientific discovery and forming decisions, but may also disrupt democracies and target individuals.<n>The responsible use of AI and its participation in human-AI teams increasingly shows the need for AI alignment.<n>A crucial yet often overlooked aspect of these interactions is the different ways in which humans and machines generalise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-23T18:36:07Z)
• A.I. go by many names: towards a sociotechnical definition of artificial intelligence [0.0]
  Defining artificial intelligence (AI) is a persistent challenge, often muddied by technical ambiguity and varying interpretations. This essay makes a case for a sociotechnical definition of AI, which is essential for researchers who require clarity in their work.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-17T11:25:50Z)
• Converging Paradigms: The Synergy of Symbolic and Connectionist AI in LLM-Empowered Autonomous Agents [55.63497537202751]
  Article explores the convergence of connectionist and symbolic artificial intelligence (AI) Traditionally, connectionist AI focuses on neural networks, while symbolic AI emphasizes symbolic representation and logic. Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) highlight the potential of connectionist architectures in handling human language as a form of symbols.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-11T14:00:53Z)
• Position: Towards Bidirectional Human-AI Alignment [109.57781720848669]
  We argue that the research community should explicitly define and critically reflect on "alignment" to account for the bidirectional and dynamic relationship between humans and AI.<n>We introduce the Bidirectional Human-AI Alignment framework, which not only incorporates traditional efforts to align AI with human values but also introduces the critical, underexplored dimension of aligning humans with AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T16:03:25Z)
• What Generative Artificial Intelligence Means for Terminological Definitions [0.0]
  This paper examines the impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) tools on the creation and consumption of terminological definitions. GenAI tools enable AI-assisted terminography, notably post-editing terminography. The potential of GenAI tools to fulfill all the terminological needs of a user, including term definitions, challenges the very existence of terminological definitions and resources as we know them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-25T16:36:51Z)
• Ontology in Hybrid Intelligence: a concise literature review [3.9160947065896803]
  Hybrid Intelligence is gaining popularity to refer to a balanced coexistence between human and artificial intelligence. Ontology improves quality and accuracy, as well as a specific role to enable extended interoperability. An application-oriented analysis has shown a significant role in present systems (70+% the cases) and, potentially, in future systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-30T09:55:29Z)
• An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
  This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence. The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.