Large Language Models as a Semantic Interface and Ethical Mediator in Neuro-Digital Ecosystems: Conceptual Foundations and a Regulatory Imperative

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.17444v1
• Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2026 07:34:17 GMT
• Title: Large Language Models as a Semantic Interface and Ethical Mediator in Neuro-Digital Ecosystems: Conceptual Foundations and a Regulatory Imperative
• Abstract summary: This article introduces and substantiates the concept of Neuro-Linguistic Integration (NLI)<n>It is a novel paradigm for human-technology interaction where Large Language Models act as a key semantic interface between raw neural data and their social application.<n>We argue for the development of a second-order neuroethics,' focused not merely on neural data protection but on the ethics of AI-mediated semantic interpretation itself.
• Score: 83.99688944263843
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This article introduces and substantiates the concept of Neuro-Linguistic Integration (NLI), a novel paradigm for human-technology interaction where Large Language Models (LLMs) act as a key semantic interface between raw neural data and their social application. We analyse the dual nature of LLMs in this role: as tools that augment human capabilities in communication, medicine, and education, and as sources of unprecedented ethical risks to mental autonomy and neurorights. By synthesizing insights from AI ethics, neuroethics, and the philosophy of technology, the article critiques the inherent limitations of LLMs as semantic mediators, highlighting core challenges such as the erosion of agency in translation, threats to mental integrity through precision semantic suggestion, and the emergence of a new `neuro-linguistic divide' as a form of biosemantic inequality. Moving beyond a critique of existing regulatory models (e.g., GDPR, EU AI Act), which fail to address the dynamic, meaning-making processes of NLI, we propose a foundational framework for proactive governance. This framework is built on the principles of Semantic Transparency, Mental Informed Consent, and Agency Preservation, supported by practical tools such as NLI-specific ethics sandboxes, bias-aware certification of LLMs, and legal recognition of the neuro-linguistic inference. The article argues for the development of a `second-order neuroethics,' focused not merely on neural data protection but on the ethics of AI-mediated semantic interpretation itself, thereby providing a crucial conceptual basis for steering the responsible development of neuro-digital ecosystems.

Related papers

• An Onto-Relational-Sophic Framework for Governing Synthetic Minds [8.863423225865187]
  We introduce the Onto-Relational-Sophic (ORS) framework, grounded in Cyberism philosophy.<n>ORS offers integrated answers to challenges through three pillars.<n>We apply the framework to emergent scenarios including autonomous research agents, AI-mediated healthcare, and agentic AI ecosystems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-19T08:58:10Z)
• A Survey of Reasoning in Autonomous Driving Systems: Open Challenges and Emerging Paradigms [49.66022971508878]
  We argue that reasoning should be elevated from a modular component to the system's cognitive core.<n>We derive and systematize seven core reasoning challenges, such as the responsiveness-reasoning trade-off and social-game reasoning.<n>We identify a fundamental and unresolved tension between the high-latency, deliberative nature of LLM-based reasoning and the millisecond-scale, safety-critical demands of vehicle control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-11T07:40:53Z)
• A Survey of Vibe Coding with Large Language Models [93.88284590533242]
  "Vibe Coding" is a development methodology where developers validate AI-generated implementations through outcome observation.<n>Despite its transformative potential, the effectiveness of this emergent paradigm remains under-explored.<n>This survey provides the first comprehensive and systematic review of Vibe Coding with large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-14T11:26:56Z)
• Noosemia: toward a Cognitive and Phenomenological Account of Intentionality Attribution in Human-Generative AI Interaction [4.022364531869169]
  This paper introduces and formalizes Noosemia, a novel cognitive-phenomenological pattern emerging from human interaction with generative AI systems.<n>We propose a multidisciplinary framework to explain how, under certain conditions, users attribute intentionality, agency, and even interiority to these systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-04T17:10:08Z)
• AI Mother Tongue: Self-Emergent Communication in MARL via Endogenous Symbol Systems [0.0]
  We show that when agents possess an endogenous symbol system, their neural representations naturally exhibit spontaneous semantic compression and Nash equilibrium-driven semantic convergence.<n>This discovery offers new avenues for bridging symbolism and connectionism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-07T09:52:49Z)
• Neural Brain: A Neuroscience-inspired Framework for Embodied Agents [78.61382193420914]
  Current AI systems, such as large language models, remain disembodied, unable to physically engage with the world.<n>At the core of this challenge lies the concept of Neural Brain, a central intelligence system designed to drive embodied agents with human-like adaptability.<n>This paper introduces a unified framework for the Neural Brain of embodied agents, addressing two fundamental challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-12T15:05:34Z)
• Nature's Insight: A Novel Framework and Comprehensive Analysis of Agentic Reasoning Through the Lens of Neuroscience [11.174550573411008]
  We propose a novel neuroscience-inspired framework for agentic reasoning.<n>We apply this framework to systematically classify and analyze existing AI reasoning methods.<n>We propose new neural-inspired reasoning methods, analogous to chain-of-thought prompting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-07T14:25:46Z)
• A Survey on Post-training of Large Language Models [185.51013463503946]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have fundamentally transformed natural language processing, making them indispensable across domains ranging from conversational systems to scientific exploration.<n>These challenges necessitate advanced post-training language models (PoLMs) to address shortcomings, such as restricted reasoning capacities, ethical uncertainties, and suboptimal domain-specific performance.<n>This paper presents the first comprehensive survey of PoLMs, systematically tracing their evolution across five core paradigms: Fine-tuning, which enhances task-specific accuracy; Alignment, which ensures ethical coherence and alignment with human preferences; Reasoning, which advances multi-step inference despite challenges in reward design; Integration and Adaptation, which
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-08T05:41:42Z)
• Converging Paradigms: The Synergy of Symbolic and Connectionist AI in LLM-Empowered Autonomous Agents [55.63497537202751]
  Article explores the convergence of connectionist and symbolic artificial intelligence (AI) Traditionally, connectionist AI focuses on neural networks, while symbolic AI emphasizes symbolic representation and logic. Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) highlight the potential of connectionist architectures in handling human language as a form of symbols.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-11T14:00:53Z)
• Hybrid Approaches for Moral Value Alignment in AI Agents: a Manifesto [3.7414804164475983]
  Increasing interest in ensuring the safety of next-generation Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems calls for novel approaches to embedding morality into autonomous agents.<n>We provide a systematization of existing approaches to the problem of introducing morality in machines - modelled as a continuum.<n>We argue that more hybrid solutions are needed to create adaptable and robust, yet controllable and interpretable agentic systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-04T11:46:34Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.