Statistical vs. Deep Learning Models for Estimating Substance Overdose Excess Mortality in the US

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.21456v1
• Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2025 00:49:59 GMT
• Title: Statistical vs. Deep Learning Models for Estimating Substance Overdose Excess Mortality in the US
• Authors: Sukanya Krishna, Marie-Laure Charpignon, Maimuna Majumder,
• Abstract summary: Estimating excess mortality, defined as deaths beyond expected levels based on pre-pandemic patterns, is essential for understanding pandemic impacts and informing intervention strategies.<n>We present a systematic comparison of SARIMA against three deep learning (DL) architectures (LSTM, Seq2Seq, and Transformer) for counterfactual mortality estimation.<n>Our findings establish that carefully validated DL models can provide more reliable counterfactual estimates than traditional methods for public health planning.
• Score: 0.951591069547877
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Substance overdose mortality in the United States claimed over 80,000 lives in 2023, with the COVID-19 pandemic exacerbating existing trends through healthcare disruptions and behavioral changes. Estimating excess mortality, defined as deaths beyond expected levels based on pre-pandemic patterns, is essential for understanding pandemic impacts and informing intervention strategies. However, traditional statistical methods like SARIMA assume linearity, stationarity, and fixed seasonality, which may not hold under structural disruptions. We present a systematic comparison of SARIMA against three deep learning (DL) architectures (LSTM, Seq2Seq, and Transformer) for counterfactual mortality estimation using national CDC data (2015-2019 for training/validation, 2020-2023 for projection). We contribute empirical evidence that LSTM achieves superior point estimation (17.08% MAPE vs. 23.88% for SARIMA) and better-calibrated uncertainty (68.8% vs. 47.9% prediction interval coverage) when projecting under regime change. We also demonstrate that attention-based models (Seq2Seq, Transformer) underperform due to overfitting to historical means rather than capturing emergent trends. Ourreproducible pipeline incorporates conformal prediction intervals and convergence analysis across 60+ trials per configuration, and we provide an open-source framework deployable with 15 state health departments. Our findings establish that carefully validated DL models can provide more reliable counterfactual estimates than traditional methods for public health planning, while highlighting the need for calibration techniques when deploying neural forecasting in high-stakes domains.

Related papers

• A Comparative Analysis of Traditional and Deep Learning Time Series Architectures for Influenza A Infectious Disease Forecasting [0.0]
  Influenza A is responsible for 290,000 to 650,000 respiratory deaths a year.<n>In this study, we perform a comparative analysis of traditional and deep learning models to predict Influenza A outbreaks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-18T03:20:29Z)
• Deep State-Space Generative Model For Correlated Time-to-Event Predictions [54.3637600983898]
  We propose a deep latent state-space generative model to capture the interactions among different types of correlated clinical events. Our method also uncovers meaningful insights about the latent correlations among mortality and different types of organ failures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-28T02:42:36Z)
• SepsisLab: Early Sepsis Prediction with Uncertainty Quantification and Active Sensing [67.8991481023825]
  Sepsis is the leading cause of in-hospital mortality in the USA. Existing predictive models are usually trained on high-quality data with few missing information. For the potential high-risk patients with low confidence due to limited observations, we propose a robust active sensing algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-24T04:47:36Z)
• Interpreting Forecasted Vital Signs Using N-BEATS in Sepsis Patients [0.5541644538483947]
  Our research examines N-BEATS, an interpretable deep-learning forecasting model that can forecast 3 hours of vital signs for sepsis patients in intensive care units (ICUs) We use the N-BEATS interpretable configuration to forecast the vital sign trends and compare them with the actual trend to understand better the patient's changing condition and the effects of infused drugs on their vital signs. We observed that the mortality rate was higher (92%) when the actual and forecasted trends closely matched, compared to when they were not similar.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-24T16:23:54Z)
• When in Doubt: Neural Non-Parametric Uncertainty Quantification for Epidemic Forecasting [70.54920804222031]
  Most existing forecasting models disregard uncertainty quantification, resulting in mis-calibrated predictions. Recent works in deep neural models for uncertainty-aware time-series forecasting also have several limitations. We model the forecasting task as a probabilistic generative process and propose a functional neural process model called EPIFNP.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T18:31:47Z)
• Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Approaches to Analyze and Predict the Covid-19 Outbreak [10.307715136465056]
  We present a comparative analysis of various machine learning (ML) approaches in predicting the COVID-19 outbreak in the epidemiological domain. The results reveal the advantages of ML algorithms for supporting decision making of evolving short term policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-11T11:57:33Z)
• STELAR: Spatio-temporal Tensor Factorization with Latent Epidemiological Regularization [76.57716281104938]
  We develop a tensor method to predict the evolution of epidemic trends for many regions simultaneously. STELAR enables long-term prediction by incorporating latent temporal regularization through a system of discrete-time difference equations. We conduct experiments using both county- and state-level COVID-19 data and show that our model can identify interesting latent patterns of the epidemic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-08T21:21:47Z)
• UNITE: Uncertainty-based Health Risk Prediction Leveraging Multi-sourced Data [81.00385374948125]
  We present UNcertaInTy-based hEalth risk prediction (UNITE) model. UNITE provides accurate disease risk prediction and uncertainty estimation leveraging multi-sourced health data. We evaluate UNITE on real-world disease risk prediction tasks: nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NASH) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) UNITE achieves up to 0.841 in F1 score for AD detection, up to 0.609 in PR-AUC for NASH detection, and outperforms various state-of-the-art baselines by up to $19%$ over the best baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-22T02:28:11Z)
• Backtesting the predictability of COVID-19 [0.0]
  We use historical data of COVID-19 infections from 253 regions from the period of 22nd January 2020 until 22nd June 2020. Prediction errors are substantially higher in early stages of the pandemic, resulting from limited data. The more confirmed cases a country exhibits at any point in time, the lower the error in forecasting future confirmed cases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-22T13:18:00Z)
• Enabling Counterfactual Survival Analysis with Balanced Representations [64.17342727357618]
  Survival data are frequently encountered across diverse medical applications, i.e., drug development, risk profiling, and clinical trials. We propose a theoretically grounded unified framework for counterfactual inference applicable to survival outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-14T01:15:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.