Enhancing LLM Planning Capabilities through Intrinsic Self-Critique

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.24103v1
• Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2025 09:23:25 GMT
• Title: Enhancing LLM Planning Capabilities through Intrinsic Self-Critique
• Authors: Bernd Bohnet, Pierre-Alexandre Kamienny, Hanie Sedghi, Dilan Gorur, Pranjal Awasthi, Aaron Parisi, Kevin Swersky, Rosanne Liu, Azade Nova, Noah Fiedel,
• Abstract summary: We show significant performance gains on planning datasets through intrinsic self-critique, without external source such as a verifier.<n>We illustrate how self-critique can significantly boost planning performance.
• Score: 34.77684636726252
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: We demonstrate an approach for LLMs to critique their \emph{own} answers with the goal of enhancing their performance that leads to significant improvements over established planning benchmarks. Despite the findings of earlier research that has cast doubt on the effectiveness of LLMs leveraging self critique methods, we show significant performance gains on planning datasets in the Blocksworld domain through intrinsic self-critique, without external source such as a verifier. We also demonstrate similar improvements on Logistics and Mini-grid datasets, exceeding strong baseline accuracies. We employ a few-shot learning technique and progressively extend it to a many-shot approach as our base method and demonstrate that it is possible to gain substantial improvement on top of this already competitive approach by employing an iterative process for correction and refinement. We illustrate how self-critique can significantly boost planning performance. Our empirical results present new state-of-the-art on the class of models considered, namely LLM model checkpoints from October 2024. Our primary focus lies on the method itself, demonstrating intrinsic self-improvement capabilities that are applicable regardless of the specific model version, and we believe that applying our method to more complex search techniques and more capable models will lead to even better performance.

Related papers

• Learning from Self Critique and Refinement for Faithful LLM Summarization [26.593763749112792]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) often suffer from hallucinations when performing long-form text generation tasks such as summarization.<n>We propose Self Critique and Refinement-based Preference Optimization (SCRPO)<n>SCRPO is a self-supervised training framework that first constructs a preference dataset by leveraging the LLM's own critique and refinement capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-05T02:59:43Z)
• Demystifying Reinforcement Learning in Agentic Reasoning [90.3737088727791]
  We conduct a comprehensive and systematic investigation to demystify reinforcement learning in agentic reasoning.<n>We highlight our key insights: (i) replacing stitched synthetic trajectories with real end-to-end tool-use trajectories yields a far stronger SFT.<n> Exploration-friendly techniques are crucial for agentic RL, such as clip higher, overlong reward shaping, and maintaining adequate policy entropy could improve the training efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-13T17:57:15Z)
• Theoretical Modeling of LLM Self-Improvement Training Dynamics Through Solver-Verifier Gap [11.709132975874638]
  We theoretically model the training dynamics of self-improvement via the concept of solver-verifier gap.<n>We extend our analysis to investigate how external data influences these dynamics within the framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-29T06:48:47Z)
• RealCritic: Towards Effectiveness-Driven Evaluation of Language Model Critiques [59.861013614500024]
  We introduce a new benchmark designed to assess the critique capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>Unlike existing benchmarks, which typically function in an open-loop fashion, our approach employs a closed-loop methodology that evaluates the quality of corrections generated from critiques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-24T13:48:10Z)
• Self-Evolving Critique Abilities in Large Language Models [59.861013614500024]
  This paper explores enhancing critique abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We introduce SCRIT, a framework that trains LLMs with self-generated data to evolve their critique abilities.<n>Our analysis reveals that SCRIT's performance scales positively with data and model size.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-10T05:51:52Z)
• RaCT: Ranking-aware Chain-of-Thought Optimization for LLMs [30.216174551427443]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable potential in text reranking tasks.<n> conventional supervised fine-tuning approaches for specializing LLMs in ranking tasks often lead to significant degradation of the models' general-purpose abilities.<n>This paper presents a novel methodology that strategically combines Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting techniques with an innovative two-stage training pipeline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-18T23:24:15Z)
• Mind the Gap: Examining the Self-Improvement Capabilities of Large Language Models [10.449015816015566]
  Self-improvement is a mechanism in Large Language Model (LLM) pre-training, post-training and test-time inference.<n>We provide a mathematical formulation for self-improvement, which is largely governed by a quantity which we formalize as the generation-verification gap.<n>We also examine when self-improvement is possible, an iterative self-improvement procedure, and ways to improve its performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-03T18:47:26Z)
• Self-Improvement in Language Models: The Sharpening Mechanism [70.9248553790022]
  We offer a new perspective on the capabilities of self-improvement through a lens we refer to as sharpening.<n>Motivated by the observation that language models are often better at verifying response quality than they are at generating correct responses, we formalize self-improvement as using the model itself as a verifier during post-training.<n>We analyze two natural families of self-improvement algorithms based on SFT and RLHF.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-02T20:24:17Z)
• Exploring and Benchmarking the Planning Capabilities of Large Language Models [57.23454975238014]
  This work lays the foundations for improving planning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) We construct a comprehensive benchmark suite encompassing both classical planning benchmarks and natural language scenarios. We investigate the use of many-shot in-context learning to enhance LLM planning, exploring the relationship between increased context length and improved planning performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-18T22:57:06Z)
• Monte Carlo Tree Search Boosts Reasoning via Iterative Preference Learning [55.96599486604344]
  We introduce an approach aimed at enhancing the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) through an iterative preference learning process. We use Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) to iteratively collect preference data, utilizing its look-ahead ability to break down instance-level rewards into more granular step-level signals. The proposed algorithm employs Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) to update the LLM policy using this newly generated step-level preference data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-01T11:10:24Z)
• Step-On-Feet Tuning: Scaling Self-Alignment of LLMs via Bootstrapping [53.454408491386886]
  bootstrapping self-alignment markedly surpasses the single-round approach. We propose Step-On-Feet Tuning (SOFT) which leverages model's continuously enhanced few-shot ability to boost zero or one-shot performance. Based on easy-to-hard training recipe, we propose SOFT+ which further boost self-alignment's performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-12T12:30:42Z)
• From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuning [52.257422715393574]
  We introduce a self-guided methodology for Large Language Models (LLMs) to autonomously discern and select cherry samples from open-source datasets. Our key innovation, the Instruction-Following Difficulty (IFD) metric, emerges as a pivotal metric to identify discrepancies between a model's expected responses and its intrinsic generation capability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-23T09:45:29Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.