The Optimal Sample Complexity of Linear Contracts
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.01496v1
- Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2026 11:45:17 GMT
- Title: The Optimal Sample Complexity of Linear Contracts
- Authors: Mikael Møller Høgsgaard,
- Abstract summary: Empirical Utility Maximization (EUM) algorithm yields an $varepsilon$-approximation of the optimal linear contract with probability at least $1-$.<n>Our proof establishes the stronger guarantee of uniform convergence.
- Score: 6.768558752130311
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: In this paper, we settle the problem of learning optimal linear contracts from data in the offline setting, where agent types are drawn from an unknown distribution and the principal's goal is to design a contract that maximizes her expected utility. Specifically, our analysis shows that the simple Empirical Utility Maximization (EUM) algorithm yields an $\varepsilon$-approximation of the optimal linear contract with probability at least $1-δ$, using just $O(\ln(1/δ) / \varepsilon^2)$ samples. This result improves upon previously known bounds and matches a lower bound from Duetting et al. [2025] up to constant factors, thereby proving its optimality. Our analysis uses a chaining argument, where the key insight is to leverage a simple structural property of linear contracts: their expected reward is non-decreasing. This property, which holds even though the utility function itself is non-monotone and discontinuous, enables the construction of fine-grained nets required for the chaining argument, which in turn yields the optimal sample complexity. Furthermore, our proof establishes the stronger guarantee of uniform convergence: the empirical utility of every linear contract is a $\varepsilon$-approximation of its true expectation with probability at least $1-δ$, using the same optimal $O(\ln(1/δ) / \varepsilon^2)$ sample complexity.
Related papers
- Optimal Unconstrained Self-Distillation in Ridge Regression: Strict Improvements, Precise Asymptotics, and One-Shot Tuning [61.07540493350384]
Self-distillation (SD) is the process of retraining a student on a mixture of ground-truth and the teacher's own predictions.<n>We show that for any prediction risk, the optimally mixed student improves upon the ridge teacher for every regularization level.<n>We propose a consistent one-shot tuning method to estimate $star$ without grid search, sample splitting, or refitting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-19T17:21:15Z) - Simple Convergence Proof of Adam From a Sign-like Descent Perspective [58.89890024903816]
We show that Adam achieves the optimal rate of $cal O(frac1Ts14)$ rather than the previous $cal O(fracln TTs14)$.<n>Our theoretical analysis provides new insights into the role of momentum as a key factor ensuring convergence.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-08T13:19:26Z) - Sign Operator for Coping with Heavy-Tailed Noise in Non-Convex Optimization: High Probability Bounds Under $(L_0, L_1)$-Smoothness [74.18546828528298]
We show that SignSGD with Majority Voting can robustly work on the whole range of complexity with $kappakappakappakappa-1right, kappakappakappa-1right, kappakappakappa-1right, kappakappakappa-1right, kappakappakappa-1right, kappakappakappa-1right, kappakappakappa-1right, kappa
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-11T19:54:11Z) - Towards a Sharp Analysis of Offline Policy Learning for $f$-Divergence-Regularized Contextual Bandits [49.96531901205305]
We analyze $f$-divergence-regularized offline policy learning.<n>For reverse Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence, we give the first $tildeO(epsilon-1)$ sample complexity under single-policy concentrability.<n>We extend our analysis to dueling bandits, and we believe these results take a significant step toward a comprehensive understanding of $f$-divergence-regularized policy learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-09T22:14:45Z) - Complexity Analysis of Normalizing Constant Estimation: from Jarzynski Equality to Annealed Importance Sampling and beyond [40.79840141270367]
Given an unnormalized probability density $piproptomathrme-V$, estimating its normalizing constant $Z=int_mathbbRdmathrme-V(x)mathrmdx$ or free energy $F=-log Z$ is a crucial problem in Bayesian statistics, statistical mechanics, and machine learning.<n>We propose a new algorithm based on reverse diffusion samplers, establish a framework for analyzing its complexity, and empirically demonstrate its efficiency in tackling multimodality.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-07T00:05:28Z) - Convergence Rate Analysis of LION [54.28350823319057]
LION converges iterations of $cal(sqrtdK-)$ measured by gradient Karush-Kuhn-T (sqrtdK-)$.
We show that LION can achieve lower loss and higher performance compared to standard SGD.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-12T11:30:53Z) - Private Stochastic Convex Optimization with Heavy Tails: Near-Optimality from Simple Reductions [19.008521454738425]
We study the problem of differentially private convex optimization (DP-SCO) with heavy-tailed gradients, where we assume a $ktextth$-moment bound on the Lipschitz constants of sample functions rather than a uniform bound.
We propose a new reduction-based approach that enables us to obtain the first optimal rates (up to logarithmic factors) in the heavy-tailed setting, achieving error $Gcdot frac 1 sqrt n + G_k cdot (fracsqrt dnepsilon)1
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-04T21:26:29Z) - Achieving the Asymptotically Optimal Sample Complexity of Offline Reinforcement Learning: A DRO-Based Approach [36.88301225561535]
offline reinforcement learning aims to learn from pre-collected datasets without active exploration.
Existing approaches adopt a pessimistic stance towards uncertainty by penalizing rewards of under-explored state-action pairs to estimate value functions conservatively.
We show that the distributionally robust optimization (DRO) based approach can also address these challenges and is asymptotically minimax optimal
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-22T17:50:18Z) - Near-Optimal Non-Convex Stochastic Optimization under Generalized
Smoothness [21.865728815935665]
Two recent works established the $O(epsilon-3)$ sample complexity to obtain an $O(epsilon)$-stationary point.
However, both require a large batch size on the order of $mathrmploy(epsilon-1)$, which is not only computationally burdensome but also unsuitable for streaming applications.
In this work, we solve the prior two problems simultaneously by revisiting a simple variant of the STORM algorithm.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-13T00:22:28Z) - Thinking Outside the Ball: Optimal Learning with Gradient Descent for
Generalized Linear Stochastic Convex Optimization [37.177329562964765]
We consider linear prediction with a convex Lipschitz loss, or more generally, convex optimization problems of generalized linear form.
We show that in this setting, early iteration stopped Gradient Descent (GD), without any explicit regularization or projection, ensures excess error at most $epsilon$.
But instead of uniform convergence in a norm ball, which we show can guarantee suboptimal learning using $Theta (1/epsilon4)$ samples, we rely on uniform convergence in a distribution-dependent ball.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-27T09:41:43Z) - A Law of Robustness beyond Isoperimetry [84.33752026418045]
We prove a Lipschitzness lower bound $Omega(sqrtn/p)$ of robustness of interpolating neural network parameters on arbitrary distributions.
We then show the potential benefit of overparametrization for smooth data when $n=mathrmpoly(d)$.
We disprove the potential existence of an $O(1)$-Lipschitz robust interpolating function when $n=exp(omega(d))$.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-23T16:10:23Z) - Convergence Rates of Stochastic Gradient Descent under Infinite Noise
Variance [14.06947898164194]
Heavy tails emerge in gradient descent (SGD) in various scenarios.
We provide convergence guarantees for SGD under a state-dependent and heavy-tailed noise with a potentially infinite variance.
Our results indicate that even under heavy-tailed noise with infinite variance, SGD can converge to the global optimum.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-20T13:45:11Z) - Optimal Robust Linear Regression in Nearly Linear Time [97.11565882347772]
We study the problem of high-dimensional robust linear regression where a learner is given access to $n$ samples from the generative model $Y = langle X,w* rangle + epsilon$
We propose estimators for this problem under two settings: (i) $X$ is L4-L2 hypercontractive, $mathbbE [XXtop]$ has bounded condition number and $epsilon$ has bounded variance and (ii) $X$ is sub-Gaussian with identity second moment and $epsilon$ is
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-16T06:44:44Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.