Can AI Chatbots Provide Coaching in Engineering? Beyond Information Processing Toward Mastery

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.03693v1
• Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2026 08:28:47 GMT
• Title: Can AI Chatbots Provide Coaching in Engineering? Beyond Information Processing Toward Mastery
• Authors: Junaid Qadir, Muhammad Adil Attique, Saleha Shoaib, Syed Ibrahim Ghaznavi,
• Abstract summary: Engineering education faces a double disruption: traditional apprenticeship models that cultivated judgment and tacit skill are eroding, just as generative AI emerges as an informal coaching partner.<n>This convergence rekindles long-standing questions in the philosophy of AI and cognition about the limits of computation, the nature of embodied rationality, and the distinction between information processing and wisdom.<n>We synthesize critical perspectives from decades of scholarship on expertise, tacit knowledge, and human-machine interaction, situating them within the context of contemporary AI-driven education.<n>We propose a multiplex coaching framework that integrates human wisdom within expert-in-the-loop models, preserving the depth
• Score: 1.4837859618020621
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Engineering education faces a double disruption: traditional apprenticeship models that cultivated judgment and tacit skill are eroding, just as generative AI emerges as an informal coaching partner. This convergence rekindles long-standing questions in the philosophy of AI and cognition about the limits of computation, the nature of embodied rationality, and the distinction between information processing and wisdom. Building on this rich intellectual tradition, this paper examines whether AI chatbots can provide coaching that fosters mastery rather than merely delivering information. We synthesize critical perspectives from decades of scholarship on expertise, tacit knowledge, and human-machine interaction, situating them within the context of contemporary AI-driven education. Empirically, we report findings from a mixed-methods study (N = 75 students, N = 7 faculty) exploring the use of a coaching chatbot in engineering education. Results reveal a consistent boundary: participants accept AI for technical problem solving (convergent tasks; M = 3.84 on a 1-5 Likert scale) but remain skeptical of its capacity for moral, emotional, and contextual judgment (divergent tasks). Faculty express stronger concerns over risk (M = 4.71 vs. M = 4.14, p = 0.003), and privacy emerges as a key requirement, with 64-71 percent of participants demanding strict confidentiality. Our findings suggest that while generative AI can democratize access to cognitive and procedural support, it cannot replicate the embodied, value-laden dimensions of human mentorship. We propose a multiplex coaching framework that integrates human wisdom within expert-in-the-loop models, preserving the depth of apprenticeship while leveraging AI scalability to enrich the next generation of engineering education.

Related papers

• The Psychology of Learning from Machines: Anthropomorphic AI and the Paradox of Automation in Education [1.8217623940980625]
  This work synthesizes four research traditions to establish a comprehensive framework for understanding how learners psychologically relate to anthropomorphic AI tutors.<n>We identify three persistent challenges intensified by Generative AI's conversational fluency.<n>We ground this theoretical synthesis through comparative analysis of over 104,984 YouTube comments across AI-generated philosophical debates and human-created engineering tutorials.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-07T08:28:33Z)
• Imagining and building wise machines: The centrality of AI metacognition [78.76893632793497]
  We examine what is known about human wisdom and sketch a vision of its AI counterpart.<n>We argue that AI systems particularly struggle with metacognition.<n>We discuss how wise AI might be benchmarked, trained, and implemented.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T18:10:10Z)
• Visions of a Discipline: Analyzing Introductory AI Courses on YouTube [11.209406323898019]
  We analyze the 20 most watched introductory AI courses on YouTube. Introductory AI courses do not meaningfully engage with ethical or societal challenges of AI. We recommend that introductory AI courses should highlight ethical challenges of AI to present a more balanced perspective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-31T01:48:42Z)
• Untangling Critical Interaction with AI in Students Written Assessment [2.8078480738404]
  Key challenge exists in ensuring that humans are equipped with the required critical thinking and AI literacy skills. This paper provides a first step toward conceptualizing the notion of critical learner interaction with AI. Using both theoretical models and empirical data, our preliminary findings suggest a general lack of Deep interaction with AI during the writing process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-10T12:12:50Z)
• A Review on Objective-Driven Artificial Intelligence [0.0]
  Humans have an innate ability to understand context, nuances, and subtle cues in communication. Humans possess a vast repository of common-sense knowledge that helps us make logical inferences and predictions about the world. Machines lack this innate understanding and often struggle with making sense of situations that humans find trivial.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-20T02:07:42Z)
• Seamful XAI: Operationalizing Seamful Design in Explainable AI [59.89011292395202]
  Mistakes in AI systems are inevitable, arising from both technical limitations and sociotechnical gaps. We propose that seamful design can foster AI explainability by revealing sociotechnical and infrastructural mismatches. We explore this process with 43 AI practitioners and real end-users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-12T21:54:05Z)
• Cybertrust: From Explainable to Actionable and Interpretable AI (AI2) [58.981120701284816]
  Actionable and Interpretable AI (AI2) will incorporate explicit quantifications and visualizations of user confidence in AI recommendations. It will allow examining and testing of AI system predictions to establish a basis for trust in the systems' decision making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-26T18:53:09Z)
• Trustworthy AI: A Computational Perspective [54.80482955088197]
  We focus on six of the most crucial dimensions in achieving trustworthy AI: (i) Safety & Robustness, (ii) Non-discrimination & Fairness, (iii) Explainability, (iv) Privacy, (v) Accountability & Auditability, and (vi) Environmental Well-Being. For each dimension, we review the recent related technologies according to a taxonomy and summarize their applications in real-world systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-12T14:21:46Z)
• The MineRL BASALT Competition on Learning from Human Feedback [58.17897225617566]
  The MineRL BASALT competition aims to spur forward research on this important class of techniques. We design a suite of four tasks in Minecraft for which we expect it will be hard to write down hardcoded reward functions. We provide a dataset of human demonstrations on each of the four tasks, as well as an imitation learning baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-05T12:18:17Z)
• Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
  In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society. A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests. This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z)
• Dynamic Cognition Applied to Value Learning in Artificial Intelligence [0.0]
  Several researchers in the area are trying to develop a robust, beneficial, and safe concept of artificial intelligence. It is of utmost importance that artificial intelligent agents have their values aligned with human values. A possible approach to this problem would be to use theoretical models such as SED.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-12T03:58:52Z)
• Human Evaluation of Interpretability: The Case of AI-Generated Music Knowledge [19.508678969335882]
  We focus on evaluating AI-discovered knowledge/rules in the arts and humanities. We present an experimental procedure to collect and assess human-generated verbal interpretations of AI-generated music theory/rules rendered as sophisticated symbolic/numeric objects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-15T06:03:34Z)
• Explainable Active Learning (XAL): An Empirical Study of How Local Explanations Impact Annotator Experience [76.9910678786031]
  We propose a novel paradigm of explainable active learning (XAL), by introducing techniques from the recently surging field of explainable AI (XAI) into an Active Learning setting. Our study shows benefits of AI explanation as interfaces for machine teaching--supporting trust calibration and enabling rich forms of teaching feedback, and potential drawbacks--anchoring effect with the model judgment and cognitive workload.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-24T22:52:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.