RedBench: A Universal Dataset for Comprehensive Red Teaming of Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.03699v1
• Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2026 08:34:17 GMT
• Title: RedBench: A Universal Dataset for Comprehensive Red Teaming of Large Language Models
• Authors: Quy-Anh Dang, Chris Ngo, Truong-Son Hy,
• Abstract summary: We introduce RedBench, a universal dataset aggregating 37 benchmark datasets from leading conferences and repositories.<n>RedBench employs a standardized taxonomy with 22 risk categories and 19 domains, enabling consistent and comprehensive evaluations of vulnerabilities.<n>Our contributions facilitate robust comparisons, foster future research, and promote the development of secure and reliable large language models.
• Score: 7.670564416668674
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: As large language models (LLMs) become integral to safety-critical applications, ensuring their robustness against adversarial prompts is paramount. However, existing red teaming datasets suffer from inconsistent risk categorizations, limited domain coverage, and outdated evaluations, hindering systematic vulnerability assessments. To address these challenges, we introduce RedBench, a universal dataset aggregating 37 benchmark datasets from leading conferences and repositories, comprising 29,362 samples across attack and refusal prompts. RedBench employs a standardized taxonomy with 22 risk categories and 19 domains, enabling consistent and comprehensive evaluations of LLM vulnerabilities. We provide a detailed analysis of existing datasets, establish baselines for modern LLMs, and open-source the dataset and evaluation code. Our contributions facilitate robust comparisons, foster future research, and promote the development of secure and reliable LLMs for real-world deployment. Code: https://github.com/knoveleng/redeval

Related papers

• SoK: Taxonomy and Evaluation of Prompt Security in Large Language Models [17.94525181892254]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have rapidly become integral to real-world applications, powering services across diverse sectors.<n>Their widespread deployment has exposed critical security risks, particularly through jailbreak prompts that can bypass model alignment and induce harmful outputs.<n>Despite intense research into both attack and defense techniques, the field remains fragmented: definitions, threat models, and evaluation criteria vary widely, impeding systematic progress and fair comparison.<n>Our work unifies fragmented research, provides rigorous foundations for future studies, and supports the development of robust, trustworthy LLMs suitable for high-stakes deployment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-17T09:38:54Z)
• LLMs in Software Security: A Survey of Vulnerability Detection Techniques and Insights [12.424610893030353]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are emerging as transformative tools for software vulnerability detection.<n>This paper provides a detailed survey of LLMs in vulnerability detection.<n>We address challenges such as cross-language vulnerability detection, multimodal data integration, and repository-level analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-10T21:33:38Z)
• SeCodePLT: A Unified Platform for Evaluating the Security of Code GenAI [58.29510889419971]
  Existing benchmarks for evaluating the security risks and capabilities of code-generating large language models (LLMs) face several key limitations.<n>We introduce a general and scalable benchmark construction framework that begins with manually validated, high-quality seed examples and expands them via targeted mutations.<n>Applying this framework to Python, C/C++, and Java, we build SeCodePLT, a dataset of more than 5.9k samples spanning 44 CWE-based risk categories and three security capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-14T21:17:22Z)
• FaithEval: Can Your Language Model Stay Faithful to Context, Even If "The Moon is Made of Marshmallows" [74.7488607599921]
  FaithEval is a benchmark to evaluate the faithfulness of large language models (LLMs) in contextual scenarios.<n>FaithEval comprises 4.9K high-quality problems in total, validated through a rigorous four-stage context construction and validation framework.<n>Our study reveals that even state-of-the-art models often struggle to remain faithful to the given context, and that larger models do not necessarily exhibit improved faithfulness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-30T06:27:53Z)
• VulnLLMEval: A Framework for Evaluating Large Language Models in Software Vulnerability Detection and Patching [0.9208007322096533]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promise in tasks like code translation. This paper introduces VulnLLMEval, a framework designed to assess the performance of LLMs in identifying and patching vulnerabilities in C code. Our study includes 307 real-world vulnerabilities extracted from the Linux kernel.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-16T22:00:20Z)
• RAGEval: Scenario Specific RAG Evaluation Dataset Generation Framework [66.93260816493553]
  This paper introduces RAGEval, a framework designed to assess RAG systems across diverse scenarios.<n>With a focus on factual accuracy, we propose three novel metrics: Completeness, Hallucination, and Irrelevance.<n> Experimental results show that RAGEval outperforms zero-shot and one-shot methods in terms of clarity, safety, conformity, and richness of generated samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-02T13:35:11Z)
• Exploring Automatic Cryptographic API Misuse Detection in the Era of LLMs [60.32717556756674]
  This paper introduces a systematic evaluation framework to assess Large Language Models in detecting cryptographic misuses. Our in-depth analysis of 11,940 LLM-generated reports highlights that the inherent instabilities in LLMs can lead to over half of the reports being false positives. The optimized approach achieves a remarkable detection rate of nearly 90%, surpassing traditional methods and uncovering previously unknown misuses in established benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-23T15:31:26Z)
• Robust Utility-Preserving Text Anonymization Based on Large Language Models [80.5266278002083]
  Anonymizing text that contains sensitive information is crucial for a wide range of applications.<n>Existing techniques face the emerging challenges of the re-identification ability of large language models.<n>We propose a framework composed of three key components: a privacy evaluator, a utility evaluator, and an optimization component.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T14:28:56Z)
• DiscoveryBench: Towards Data-Driven Discovery with Large Language Models [50.36636396660163]
  We present DiscoveryBench, the first comprehensive benchmark that formalizes the multi-step process of data-driven discovery. Our benchmark contains 264 tasks collected across 6 diverse domains, such as sociology and engineering. Our benchmark, thus, illustrates the challenges in autonomous data-driven discovery and serves as a valuable resource for the community to make progress.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T18:58:22Z)
• DCA-Bench: A Benchmark for Dataset Curation Agents [9.60250892491588]
  Data quality issues, such as incomplete documentation, inaccurate labels, ethical concerns, and outdated information, remain common in widely used datasets.<n>With the surging ability of large language models (LLM), it's promising to streamline the discovery of hidden dataset issues with LLM agents.<n>In this work, we establish a benchmark to measure LLM agent's ability to tackle this challenge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-11T14:02:23Z)
• SafetyPrompts: a Systematic Review of Open Datasets for Evaluating and Improving Large Language Model Safety [27.843894102000608]
  We conduct a first systematic review of open datasets for evaluating and improving large language models (LLMs) safety.<n>We highlight trends, such as a trend towards fully synthetic datasets, as well as gaps in dataset coverage, such as a clear lack of non-English and naturalistic datasets.<n>Our contributions are based on SafetyPrompts.com, a living catalogue of open datasets for LLM safety.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-08T10:57:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.