On the universal definition of intelligence

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.07364v1
• Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 09:39:24 GMT
• Title: On the universal definition of intelligence
• Authors: Joseph Chen,
• Abstract summary: How to compare and evaluate human and AI intelligence has become an important theoretical issue.<n>Existing definitions of intelligence are anthropocentric and unsuitable for empirical comparison.<n>This paper proposes the Extended Predictive Hypothesis (EPH), which views intelligence as a combination of the ability to accurately predict the future and the ability to benefit from those predictions.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This paper aims to propose a universal definition of intelligence that enables fair and consistent comparison of human and artificial intelligence (AI). With the rapid development of AI technology in recent years, how to compare and evaluate human and AI intelligence has become an important theoretical issue. However, existing definitions of intelligence are anthropocentric and unsuitable for empirical comparison, resulting in a lack of consensus in the research field. This paper first introduces four criteria for evaluating intelligence definitions based on R. Carnap's methodology of conceptual clarification: similarity to explicandum, exactness, fruitfulness, and simplicity. We then examine six representative definitions: IQ testing, complex problem-solving ability, reward optimization, environmental adaptation, learning efficiency, and predictive ability, and clarify their theoretical strengths and limitations. The results show that while definitions based on predictive ability have high explanatory power and empirical feasibility, they suffer from an inability to adequately explain the relationship between predictions and behavior/benefits. This paper proposes the Extended Predictive Hypothesis (EPH), which views intelligence as a combination of the ability to accurately predict the future and the ability to benefit from those predictions. Furthermore, by distinguishing predictive ability into spontaneous and reactive predictions and adding the concept of gainability, we present a unified framework for explaining various aspects of intelligence, such as creativity, learning, and future planning. In conclusion, this paper argues that the EPH is the most satisfactory and universal definition for comparing human and AI intelligence.

Related papers

• Beyond Statistical Learning: Exact Learning Is Essential for General Intelligence [59.07578850674114]
  Sound deductive reasoning is an indisputably desirable aspect of general intelligence.<n>It is well-documented that even the most advanced frontier systems regularly and consistently falter on easily-solvable reasoning tasks.<n>We argue that their unsound behavior is a consequence of the statistical learning approach powering their development.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-30T14:37:50Z)
• P: A Universal Measure of Predictive Intelligence [0.0]
  There is no commonly agreed definition of the intelligence that AI systems are said to possess.<n>No-one has developed a practical measure that would enable us to compare the intelligence of humans, animals and AIs on a single ratio scale.<n>This paper sets out a new universal measure of intelligence that is based on the hypothesis that prediction is the most important component of intelligence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-30T10:05:54Z)
• The Trap of Presumed Equivalence: Artificial General Intelligence Should Not Be Assessed on the Scale of Human Intelligence [0.0]
  A traditional approach to assessing emerging intelligence in the theory of intelligent systems is based on the similarity, "imitation" of human-like actions and behaviors. We argue that under some natural assumptions, developing intelligent systems will be able to form their own intents and objectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-14T13:39:58Z)
• Unexplainability of Artificial Intelligence Judgments in Kant's Perspective [0.0]
  This paper investigates the unexplainability of AI judgments through the lens of Kant's theory of judgment.<n> Drawing on Kant's four logical forms-quantity, quality, relation, and modality-this study identifies what may be called AI's uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-12T03:39:55Z)
• Can AI Be as Creative as Humans? [84.43873277557852]
  We prove in theory that AI can be as creative as humans under the condition that it can properly fit the data generated by human creators. The debate on AI's creativity is reduced into the question of its ability to fit a sufficient amount of data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-03T08:49:12Z)
• On a Functional Definition of Intelligence [0.0]
  Without an agreed-upon definition of intelligence, asking "is this system intelligent?"" is an untestable question. Most work on precisely capturing what we mean by "intelligence" has come from the fields of philosophy, psychology, and cognitive science. We present an argument for a purely functional, black-box definition of intelligence, distinct from how that intelligence is actually achieved.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-15T05:46:49Z)
• The Generative AI Paradox: "What It Can Create, It May Not Understand" [81.89252713236746]
  Recent wave of generative AI has sparked excitement and concern over potentially superhuman levels of artificial intelligence. At the same time, models still show basic errors in understanding that would not be expected even in non-expert humans. This presents us with an apparent paradox: how do we reconcile seemingly superhuman capabilities with the persistence of errors that few humans would make?
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-31T18:07:07Z)
• Predictable Artificial Intelligence [77.1127726638209]
  This paper introduces the ideas and challenges of Predictable AI.<n>It explores the ways in which we can anticipate key validity indicators of present and future AI ecosystems.<n>We argue that achieving predictability is crucial for fostering trust, liability, control, alignment and safety of AI ecosystems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-09T21:36:21Z)
• A Theory of Intelligences [0.0]
  I develop a framework that applies across all systems from physics, to biology, humans and AI. I present general equations for intelligence and its components, and a simple expression for the evolution of intelligence traits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-23T20:18:43Z)
• Beyond Interpretable Benchmarks: Contextual Learning through Cognitive and Multimodal Perception [0.0]
  This study contends that the Turing Test is misinterpreted as an attempt to anthropomorphize computer systems. It emphasizes tacit learning as a cornerstone of general-purpose intelligence, despite its lack of overt interpretability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-04T08:30:04Z)
• Abstract Spatial-Temporal Reasoning via Probabilistic Abduction and Execution [97.50813120600026]
  Spatial-temporal reasoning is a challenging task in Artificial Intelligence (AI) Recent works have focused on an abstract reasoning task of this kind -- Raven's Progressive Matrices ( RPM) We propose a neuro-symbolic Probabilistic Abduction and Execution learner (PrAE) learner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-26T02:42:18Z)
• Inductive Biases for Deep Learning of Higher-Level Cognition [108.89281493851358]
  A fascinating hypothesis is that human and animal intelligence could be explained by a few principles. This work considers a larger list, focusing on those which concern mostly higher-level and sequential conscious processing. The objective of clarifying these particular principles is that they could potentially help us build AI systems benefiting from humans' abilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-30T18:29:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.