Bridging the Trust Gap: Clinician-Validated Hybrid Explainable AI for Maternal Health Risk Assessment in Bangladesh

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.07866v1
• Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2026 16:12:38 GMT
• Title: Bridging the Trust Gap: Clinician-Validated Hybrid Explainable AI for Maternal Health Risk Assessment in Bangladesh
• Abstract summary: This study presents a hybrid explainable AI framework combining ante-hoc fuzzy logic with post-hoc SHAP explanations.<n>We developed a fuzzy-XGBoost model on 1,014 maternal health records, achieving 88.67% accuracy.<n>A validation study with 14 healthcare professionals in Bangladesh revealed strong preference for hybrid explanations.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: While machine learning shows promise for maternal health risk prediction, clinical adoption in resource-constrained settings faces a critical barrier: lack of explainability and trust. This study presents a hybrid explainable AI (XAI) framework combining ante-hoc fuzzy logic with post-hoc SHAP explanations, validated through systematic clinician feedback. We developed a fuzzy-XGBoost model on 1,014 maternal health records, achieving 88.67% accuracy (ROC-AUC: 0.9703). A validation study with 14 healthcare professionals in Bangladesh revealed strong preference for hybrid explanations (71.4% across three clinical cases) with 54.8% expressing trust for clinical use. SHAP analysis identified healthcare access as the primary predictor, with the engineered fuzzy risk score ranking third, validating clinical knowledge integration (r=0.298). Clinicians valued integrated clinical parameters but identified critical gaps: obstetric history, gestational age, and connectivity barriers. This work demonstrates that combining interpretable fuzzy rules with feature importance explanations enhances both utility and trust, providing practical insights for XAI deployment in maternal healthcare.

Related papers

• MamaBench: Benchmarking LLM Robustness in Maternal and Child Health Diagnosis through Counterfactual Clinical Perturbation [0.49454229616760287]
  Large language models achieve strong scores on medical benchmarks, yet these benchmarks evaluate each question in isolation.<n>We introduce MamaBench, the first counterfactual benchmark for maternal and paediatric AI.<n>We propose Evidence-Anchored RAG, a three-stage retrieval method that replaces aggregate similarity with an evidence coverage objective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-15T21:56:19Z)
• Explainable AI for Screening Abuse-Related Trauma in Bangladeshi Children: A Training-Free Multimodal Framework Evaluated on Noise-Aware Synthetic Data [0.0]
  Bangladesh has an estimated 1.17 mental-health professionals per 100,000 population and only six child psychiatrists nationwide.<n>No Bengali-language, culturally adapted tool exists for early screening of abuse-related psychological trauma in children.<n>We present ShishuRaksha AI, a decision-support framework that fuses four screening modalities: validated questionnaires (SDQ, CPSS), Bengali narrative text, House-Tree-Person (HTP) drawing features, and facial affect.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-04T20:12:46Z)
• Towards Trustworthy Depression Estimation via Disentangled Evidential Learning [50.22167852149165]
  We propose EviDep, an evidential learning framework that jointly quantifies depression severity.<n>EviDep enforces strict information integrity to guarantee robust evidence synthesis.<n>It achieves state-of-the-art predictive accuracy and superior uncertainty calibration, delivering a robust fail-safe mechanism for trustworthy clinical screening.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-17T13:27:11Z)
• Benchmarking Multi-turn Medical Diagnosis: Hold, Lure, and Self-Correction [72.89352076103889]
  Large language models (LLMs) achieve high accuracy in medical diagnosis when all clinical information is provided in a single turn.<n>We introduce MINT, a high-fidelity, multi-turn medical diagnosis benchmark comprising 1,035 cases.<n>We uncover three persistent behavioral patterns that significantly impact diagnostic decisions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-06T00:23:10Z)
• A Decade-Scale Benchmark Evaluating LLMs' Clinical Practice Guidelines Detection and Adherence in Multi-turn Conversations [60.2076951536797]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in healthcare scenarios.<n>It is unclear to which extend LLMs could identify and adhere to clinical guidelines during conversations.<n>CPGBench is an automated framework benchmarking the clinical guideline detection and adherence capabilities of LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-26T09:00:55Z)
• Cerebra: A Multidisciplinary AI Board for Multimodal Dementia Characterization and Risk Assessment [56.62016795093786]
  Cerebra is an interactive multi-agent AI team that coordinates specialized agents for EHR, clinical notes, and medical imaging analysis.<n>It supports privacy-preserving deployment by operating on structured representations and remains robust when modalities are incomplete.<n>Cerebra significantly improved expert performance, increasing accuracy by 17.5 percentage points in prospective dementia risk estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-23T05:46:45Z)
• Towards Reliable Medical LLMs: Benchmarking and Enhancing Confidence Estimation of Large Language Models in Medical Consultation [97.36081721024728]
  We propose the first benchmark for assessing confidence in multi-turn interaction during realistic medical consultations.<n>Our benchmark unifies three types of medical data for open-ended diagnostic generation.<n>We present MedConf, an evidence-grounded linguistic self-assessment framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-22T04:51:39Z)
• Knowledge-Guided Large Language Model for Automatic Pediatric Dental Record Understanding and Safe Antibiotic Recommendation [0.4779196219827507]
  This study proposes a Knowledge-Guided Large Language Model (KG-LLM)<n>It integrates a pediatric dental knowledge graph, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and a multi-stage safety validation pipeline for evidence-grounded antibiotic recommendation.<n> Experiments on 32,000 de-identified pediatric dental visit records demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-09T21:11:55Z)
• Beyond Traditional Diagnostics: Transforming Patient-Side Information into Predictive Insights with Knowledge Graphs and Prototypes [55.310195121276074]
  We propose a Knowledge graph-enhanced, Prototype-aware, and Interpretable (KPI) framework to predict diseases.<n>It integrates structured and trusted medical knowledge into a unified disease knowledge graph, constructs clinically meaningful disease prototypes, and employs contrastive learning to enhance predictive accuracy.<n>It provides clinically valid explanations that closely align with patient narratives, highlighting its practical value for patient-centered healthcare delivery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-09T05:37:54Z)
• Diagnosing Hallucination Risk in AI Surgical Decision-Support: A Sequential Framework for Sequential Validation [5.469454486414467]
  Large language models (LLMs) offer transformative potential for clinical decision support in spine surgery.<n>LLMs pose significant risks through hallucinations, which are factually inconsistent or contextually misaligned outputs.<n>This study introduces a clinician-centered framework to quantify hallucination risks by evaluating diagnostic precision, recommendation quality, reasoning robustness, output coherence, and knowledge alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-01T15:25:55Z)
• Medical priority fusion: achieving dual optimization of sensitivity and interpretability in nipt anomaly detection [0.0]
  Clinical machine learning faces a critical dilemma in high-stakes medical applications.<n>A paradox becomes particularly acute in non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), where missed chromosomal abnormalities carry profound clinical consequences.<n>We introduce Medical Priority Fusion (MPF), a constrained multi-objective optimization framework that resolves this fundamental trade-off.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-22T15:49:20Z)
• Reducing Large Language Model Safety Risks in Women's Health using Semantic Entropy [29.14930590607661]
  Large language models (LLMs) generate false or misleading outputs, known as hallucinations.<n>Traditional methods for quantifying uncertainty, such as perplexity, fail to capture meaning-level inconsistencies that lead to misinformation.<n>We evaluate semantic entropy (SE), a novel uncertainty metric, to detect hallucinations in AI-generated medical content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-01T00:57:52Z)
• Reasoning-Enhanced Healthcare Predictions with Knowledge Graph Community Retrieval [61.70489848327436]
  KARE is a novel framework that integrates knowledge graph (KG) community-level retrieval with large language models (LLMs) reasoning.<n>Extensive experiments demonstrate that KARE outperforms leading models by up to 10.8-15.0% on MIMIC-III and 12.6-12.7% on MIMIC-IV for mortality and readmission predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-06T18:46:28Z)
• Closing the Gap in High-Risk Pregnancy Care Using Machine Learning and Human-AI Collaboration [8.36613277875556]
  High-risk pregnancy is a pregnancy complicated by factors that can adversely affect the outcomes of the mother or the infant. This work presents the implementation of a real-world ML-based system to assist care managers in identifying pregnant patients at risk of complications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-26T21:08:49Z)
• AutoTrial: Prompting Language Models for Clinical Trial Design [53.630479619856516]
  We present a method named AutoTrial to aid the design of clinical eligibility criteria using language models. Experiments on over 70K clinical trials verify that AutoTrial generates high-quality criteria texts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-19T01:04:16Z)
• Informing clinical assessment by contextualizing post-hoc explanations of risk prediction models in type-2 diabetes [50.8044927215346]
  We consider a comorbidity risk prediction scenario and focus on contexts regarding the patients clinical state. We employ several state-of-the-art LLMs to present contexts around risk prediction model inferences and evaluate their acceptability. Our paper is one of the first end-to-end analyses identifying the feasibility and benefits of contextual explanations in a real-world clinical use case.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-11T18:07:11Z)
• Clinical Outcome Prediction from Admission Notes using Self-Supervised Knowledge Integration [55.88616573143478]
  Outcome prediction from clinical text can prevent doctors from overlooking possible risks. Diagnoses at discharge, procedures performed, in-hospital mortality and length-of-stay prediction are four common outcome prediction targets. We propose clinical outcome pre-training to integrate knowledge about patient outcomes from multiple public sources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-08T10:26:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.