Beyond Linearization: Attributed Table Graphs for Table Reasoning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.08444v1
• Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 11:14:43 GMT
• Title: Beyond Linearization: Attributed Table Graphs for Table Reasoning
• Authors: Yuxiang Wang, Junhao Gan, Shengxiang Gao, Shenghao Ye, Zhengyi Yang, Jianzhong Qi,
• Abstract summary: We propose a training-free model that represents tables as an Attributed Table Graph (ATG)<n>TABGR consistently outperforms state-of-the-art models by up to 9.7% in accuracy.
• Score: 29.473235136449134
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Table reasoning, a task to answer questions by reasoning over data presented in tables, is an important topic due to the prevalence of knowledge stored in tabular formats. Recent solutions use Large Language Models (LLMs), exploiting the semantic understanding and reasoning capabilities of LLMs. A common paradigm of such solutions linearizes tables to form plain texts that are served as input to LLMs. This paradigm has critical issues. It loses table structures, lacks explicit reasoning paths for result explainability, and is subject to the "lost-in-the-middle" issue. To address these issues, we propose Table Graph Reasoner (TABGR), a training-free model that represents tables as an Attributed Table Graph (ATG). The ATG explicitly preserves row-column-cell structures while enabling graph-based reasoning for explainability. We further propose a Question-Guided Personalized PageRank (QG-PPR) mechanism to rerank tabular data and mitigate the lost-in-the-middle issue. Extensive experiments on two commonly used benchmarks show that TABGR consistently outperforms state-of-the-art models by up to 9.7% in accuracy. Our code will be made publicly available upon publication.

Related papers

• Multimodal Tabular Reasoning with Privileged Structured Information [67.40011423365712]
  We introduce TabUlar Reasoning with Bridged infOrmation (sc Turbo)<n>sc Turbo benefits from a structure-aware reasoning trace generator based on DeepSeek-R1.<n>sc Turbo achieves state-of-the-art performance ($+7.2%$ vs. previous SOTA) across multiple datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-04T15:46:30Z)
• RAG over Tables: Hierarchical Memory Index, Multi-Stage Retrieval, and Benchmarking [63.253294691180635]
  In real-world scenarios, beyond pure text, a substantial amount of knowledge is stored in tables.<n>We first propose a table-corpora-aware RAG framework, named T-RAG, which consists of the hierarchical memory index, multi-stage retrieval, and graph-aware prompting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-02T04:24:41Z)
• TableMaster: A Recipe to Advance Table Understanding with Language Models [2.506624215459612]
  TableMaster is a recipe and comprehensive framework that integrates multiple solutions to overcome these obstacles.<n>On the WikiTQ dataset, TableMaster achieves an accuracy of 78.13% using GPT-4o-mini, surpassing existing baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-31T18:31:31Z)
• GraphOTTER: Evolving LLM-based Graph Reasoning for Complex Table Question Answering [19.59852014700167]
  Complex Table Question Answering involves providing accurate answers to specific questions based on intricate tables that exhibit complex layouts and flexible header locations.<n>We propose GraphOTTER that explicitly establishes the reasoning process to pinpoint the correct answers.<n>It then conducts step-by-step reasoning on the graph, with each step guided by a set of pre-defined intermediate reasoning actions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-02T07:49:23Z)
• TableRAG: Million-Token Table Understanding with Language Models [53.039560091592215]
  TableRAG is a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) framework specifically designed for LM-based table understanding.<n>TableRAG leverages query expansion combined with schema and cell retrieval to pinpoint crucial information before providing it to the LMs.<n>Our results demonstrate that TableRAG achieves the highest retrieval quality, leading to the new state-of-the-art performance on large-scale table understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-07T04:15:02Z)
• Chain-of-Table: Evolving Tables in the Reasoning Chain for Table Understanding [79.9461269253121]
  We propose the Chain-of-Table framework, where tabular data is explicitly used in the reasoning chain as a proxy for intermediate thoughts. Chain-of-Table achieves new state-of-the-art performance on WikiTQ, FeTaQA, and TabFact benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-09T07:46:26Z)
• TAP4LLM: Table Provider on Sampling, Augmenting, and Packing Semi-structured Data for Large Language Model Reasoning [55.33939289989238]
  We propose TAP4LLM as a versatile pre-processor suite for leveraging large language models (LLMs) in table-based tasks effectively. It covers several distinct components: (1) table sampling to decompose large tables into manageable sub-tables based on query semantics, (2) table augmentation to enhance tables with additional knowledge from external sources or models, and (3) table packing & serialization to convert tables into various formats suitable for LLMs' understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-14T15:37:04Z)
• Doc2SoarGraph: Discrete Reasoning over Visually-Rich Table-Text Documents via Semantic-Oriented Hierarchical Graphs [79.0426838808629]
  We propose TAT-DQA, i.e. to answer the question over a visually-rich table-text document. Specifically, we propose a novel Doc2SoarGraph framework with enhanced discrete reasoning capability. We conduct extensive experiments on TAT-DQA dataset, and the results show that our proposed framework outperforms the best baseline model by 17.73% and 16.91% in terms of Exact Match (EM) and F1 score respectively on the test set.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-03T07:30:32Z)
• Table Retrieval May Not Necessitate Table-specific Model Design [83.27735758203089]
  We focus on the task of table retrieval, and ask: "is table-specific model design necessary for table retrieval?" Based on an analysis on a table-based portion of the Natural Questions dataset (NQ-table), we find that structure plays a negligible role in more than 70% of the cases. We then experiment with three modules to explicitly encode table structures, namely auxiliary row/column embeddings, hard attention masks, and soft relation-based attention biases. None of these yielded significant improvements, suggesting that table-specific model design may not be necessary for table retrieval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-19T20:35:23Z)
• TableFormer: Robust Transformer Modeling for Table-Text Encoding [18.00127368618485]
  Existing models for table understanding require linearization of the table structure, where row or column order is encoded as an unwanted bias. In this work, we propose a robust and structurally aware table-text encoding architecture TableFormer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-01T07:23:06Z)
• TGRNet: A Table Graph Reconstruction Network for Table Structure Recognition [76.06530816349763]
  We propose an end-to-end trainable table graph reconstruction network (TGRNet) for table structure recognition. Specifically, the proposed method has two main branches, a cell detection branch and a cell logical location branch, to jointly predict the spatial location and the logical location of different cells.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-20T01:57:05Z)
• Retrieving Complex Tables with Multi-Granular Graph Representation Learning [20.72341939868327]
  The task of natural language table retrieval seeks to retrieve semantically relevant tables based on natural language queries. Existing learning systems treat tables as plain text based on the assumption that tables are structured as dataframes. We propose Graph-based Table Retrieval (GTR), a generalizable NLTR framework with multi-granular graph representation learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-04T20:19:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.