On the Probability of First Success in Differential Evolution: Hazard Identities and Tail Bounds
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.11499v1
- Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2026 18:24:24 GMT
- Title: On the Probability of First Success in Differential Evolution: Hazard Identities and Tail Bounds
- Authors: Dimitar Nedanovski, Svetoslav Nenov, Dimitar Pilev,
- Abstract summary: We study first-hitting times in Differential Evolution (DE) through a conditional hazard frame work.<n>For the L-SHADE algorithm with current-to-$p$best/1 mutation, we construct a checkable algorithmic witness event $mathcal L_t$ under which the conditional hazard admits an explicit lower bound.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: We study first-hitting times in Differential Evolution (DE) through a conditional hazard frame work. Instead of analyzing convergence via Markov-chain transition kernels or drift arguments, we ex press the survival probability of a measurable target set $A$ as a product of conditional first-hit probabilities (hazards) $p_t=\Prob(E_t\mid\mathcal F_{t-1})$. This yields distribution-free identities for survival and explicit tail bounds whenever deterministic lower bounds on the hazard hold on the survival event. For the L-SHADE algorithm with current-to-$p$best/1 mutation, we construct a checkable algorithmic witness event $\mathcal L_t$ under which the conditional hazard admits an explicit lower bound depending only on sampling rules, population size, and crossover statistics. This separates theoretical constants from empirical event frequencies and explains why worst-case constant-hazard bounds are typically conservative. We complement the theory with a Kaplan--Meier survival analysis on the CEC2017 benchmark suite . Across functions and budgets, we identify three distinct empirical regimes: (i) strongly clustered success, where hitting times concentrate in short bursts; (ii) approximately geometric tails, where a constant-hazard model is accurate; and (iii) intractable cases with no observed hits within the evaluation horizon. The results show that while constant-hazard bounds provide valid tail envelopes, the practical behavior of L-SHADE is governed by burst-like transitions rather than homogeneous per-generati on success probabilities.
Related papers
- Fixed-Horizon Self-Normalized Inference for Adaptive Experiments via Martingale AIPW/DML with Logged Propensities [0.0]
Under adaptive assignment, propensities can keep changing, so the predictable quadratic variation of AIPW/DML increments may remain random.<n>We show that the Studentized statistic, with variance estimated by realized quadratic variation, is conditionally miscalibrated even without variance stabilization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-17T13:12:31Z) - Unregularized Linear Convergence in Zero-Sum Game from Preference Feedback [50.89125374999765]
We provide the first convergence guarantee for Optimistic Multiplicative Weights Update ($mathtOMWU$) in NLHF.<n>Our analysis identifies a novel marginal convergence behavior, where the probability of rarely played actions grows exponentially from exponentially small values.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-31T12:08:29Z) - From Tail Universality to Bernstein-von Mises: A Unified Statistical Theory of Semi-Implicit Variational Inference [0.12183405753834557]
Semi-implicit variational inference (SIVI) constructs approximate posteriors of the form $q() = int k(| z) r(dz)$<n>This paper develops a unified "approximation-optimization-statistics'' theory for such families.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-05T19:26:25Z) - Statistical Inference under Adaptive Sampling with LinUCB [15.167069362020426]
We show that the linear upper confidence bound (LinUCB) algorithm for linear bandits satisfies a property called stability.<n>We establish a central limit theorem for the LinUCB algorithm, establishing normality for the limiting distribution of the estimation error.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-28T21:48:18Z) - Understanding Robust Machine Learning for Nonparametric Regression with Heavy-Tailed Noise [10.844819221753042]
We use Huber regression as a close-up example within Tikhonov-regularized risk minimization.<n>We address two central challenges: (i) the breakdown of standard concentration tools under weak moment assumptions, and (ii) the analytical difficulties introduced by unbounded hypothesis spaces.<n>Our study delivers principled rules, extends beyond Huber to other robust losses, and highlights prediction error, not excess risk, as the fundamental lens for analyzing robust learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-10T21:57:18Z) - Quantitative Convergence Analysis of Projected Stochastic Gradient Descent for Non-Convex Losses via the Goldstein Subdifferential [2.179637644332717]
This paper presents an analysis of projected variance reduction for non-symotic convergence measures.<n> Convergence is a gradient to the SGD Goldstein subdifferential gradient by the constraints.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-03T05:35:42Z) - Generalisation and benign over-fitting for linear regression onto random functional covariates [4.344644788142548]
We study theoretical predictive performance of ridge and ridge-less least-squares regression.<n>We derive convergence rates in regimes where $p$ grows fast relative to $n$.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-19T15:01:20Z) - Federated Learning Resilient to Byzantine Attacks and Data Heterogeneity [59.17297282373628]
This paper addresses Gradient learning (FL) in the context of malicious attacks on data.<n>We introduce a novel Average Robust Algorithm (RAGA) which uses the median for both convergence analysis and loss functions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-20T08:15:08Z) - Near-Optimal Non-Parametric Sequential Tests and Confidence Sequences
with Possibly Dependent Observations [44.71254888821376]
We provide the first type-I-error and expected-rejection-time guarantees under general non-data generating processes.
We show how to apply our results to inference on parameters defined by estimating equations, such as average treatment effects.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-29T18:37:08Z) - High Probability Bounds for a Class of Nonconvex Algorithms with AdaGrad
Stepsize [55.0090961425708]
We propose a new, simplified high probability analysis of AdaGrad for smooth, non- probability problems.
We present our analysis in a modular way and obtain a complementary $mathcal O (1 / TT)$ convergence rate in the deterministic setting.
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first high probability for AdaGrad with a truly adaptive scheme, i.e., completely oblivious to the knowledge of smoothness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-06T13:50:33Z) - Optimal policy evaluation using kernel-based temporal difference methods [78.83926562536791]
We use kernel Hilbert spaces for estimating the value function of an infinite-horizon discounted Markov reward process.
We derive a non-asymptotic upper bound on the error with explicit dependence on the eigenvalues of the associated kernel operator.
We prove minimax lower bounds over sub-classes of MRPs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-24T14:48:20Z) - A Unifying Theory of Thompson Sampling for Continuous Risk-Averse
Bandits [91.3755431537592]
This paper unifies the analysis of risk-averse Thompson sampling algorithms for the multi-armed bandit problem.
Using the contraction principle in the theory of large deviations, we prove novel concentration bounds for continuous risk functionals.
We show that a wide class of risk functionals as well as "nice" functions of them satisfy the continuity condition.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-08-25T17:09:01Z) - Multivariate Probabilistic Regression with Natural Gradient Boosting [63.58097881421937]
We propose a Natural Gradient Boosting (NGBoost) approach based on nonparametrically modeling the conditional parameters of the multivariate predictive distribution.
Our method is robust, works out-of-the-box without extensive tuning, is modular with respect to the assumed target distribution, and performs competitively in comparison to existing approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-07T17:44:49Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.