On Nonasymptotic Confidence Intervals for Treatment Effects in Randomized Experiments

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.11744v2
• Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 17:17:49 GMT
• Title: On Nonasymptotic Confidence Intervals for Treatment Effects in Randomized Experiments
• Authors: Ricardo J. Sandoval, Sivaraman Balakrishnan, Avi Feller, Michael I. Jordan, Ian Waudby-Smith,
• Abstract summary: We study nonasymptotic (finite-sample) confidence intervals for treatment effects in randomized experiments.<n>We show that this performance gap can be closed, designing nonasymptotic confidence intervals that have the same effective sample size as their counterparts.<n>We also show that the nonasymptotic rates that we achieve are unimprovable in an information-theoretic sense.
• Score: 45.83633072085246
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We study nonasymptotic (finite-sample) confidence intervals for treatment effects in randomized experiments. In the existing literature, the effective sample sizes of nonasymptotic confidence intervals tend to be looser than the corresponding central-limit-theorem-based confidence intervals by a factor depending on the square root of the propensity score. We show that this performance gap can be closed, designing nonasymptotic confidence intervals that have the same effective sample size as their asymptotic counterparts. Our approach involves systematic exploitation of negative dependence or variance adaptivity (or both). We also show that the nonasymptotic rates that we achieve are unimprovable in an information-theoretic sense.

Related papers

• Simulation-Based Inference for Adaptive Experiments [38.841210420855276]
  Multi-arm bandit experimental designs are increasingly being adopted over standard randomized trials.<n>We propose a simulation-based approach for conducting hypothesis tests and constructing confidence intervals for arm specific means.<n>Our results show that our approach achieves the desired coverage while reducing confidence interval widths by up to 50%, with drastic improvements for arms not targeted by the design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-03T13:46:59Z)
• Semiparametric Efficient Inference in Adaptive Experiments [29.43493007296859]
  We consider the problem of efficient inference of the Average Treatment Effect in a sequential experiment where the policy governing the assignment of subjects to treatment or control can change over time. We first provide a central limit theorem for the Adaptive Augmented Inverse-Probability Weighted estimator, which is semi efficient, under weaker assumptions than those previously made in the literature. We then consider sequential inference setting, deriving both propensity and nonasymptotic confidence sequences that are considerably tighter than previous methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-30T06:25:06Z)
• Near-Optimal Non-Parametric Sequential Tests and Confidence Sequences with Possibly Dependent Observations [44.71254888821376]
  We provide the first type-I-error and expected-rejection-time guarantees under general non-data generating processes. We show how to apply our results to inference on parameters defined by estimating equations, such as average treatment effects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-29T18:37:08Z)
• Statistical Efficiency of Score Matching: The View from Isoperimetry [96.65637602827942]
  We show a tight connection between statistical efficiency of score matching and the isoperimetric properties of the distribution being estimated. We formalize these results both in the sample regime and in the finite regime.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-03T06:09:01Z)
• Data-Driven Influence Functions for Optimization-Based Causal Inference [105.5385525290466]
  We study a constructive algorithm that approximates Gateaux derivatives for statistical functionals by finite differencing. We study the case where probability distributions are not known a priori but need to be estimated from data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-29T16:16:22Z)
• Treatment Effect Risk: Bounds and Inference [58.442274475425144]
  Since the average treatment effect measures the change in social welfare, even if positive, there is a risk of negative effect on, say, some 10% of the population. In this paper we consider how to nonetheless assess this important risk measure, formalized as the conditional value at risk (CVaR) of the ITE distribution. Some bounds can also be interpreted as summarizing a complex CATE function into a single metric and are of interest independently of being a bound.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-15T17:21:26Z)
• Time-uniform central limit theory and asymptotic confidence sequences [34.00292366598841]
  Confidence sequences (CS) provide valid inference at arbitrary stopping times and incur no penalties for "peeking" at the data. CSs are nonasymptotic, enjoying finite-sample guarantees but not the aforementioned broad applicability of confidence intervals. Asymptotic CSs forgo nonasymptotic validity for CLT-like versatility and (asymptotic) time-uniform guarantees.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-11T05:45:35Z)
• Asymptotics of the Empirical Bootstrap Method Beyond Asymptotic Normality [25.402400996745058]
  We show that the limiting distribution of the empirical bootstrap estimator is consistent under stability conditions. We propose three alternative ways to use the bootstrap method to build confidence intervals with coverage guarantees.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-23T07:14:30Z)
• CoinDICE: Off-Policy Confidence Interval Estimation [107.86876722777535]
  We study high-confidence behavior-agnostic off-policy evaluation in reinforcement learning. We show in a variety of benchmarks that the confidence interval estimates are tighter and more accurate than existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-22T12:39:11Z)
• Uncertainty quantification for nonconvex tensor completion: Confidence intervals, heteroscedasticity and optimality [92.35257908210316]
  We study the problem of estimating a low-rank tensor given incomplete and corrupted observations. We find that it attains unimprovable rates $ell-2$ accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-15T17:47:13Z)
• Conformal Inference of Counterfactuals and Individual Treatment Effects [6.810856082577402]
  We propose a conformal inference-based approach that can produce reliable interval estimates for counterfactuals and individual treatment effects. Existing methods suffer from a significant coverage deficit even in simple models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-11T01:03:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.