The burden of Fundamentality: Metaphysical ambiguities and the issue of Superdeterminism

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.14316v1
• Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 12:38:54 GMT
• Title: The burden of Fundamentality: Metaphysical ambiguities and the issue of Superdeterminism
• Authors: Gabriele Cafiero, Luca Molinari, Jonte R. Hance,
• Abstract summary: We argue how nave (NSD) and metaphysical (MSD) superdeterministic theories present significant flaws.<n>We show how NSD justifies itself through claims to fundamentality, thus connoting itself as a metaphysical theory rather than a scientific one.<n>Our paper thus reinforces the thesis that theories should demonstrate rather than assume fundamentality and that it is methodologically flawed for a theory to assume its own fundamentality for the sole purpose of defending against criticisms.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: In this paper we approach the problem of superdeterminism from a novel point of view, highlighting its character as a more metaphysical than scientific proposition. First, we introduce a distinction between two types of superdeterministic theories, naïve (NSD) and metaphysical (MSD), and argue how NSD presents significant epistemic flaws. We show how NSD justifies itself through claims to fundamentality, thus connoting itself as a metaphysical theory rather than a scientific one. We finally illustrate that the most developed MSD model so far, Invariant Set Theory, implicitly proposes a confused form of priority monism. Our paper thus reinforces the thesis that theories should demonstrate rather than assume fundamentality and that it is methodologically flawed for a theory to assume its own fundamentality for the sole purpose of defending against criticisms.

Related papers

• Realism and Ontology in Quantum Mechanics and String Theory [0.0]
  Dualities in physics have challenged traditional forms of scientific realism.<n>We argue that ontological commitment should be treated as tied to specific empirical contexts.<n>We show how our view accommodates ontological pluralism while preserving a robust form of structural realism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-18T23:31:13Z)
• Relaxation of first-class constraints and the quantization of gauge theories: from "matter without matter" to the reappearance of time in quantum gravity [72.27323884094953]
  We make a conceptual overview of an approach to the initial-value problem in canonical gauge theories. We stress how the first-class phase-space constraints may be relaxed if we interpret them as fixing the values of new degrees of freedom.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-19T19:00:02Z)
• The roads to non-individuals (and how not to read their maps) [0.0]
  We argue that neither non-individuality nor individuality is not to be found imposed on us in any of these levels so that it should be seen as a metaphysical addition to the theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-22T11:57:09Z)
• A Category-theoretical Meta-analysis of Definitions of Disentanglement [97.34033555407403]
  Disentangling the factors of variation in data is a fundamental concept in machine learning. This paper presents a meta-analysis of existing definitions of disentanglement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-11T15:24:20Z)
• Quantum Theory Needs (And Probably Has) Real Reduction [0.0]
  It appears that for quantum theory to be viable in a realist sense, it must possess genuine, physical non-unitarity. Penrose's theory of gravitation-induced collapse and the Transactional Interpretation are discussed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-20T21:25:23Z)
• Intrinsic Physical Concepts Discovery with Object-Centric Predictive Models [86.25460882547581]
  We introduce the PHYsical Concepts Inference NEtwork (PHYCINE), a system that infers physical concepts in different abstract levels without supervision. We show that object representations containing the discovered physical concepts variables could help achieve better performance in causal reasoning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-03T11:52:21Z)
• A dialog on the fate of information in black hole evaporation [77.34726150561087]
  We present two alternative perspectives for the resolution of Hawking's information puzzle in black hole evaporation. One of them is the central role played by the existence of the interior singularity that we expect to be replaced by a more fundamental quantum gravity formulation. Both views rely on the notion that the standard effective quantum field theoretic perspective would require some deep modifications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-17T16:21:22Z)
• Quantum realism: axiomatization and quantification [77.34726150561087]
  We build an axiomatization for quantum realism -- a notion of realism compatible with quantum theory. We explicitly construct some classes of entropic quantifiers that are shown to satisfy almost all of the proposed axioms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-10T18:08:42Z)
• Realism and metaphysics in quantum mechanics [0.0]
  According to scientific realism, science gives us an approximately true description of what the world is like. We focus on the ontological and metaphysical aspects of this discussion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-05T16:33:56Z)
• Measuring Quantum Superpositions (Or, "It is only the theory which decides what can be observed.") [0.0]
  We argue that the ad hoc introduction of the projection postulate (or measurement rule) can be understood as a necessary requirement coming from a naive empiricist standpoint. We discuss the general physical conditions for measuring and observing quantum superpositions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-02T14:30:56Z)
• Perfect Discrimination in Approximate Quantum Theory of General Probabilistic Theories [51.7367238070864]
  We define larger measurement classes that are smoothly connected with the class of POVMs via a parameter. We give a sufficient condition of perfect discrimination, which shows a significant improvement beyond the class of POVMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-10T08:45:20Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.