Realism and metaphysics in quantum mechanics

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2012.03071v2
• Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 14:57:20 GMT
• Title: Realism and metaphysics in quantum mechanics
• Authors: Raoni Wohnrath Arroyo and Jonas R. B. Arenhart
• Abstract summary: According to scientific realism, science gives us an approximately true description of what the world is like. We focus on the ontological and metaphysical aspects of this discussion.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: According to scientific realism, science gives us an approximately true description of what the world is like. But what does it mean? In this chapter, we focus on the ontological and metaphysical aspects of this discussion. That is, we are concerned with the following questions: what there is, according to our best scientific theories? And how are these things that theories say exist? We start from the assumption that a genuine scientific realism must deal with these issues. Taking non-relativistic quantum mechanics as a case study, we discuss some of the challenges currently faced by a genuinely realistic stance. We argue, first, that in the ontological aspect, realists are in the same boat as science, that is, without sufficient epistemic justification to adopt the belief in the entities postulated by a single quantum theory, given that experience (currently) is not able to decide between rival theories; in the metaphysical aspect, realists also encounter problems with theory choice, given the possibility of associating more than one metaphysical theory with the description of the entities postulated by each quantum theory. The same goes for structuralist alternatives, since, even if we accept that scientific theories are committed to the existence of structures, but not objects, we still do not know what structures are, metaphysically. Finally, we move forward in the discussion with the meta-Popperian method, which serves to reduce the metaphysical alternatives associated with the ontological postulates of scientific theories. We may not know what the correct alternative is, but we have been able to progressively check which metaphysical alternatives are incompatible with each scientific theory.

Related papers

• The two-spin enigma: from the helium atom to quantum ontology [1.6777183511743472]
  We will show that it perfectly fits with empirical evidence, and can be maintained without giving up physical realism. We will start from experimentally based evidence in order to analyse and explain physical facts, moving cautiously from a classical to a quantum description, without mixing them up. The overall picture will be that the physical properties of microscopic systems are quantized, as initially shown by Planck and Einstein, and they are also contextual, i.e. that they can be given a physical sense only by embedding a microscopic system within a macroscopic measurement context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-07T09:43:30Z)
• Unexpected Quantum Indeterminacy [0.0]
  I argue that there are various questions about worldly states of affairs that cannot be determined by looking exclusively at their philosophical and dynamical laws. It will be concluded that ontological clarity and indeterminacy are not mutually exclusive, i.e., the two can coexist in the same theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-11T10:30:09Z)
• Quantum ontology de-naturalized: What we can't learn from quantum mechanics [0.0]
  Philosophers of science commonly connect ontology and science, stating that these disciplines maintain a two-way relationship. We will critically examine the process of naturalizing ontology, i.e., confining the work of ontologists merely to the task of pointing out which entities certain theories commit themselves to.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-08T13:26:13Z)
• Quantum Field Theories, Topological Materials, and Topological Quantum Computing [3.553493344868414]
  A quantum computer can perform exponentially faster than its classical counterpart. Topology and knot theory, geometric phases, topological materials, topological quantum field theories, recoupling theory, and category theory are discussed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-20T15:12:44Z)
• On scientific understanding with artificial intelligence [2.2911874889696775]
  We seek advice from the philosophy of science to understand scientific understanding. Then we collect dozens of anecdotes from scientists about how they acquired new conceptual understanding with the help of computers. For each dimension, we explain new avenues to push beyond the status quo.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-04T13:45:13Z)
• The (meta)metaphysics of science: the case of non-relativistic quantum mechanics [0.0]
  Traditionally, to be a realist about something means believing in the independent existence of that something. We discuss how two fashionable approaches face the challenge of providing a metaphysics for science. We present the meta-Popperian method, a metametaphysical method capable of objectively assessing which metaphysical profiles are incompatible with certain theories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-01T18:55:44Z)
• Towards Noncommutative Quantum Reality [0.0]
  The implications of the physical theory of quantum mechanics on the question of realism is much a subject of sustaining interest. We give here a picture of quantum mechanics as the basic theory for nonrelativistic' particle dynamics. The key is to fully embrace the noncommutativity of the theory and see it as a notion about the reality of physical quantities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-19T10:27:23Z)
• Quantum realism: axiomatization and quantification [77.34726150561087]
  We build an axiomatization for quantum realism -- a notion of realism compatible with quantum theory. We explicitly construct some classes of entropic quantifiers that are shown to satisfy almost all of the proposed axioms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-10T18:08:42Z)
• Testing quantum theory with thought experiments [4.847980206213335]
  How should one model systems that include agents who are themselves using quantum theory? We give a state-of-the-art overview on quantum thought experiments involving observers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-09T18:08:23Z)
• Floating free from physics: the metaphysics of quantum mechanics [0.0]
  We argue that, in this perspective, metaphysics must be understood as an autonomous discipline. One of the main motivations of such project is the obtaining of a scientifically respectable justification for the attribution of a single true metaphysical profile to the posits of a scientific theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-10T16:53:21Z)
• The measurement problem revisited [1.8411084141397314]
  The measurement problem of quantum mechanics is essentially the determinate-experience problem. The physical state representing the measurement result is required to be also the physical state on which an observer supervenes. It is argued that the forms of psychophysical connection required by Everett's and Bohm's theories have potential problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-25T04:46:54Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.