AI Agents vs. Human Investigators: Balancing Automation, Security, and Expertise in Cyber Forensic Analysis

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.14544v1
• Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 23:52:32 GMT
• Title: AI Agents vs. Human Investigators: Balancing Automation, Security, and Expertise in Cyber Forensic Analysis
• Authors: Sneha Sudhakaran, Naresh Kshetri,
• Abstract summary: AI agents are being adopted across digital forensic practices due to their ability to automate processes such as anomaly detection, evidence classification, and behavioral pattern recognition.<n>However, the characteristics that make AI indispensable also introduce notable risks.<n>This study presents a comparative analysis of the effectiveness of the most used AI agent, ChatGPT, and human forensic investigators.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In an era where cyber threats are rapidly evolving, the reliability of cyber forensic analysis has become increasingly critical for effective digital investigations and cybersecurity responses. AI agents are being adopted across digital forensic practices due to their ability to automate processes such as anomaly detection, evidence classification, and behavioral pattern recognition, significantly enhancing scalability and reducing investigation timelines. However, the characteristics that make AI indispensable also introduce notable risks. AI systems, often trained on biased or incomplete datasets, can produce misleading results, including false positives and false negatives, thereby jeopardizing the integrity of forensic investigations. This study presents a meticulous comparative analysis of the effectiveness of the most used AI agent, ChatGPT, and human forensic investigators in the realm of cyber forensic analysis. Our research reveals critical limitations within AI-driven approaches, demonstrating scenarios in which sophisticated or novel cyber threats remain undetected due to the rigid pattern-based nature of AI systems. Conversely, our analysis highlights the crucial role that human forensic investigators play in mitigating these risks. Through adaptive decision-making, ethical reasoning, and contextual understanding, human investigators effectively identify subtle anomalies and threats that may evade automated detection systems. To reinforce our findings, we conducted comprehensive reliability testing of forensic techniques using multiple cyber threat scenarios. These tests confirmed that while AI agents significantly improve the efficiency of routine analyses, human oversight remains crucial in ensuring accuracy and comprehensiveness of the results.

Related papers

• The Verification Crisis: Expert Perceptions of GenAI Disinformation and the Case for Reproducible Provenance [47.03825808787752]
  This article presents findings from the first wave of a longitudinal expert perception survey (N=21) involving AI researchers, policymakers, and disinformation specialists.<n>It examines the perceived severity of multimodal threats -- text, image, audio, and video -- and evaluates current mitigation strategies.<n>Results indicate that while deepfake video presents immediate "shock" value, large-scale text generation poses a systemic risk of "epistemic fragmentation"
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-02T13:45:12Z)
• Industrialized Deception: The Collateral Effects of LLM-Generated Misinformation on Digital Ecosystems [47.03825808787752]
  This paper transitions from literature review to practical countermeasures.<n>We report on improved AI-generated content through Large Language Models (LLMs) and multimodal systems.<n>We discuss mitigation strategies including LLM-based detection, inoculation approaches, and the dual-use nature of generative AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-29T16:42:22Z)
• Toward Risk Thresholds for AI-Enabled Cyber Threats: Enhancing Decision-Making Under Uncertainty with Bayesian Networks [0.3151064009829256]
  We propose a structured approach to developing and evaluating AI cyber risk thresholds.<n>First, we analyze existing industry cyber thresholds and identify common threshold elements.<n>Second, we propose the use of Bayesian networks as a tool for modeling AI-enabled cyber risk.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-23T23:23:12Z)
• Enhancing IoMT Security with Explainable Machine Learning: A Case Study on the CICIOMT2024 Dataset [0.0]
  Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) enhances the transparency and interpretability of AI models.<n>In cybersecurity, particularly within the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT), the black-box nature of AI-driven threat detection poses a significant challenge.<n>This study compares two ensemble learning techniques, bagging and boosting, for cyber-attack classification in IoMT environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-10T09:17:46Z)
• Deep Learning Models for Robust Facial Liveness Detection [56.08694048252482]
  This study introduces a robust solution through novel deep learning models addressing the deficiencies in contemporary anti-spoofing techniques.<n>By innovatively integrating texture analysis and reflective properties associated with genuine human traits, our models distinguish authentic presence from replicas with remarkable precision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-12T17:19:20Z)
• Expert-in-the-Loop Systems with Cross-Domain and In-Domain Few-Shot Learning for Software Vulnerability Detection [38.083049237330826]
  This study explores the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) in software vulnerability assessment by simulating the identification of Python code with known Common Weaknessions (CWEs)<n>Our results indicate that while zero-shot prompting performs poorly, few-shot prompting significantly enhances classification performance.<n> challenges such as model reliability, interpretability, and adversarial robustness remain critical areas for future research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-11T18:43:51Z)
• Real-Time Detection of Insider Threats Using Behavioral Analytics and Deep Evidential Clustering [0.0]
  We propose a novel framework for real-time detection of insider threats using behavioral analytics combined with deep evidential clustering.<n>Our system captures and analyzes user activities, applies context-rich behavioral features, and classifies potential threats.<n>We evaluate our framework on benchmark insider threat datasets such as CERT and TWOS, achieving an average detection accuracy of 94.7% and a 38% reduction in false positives compared to traditional clustering methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T11:21:33Z)
• Bringing Order Amidst Chaos: On the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Secure Software Engineering [0.0]
  The ever-evolving technological landscape offers both opportunities and threats, creating a dynamic space where chaos and order compete.<n>Secure software engineering (SSE) must continuously address vulnerabilities that endanger software systems.<n>This thesis seeks to bring order to the chaos in SSE by addressing domain-specific differences that impact AI accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-09T11:38:58Z)
• Countering Autonomous Cyber Threats [40.00865970939829]
  Foundation Models present dual-use concerns broadly and within the cyber domain specifically. Recent research has shown the potential for these advanced models to inform or independently execute offensive cyberspace operations. This work evaluates several state-of-the-art FMs on their ability to compromise machines in an isolated network and investigates defensive mechanisms to defeat such AI-powered attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-23T22:46:44Z)
• Harnessing AI for efficient analysis of complex policy documents: a case study of Executive Order 14110 [44.99833362998488]
  Policy documents, such as legislation, regulations, and executive orders, are crucial in shaping society. This study aims to evaluate the potential of AI in streamlining policy analysis and to identify the strengths and limitations of current AI approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-10T11:19:28Z)
• Testing autonomous vehicles and AI: perspectives and challenges from cybersecurity, transparency, robustness and fairness [53.91018508439669]
  The study explores the complexities of integrating Artificial Intelligence into Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) It examines the challenges introduced by AI components and the impact on testing procedures. The paper identifies significant challenges and suggests future directions for research and development of AI in AV technology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T08:29:42Z)
• A Comprehensive Analysis of the Role of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Modern Digital Forensics and Incident Response [0.0]
  The goal is to look closely at how AI and ML techniques are used in digital forensics and incident response. This endeavour digs far beneath the surface to unearth the intricate ways AI-driven methodologies are shaping these crucial facets of digital forensics practice. Ultimately, this paper underscores the significance of AI and ML integration in digital forensics, offering insights into their benefits, drawbacks, and broader implications for tackling modern cyber threats.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-13T16:23:53Z)
• Sufficient Reasons for A Zero-Day Intrusion Detection Artificial Immune System [40.31029890303761]
  Interpretability and transparency of the machine learning model is the foundation of trust in AI-driven intrusion detection results. This paper proposed a rigorous interpretable Artificial Intelligence driven intrusion detection approach, based on artificial immune system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-05T14:46:08Z)
• Adversarial Interaction Attack: Fooling AI to Misinterpret Human Intentions [46.87576410532481]
  We show that, despite their current huge success, deep learning based AI systems can be easily fooled by subtle adversarial noise. Based on a case study of skeleton-based human interactions, we propose a novel adversarial attack on interactions. Our study highlights potential risks in the interaction loop with AI and humans, which need to be carefully addressed when deploying AI systems in safety-critical applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-17T16:23:20Z)
• Adversarial vs behavioural-based defensive AI with joint, continual and active learning: automated evaluation of robustness to deception, poisoning and concept drift [62.997667081978825]
  Recent advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI) have brought new capabilities to behavioural analysis (UEBA) for cyber-security. In this paper, we present a solution to effectively mitigate this attack by improving the detection process and efficiently leveraging human expertise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-13T13:54:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.