Communication-Efficient Federated Risk Difference Estimation for Time-to-Event Clinical Outcomes

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.14609v1
• Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2026 02:59:30 GMT
• Title: Communication-Efficient Federated Risk Difference Estimation for Time-to-Event Clinical Outcomes
• Abstract summary: FedRD is a communication-efficient framework for federated risk difference estimation in distributed survival data.<n>It provides valid confidence intervals and hypothesis testing--capabilities absent in FedAvg-based frameworks.<n>FedRD outperforms local and federated baselines in both estimation and prediction performance.
• Score: 6.902175525401806
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Privacy-preserving model co-training in medical research is often hindered by server-dependent architectures incompatible with protected hospital data systems and by the predominant focus on relative effect measures (hazard ratios) which lack clinical interpretability for absolute survival risk assessment. We propose FedRD, a communication-efficient framework for federated risk difference estimation in distributed survival data. Unlike typical federated learning frameworks (e.g., FedAvg) that require persistent server connections and extensive iterative communication, FedRD is server-independent with minimal communication: one round of summary statistics exchange for the stratified model and three rounds for the unstratified model. Crucially, FedRD provides valid confidence intervals and hypothesis testing--capabilities absent in FedAvg-based frameworks. We provide theoretical guarantees by establishing the asymptotic properties of FedRD and prove that FedRD (unstratified) is asymptotically equivalent to pooled individual-level analysis. Simulation studies and real-world clinical applications across different countries demonstrate that FedRD outperforms local and federated baselines in both estimation accuracy and prediction performance, providing an architecturally feasible solution for absolute risk assessment in privacy-restricted, multi-site clinical studies.

Related papers

• Federated Survival Analysis in Healthcare: A Multi-Model Evaluation on Cross-Institutional Heterogeneous Breast Cancer Data [0.6480963852869791]
  Federated learning (FL) offers a privacy-preserving alternative by training shared models without exchanging raw data.<n>Three survival models, the Cox Proportional Hazards model, DeepSurv, and Random Survival Forest (RSF), are compared across centralized, local, and federated training.<n>We derive practical, decision-oriented guidelines mapping data, privacy, interpretability, and resource constraints to recommended model and training-paradigm choices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-22T19:14:51Z)
• Federated Learning for Multi-Center Sepsis Early Prediction with Privacy-Preserving [9.744444068585983]
  Federated learning allows multiple institutions to jointly train predictive models without directly sharing or centralizing raw data.<n>This study systematically examines the application of federated learning to multi-center sepsis prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-03T01:35:17Z)
• Towards Trustworthy Depression Estimation via Disentangled Evidential Learning [50.22167852149165]
  We propose EviDep, an evidential learning framework that jointly quantifies depression severity.<n>EviDep enforces strict information integrity to guarantee robust evidence synthesis.<n>It achieves state-of-the-art predictive accuracy and superior uncertainty calibration, delivering a robust fail-safe mechanism for trustworthy clinical screening.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-17T13:27:11Z)
• FedAgain: A Trust-Based and Robust Federated Learning Strategy for an Automated Kidney Stone Identification in Ureteroscopy [6.025561073248826]
  This paper introduces FedAgain, a trust-based Federated Learning (Federated Learning) strategy designed to enhance robustness and generalization for automated kidney stone identification from endoscopic images.<n>The framework enables the training of collaborative models across multiple institutions while preserving data privacy and promoting stable convergence under real-world conditions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-19T22:40:37Z)
• A Robust Framework for Secure Cardiovascular Risk Prediction: An Architectural Case Study of Differentially Private Federated Learning [0.0]
  FedCVR Learning is a privacy-preserving framework applied to heterogeneous clinical networks.<n>We quantify the operational trade-offs of server-side adaptive optimization under utility-prioritized Differential Privacy.<n>Our findings confirm that server-side adaptivity is a structural prerequisite for recovering clinical utility under realistic privacy budgets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-28T09:36:38Z)
• Private and Robust Contribution Evaluation in Federated Learning [44.1965210509968]
  Cross-silo federated learning allows multiple organizations to collaboratively train machine learning models without sharing raw data.<n>Secure aggregation protects privacy by hiding individual updates, yet it complicates contribution evaluation.<n>We introduce two marginal-difference contribution scores compatible with secure aggregation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-25T09:27:40Z)
• Towards Reliable Medical LLMs: Benchmarking and Enhancing Confidence Estimation of Large Language Models in Medical Consultation [97.36081721024728]
  We propose the first benchmark for assessing confidence in multi-turn interaction during realistic medical consultations.<n>Our benchmark unifies three types of medical data for open-ended diagnostic generation.<n>We present MedConf, an evidence-grounded linguistic self-assessment framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-22T04:51:39Z)
• Causal and Federated Multimodal Learning for Cardiovascular Risk Prediction under Heterogeneous Populations [0.0]
  We create a single multimodal learning framework that integrates cross modal transformers with graph neural networks and causal representation learning to measure personalized CVD risk.<n>The model combines genomic variation, cardiac MRI, ECG waveforms, wearable streams, and structured EHR data to predict risk.<n>This study paves the way for a principled approach to clinically trustworthy, interpretable and privacy respecting CVD prediction at the population level.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-05T14:32:49Z)
• RADAR: A Risk-Aware Dynamic Multi-Agent Framework for LLM Safety Evaluation via Role-Specialized Collaboration [81.38705556267917]
  Existing safety evaluation methods for large language models (LLMs) suffer from inherent limitations.<n>We introduce a theoretical framework that reconstructs the underlying risk concept space.<n>We propose RADAR, a multi-agent collaborative evaluation framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-28T09:35:32Z)
• FedFiTS: Fitness-Selected, Slotted Client Scheduling for Trustworthy Federated Learning in Healthcare AI [33.17279604575767]
  Federated Learning (FL) has emerged as a powerful paradigm for privacy-preserving model training, yet deployments in sensitive domains such as healthcare face persistent challenges.<n>This paper introduces FedFiTS, a trust-aware selective FLTS that advances FedFaSt line by combining fitness-based client election with adaptive aggregation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-23T15:06:04Z)
• A Comparative Benchmark of Federated Learning Strategies for Mortality Prediction on Heterogeneous and Imbalanced Clinical Data [0.0]
  Federated Learning (FL) offers a privacy-preserving solution, but its performance under non-Independent and Identically Distributed (non-IID) and imbalanced conditions requires investigation.<n>This study presents a comparative benchmark of five federated learning strategies: FedAvg, FedProx, FedAdagrad, FedAdam, and FedCluster for mortality prediction.<n>Our findings indicate that regularization-based FL algorithms like FedProx offer a more robust and effective solution for heterogeneous and imbalanced clinical prediction tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-03T11:32:57Z)
• A Robust Pipeline for Differentially Private Federated Learning on Imbalanced Clinical Data using SMOTETomek and FedProx [0.0]
  Federated Learning (FL) presents a groundbreaking approach for collaborative health research.<n>FL offers formal security guarantees when combined with Differential Privacy (DP)<n>An optimal operational region was identified on the privacy-utility frontier.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-06T20:47:50Z)
• Collaborative Value Function Estimation Under Model Mismatch: A Federated Temporal Difference Analysis [55.13545823385091]
  Federated reinforcement learning (FedRL) enables collaborative learning while preserving data privacy by preventing direct data exchange between agents.<n>In real-world applications, each agent may experience slightly different transition dynamics, leading to inherent model mismatches.<n>We show that even moderate levels of information sharing significantly mitigate environment-specific errors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-21T18:06:28Z)
• Targeted Data Fusion for Causal Survival Analysis Under Distribution Shift [46.84912148188679]
  Causal inference across multiple data sources offers a promising avenue to enhance the generalizability and replicability of scientific findings.<n>Existing approaches fail to address the unique challenges of survival analysis, such as censoring and the integration of discrete and continuous time.<n>We propose two novel methods for estimating target site-specific causal effects in multi-source settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-30T23:21:25Z)
• Developing Federated Time-to-Event Scores Using Heterogeneous Real-World Survival Data [8.3734832069509]
  Existing methods for constructing survival scores presume that data originates from a single source. We propose a novel framework for building federated scoring systems for multi-site survival outcomes. In testing datasets from each participant site, our proposed federated scoring system consistently outperformed all local models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-08T11:32:00Z)
• Learning Federated Visual Prompt in Null Space for MRI Reconstruction [83.71117888610547]
  We propose a new algorithm, FedPR, to learn federated visual prompts in the null space of global prompt for MRI reconstruction. FedPR significantly outperforms state-of-the-art FL algorithms with 6% of communication costs when given the limited amount of local training data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-28T17:46:16Z)
• A standardized framework for risk-based assessment of treatment effect heterogeneity in observational healthcare databases [60.07352590494571]
  The aim of this study was to extend this approach to the observational setting using a standardized scalable framework. We demonstrate our framework by evaluating the effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors versus beta blockers on three efficacy and six safety outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-13T14:48:31Z)
• GenDICE: Generalized Offline Estimation of Stationary Values [108.17309783125398]
  We show that effective estimation can still be achieved in important applications. Our approach is based on estimating a ratio that corrects for the discrepancy between the stationary and empirical distributions. The resulting algorithm, GenDICE, is straightforward and effective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-21T00:27:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.