The Rise of Large Language Models and the Direction and Impact of US Federal Research Funding

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.15485v1
• Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2026 21:37:08 GMT
• Title: The Rise of Large Language Models and the Direction and Impact of US Federal Research Funding
• Authors: Yifan Qian, Zhe Wen, Alexander C. Furnas, Yue Bai, Erzhuo Shao, Dashun Wang,
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) are rapidly diffusing into scientific practice.<n>Despite growing attention to AI use in scientific writing and evaluation, little is known about how the rise of LLMs is reshaping the public funding landscape.<n>We find that LLM use rises sharply beginning in 2023 and exhibits a bimodal distribution, indicating a clear split between minimal and substantive use.
• Score: 43.39016984353673
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Federal research funding shapes the direction, diversity, and impact of the US scientific enterprise. Large language models (LLMs) are rapidly diffusing into scientific practice, holding substantial promise while raising widespread concerns. Despite growing attention to AI use in scientific writing and evaluation, little is known about how the rise of LLMs is reshaping the public funding landscape. Here, we examine LLM involvement at key stages of the federal funding pipeline by combining two complementary data sources: confidential National Science Foundation (NSF) and National Institutes of Health (NIH) proposal submissions from two large US R1 universities, including funded, unfunded, and pending proposals, and the full population of publicly released NSF and NIH awards. We find that LLM use rises sharply beginning in 2023 and exhibits a bimodal distribution, indicating a clear split between minimal and substantive use. Across both private submissions and public awards, higher LLM involvement is consistently associated with lower semantic distinctiveness, positioning projects closer to recently funded work within the same agency. The consequences of this shift are agency-dependent. LLM use is positively associated with proposal success and higher subsequent publication output at NIH, whereas no comparable associations are observed at NSF. Notably, the productivity gains at NIH are concentrated in non-hit papers rather than the most highly cited work. Together, these findings provide large-scale evidence that the rise of LLMs is reshaping how scientific ideas are positioned, selected, and translated into publicly funded research, with implications for portfolio governance, research diversity, and the long-run impact of science.

Related papers

• Depth and Autonomy: A Framework for Evaluating LLM Applications in Social Science Research [0.0]
  We introduce a framework that situates large language models (LLMs) usage along two dimensions, interpretive depth and autonomy.<n>We present the state of the literature with respect to these two dimensions, based on all published social science papers available on Web of Science.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-29T11:55:21Z)
• LLM-REVal: Can We Trust LLM Reviewers Yet? [70.58742663985652]
  Large language models (LLMs) have inspired researchers to integrate them extensively into the academic workflow.<n>This study focuses on how the deep integration of LLMs into both peer-review and research processes may influence scholarly fairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-14T10:30:20Z)
• ResearchBench: Benchmarking LLMs in Scientific Discovery via Inspiration-Based Task Decomposition [67.26124739345332]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated potential in assisting scientific research, yet their ability to discover high-quality research hypotheses remains unexamined.<n>We introduce the first large-scale benchmark for evaluating LLMs with a near-sufficient set of sub-tasks of scientific discovery.<n>We develop an automated framework that extracts critical components - research questions, background surveys, inspirations, and hypotheses - from scientific papers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-27T08:09:15Z)
• LLMs as Research Tools: A Large Scale Survey of Researchers' Usage and Perceptions [20.44227547555244]
  Large language models (LLMs) have led many researchers to consider their usage for scientific work. We present the first large-scale survey of 816 verified research article authors. We find that 81% of researchers have already incorporated LLMs into different aspects of their research workflow.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-30T04:25:23Z)
• Whose ChatGPT? Unveiling Real-World Educational Inequalities Introduced by Large Language Models [3.005864877840858]
  ChatGPT and other similar tools have prompted tremendous public excitement and experimental effort about the potential of large language models (LLMs) to improve learning experience and outcomes. However, little research has systematically examined the real-world impacts of LLM availability on educational equity. We analyze 1,140,328 academic writing submissions from 16,791 college students across 2,391 courses between 2021 and 2024 at a public, minority-serving institution in the US. We find that students' overall writing quality gradually increased following the availability of LLMs and that the writing quality gaps between linguistically advantaged and disadvantaged students became increasingly narrower
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-29T17:35:46Z)
• Transforming Scholarly Landscapes: Influence of Large Language Models on Academic Fields beyond Computer Science [77.31665252336157]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have ushered in a transformative era in Natural Language Processing (NLP) This work empirically examines the influence and use of LLMs in fields beyond NLP.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-29T01:32:35Z)
• Analyzing Diversity in Healthcare LLM Research: A Scientometric Perspective [3.724351094182122]
  This paper presents a comprehensive scientometric analysis of large language models (LLMs) research for healthcare. Our findings highlight significant gender and geographic disparities, with a predominance of male authors. We propose actionable strategies to enhance diversity and inclusivity in artificial intelligence research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-19T02:00:51Z)
• A Comprehensive Survey of Scientific Large Language Models and Their Applications in Scientific Discovery [68.48094108571432]
  Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the way text and other modalities of data are handled. We aim to provide a more holistic view of the research landscape by unveiling cross-field and cross-modal connections between scientific LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-16T08:03:24Z)
• Mapping the Increasing Use of LLMs in Scientific Papers [99.67983375899719]
  We conduct the first systematic, large-scale analysis across 950,965 papers published between January 2020 and February 2024 on the arXiv, bioRxiv, and Nature portfolio journals. Our findings reveal a steady increase in LLM usage, with the largest and fastest growth observed in Computer Science papers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-01T17:45:15Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.