Robust Federated Learning for Malicious Clients using Loss Trend Deviation Detection

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.20915v1
• Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2026 18:09:53 GMT
• Title: Robust Federated Learning for Malicious Clients using Loss Trend Deviation Detection
• Abstract summary: Federated Learning (FL) facilitates collaborative model training among distributed clients while ensuring that raw data remains on local devices.<n>Such clients can interfere with the training process by sending misleading updates, which can negatively affect the performance and reliability of the global model.<n>We propose the Federated Learning with Loss Trend Detection (FL-LTD), a lightweight and privacy-preserving defense framework that detects and mitigates malicious behavior by monitoring temporal loss dynamics rather than model gradients.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Federated Learning (FL) facilitates collaborative model training among distributed clients while ensuring that raw data remains on local devices.Despite this advantage, FL systems are still exposed to risks from malicious or unreliable participants. Such clients can interfere with the training process by sending misleading updates, which can negatively affect the performance and reliability of the global model. Many existing defense mechanisms rely on gradient inspection, complex similarity computations, or cryptographic operations, which introduce additional overhead and may become unstable under non-IID data distributions. In this paper, we propose the Federated Learning with Loss Trend Detection (FL-LTD), a lightweight and privacy-preserving defense framework that detects and mitigates malicious behavior by monitoring temporal loss dynamics rather than model gradients. The proposed approach identifies anomalous clients by detecting abnormal loss stagnation or abrupt loss fluctuations across communication rounds. To counter adaptive attackers, a short-term memory mechanism is incorporated to sustain mitigation for clients previously flagged as anomalous, while enabling trust recovery for stable participants. We evaluate FL-LTD on a non-IID federated MNIST setup under loss manipulation attacks. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method significantly enhances robustness, achieving a final test accuracy of 0.84, compared to 0.41 for standard FedAvg under attack. FL-LTD incurs negligible computational and communication overhead, maintains stable convergence, and avoids client exclusion or access to sensitive data, highlighting the effectiveness of loss-based monitoring for secure federated learning.

Related papers

• Conformal Changepoint Localization and Root Cause Analysis with Corrupted Observations [55.76952683833966]
  This paper proposes weighted CONCH (W-CONCH) and weighted CROC (W-CROC) to reduce confidence set size when data may be corrupted.<n>Experiments on image-based and real-world changepoint and root-cause benchmarks show that uncertainty-based weighting substantially reduces confidence set size.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-29T05:16:59Z)
• FERA: Uncertainty-Aware Federated Reasoning for Large Language Models [60.52562148874846]
  We study federated reasoning, where a server improves multi-step reasoning by coordinating with heterogeneous clients holding private demonstrations.<n>The key challenge is that client reliability is query-dependent, while the server cannot inspect client data to determine which contributions are trustworthy.<n>We propose Uncertainty-Aware Federated Reasoning (FERA), a training-free framework based on iterative server-client co-refinement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-11T07:04:51Z)
• Stragglers Can Contribute More: Uncertainty-Aware Distillation for Asynchronous Federated Learning [61.249748418757946]
  Asynchronous federated learning (FL) has recently gained attention for its enhanced efficiency and scalability.<n>We propose FedEcho, a novel framework that incorporates uncertainty-aware distillation to enhance the asynchronous FL performances.<n>We demonstrate that FedEcho consistently outperforms existing asynchronous federated learning baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-25T06:25:25Z)
• FLARE: Adaptive Multi-Dimensional Reputation for Robust Client Reliability in Federated Learning [0.6524460254566904]
  Federated learning (FL) enables collaborative model training while preserving data privacy.<n>It remains vulnerable to malicious clients who compromise model integrity through Byzantine attacks, data poisoning, or adaptive adversarial behaviors.<n>We propose FLARE, an adaptive reputation-based framework that transforms client reliability assessment from binary decisions to a continuous, multi-dimensional trust evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-18T17:57:40Z)
• Defending the Edge: Representative-Attention for Mitigating Backdoor Attacks in Federated Learning [7.808916974942399]
  heterogeneous edge devices produce diverse, non-independent, and identically distributed (non-IID) data.<n>We propose a novel representative-attention-based defense mechanism, named FeRA, to distinguish benign from malicious clients.<n>Our evaluation demonstrates FeRA's robustness across various FL scenarios, including challenging non-IID data distributions typical of edge devices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-15T13:44:32Z)
• TrustLoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation for Failure Detection under Out-of-distribution Data [62.22804234013273]
  We propose a simple failure detection framework to unify and facilitate classification with rejection under both covariate and semantic shifts.<n>Our key insight is that by separating and consolidating failure-specific reliability knowledge with low-rank adapters, we can enhance the failure detection ability effectively and flexibly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-20T09:20:55Z)
• Byzantine-Robust Federated Learning Using Generative Adversarial Networks [1.4091801425319963]
  Federated learning (FL) enables collaborative model training across distributed clients without sharing raw data, but its robustness is threatened by Byzantine behaviors such as data and model poisoning.<n>We present a defense framework that addresses these challenges by leveraging a conditional generative adversarial network (cGAN) at the server to synthesize representative data for validating client updates.<n>This approach eliminates reliance on external datasets, adapts to diverse attack strategies, and integrates seamlessly into standard FL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-26T18:00:56Z)
• SMTFL: Secure Model Training to Untrusted Participants in Federated Learning [8.225656436115509]
  Federated learning is an essential distributed model training technique.<n> gradient inversion attacks and poisoning attacks pose significant risks to the privacy of training data and the model correctness.<n>We propose a novel approach called SMTFL to achieve secure model training in federated learning without relying on trusted participants.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-04T06:12:43Z)
• Towards Resource-Efficient Federated Learning in Industrial IoT for Multivariate Time Series Analysis [50.18156030818883]
  Anomaly and missing data constitute a thorny problem in industrial applications. Deep learning enabled anomaly detection has emerged as a critical direction. The data collected in edge devices contain user privacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-06T15:38:31Z)
• Formal Logic-guided Robust Federated Learning against Poisoning Attacks [6.997975378492098]
  Federated Learning (FL) offers a promising solution to the privacy concerns associated with centralized Machine Learning (ML) FL is vulnerable to various security threats, including poisoning attacks, where adversarial clients manipulate the training data or model updates to degrade overall model performance. We present a defense mechanism designed to mitigate poisoning attacks in federated learning for time-series tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-05T16:23:19Z)
• Client-side Gradient Inversion Against Federated Learning from Poisoning [59.74484221875662]
  Federated Learning (FL) enables distributed participants to train a global model without sharing data directly to a central server. Recent studies have revealed that FL is vulnerable to gradient inversion attack (GIA), which aims to reconstruct the original training samples. We propose Client-side poisoning Gradient Inversion (CGI), which is a novel attack method that can be launched from clients.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-14T03:48:27Z)
• G$^2$uardFL: Safeguarding Federated Learning Against Backdoor Attacks through Attributed Client Graph Clustering [116.4277292854053]
  Federated Learning (FL) offers collaborative model training without data sharing. FL is vulnerable to backdoor attacks, where poisoned model weights lead to compromised system integrity. We present G$2$uardFL, a protective framework that reinterprets the identification of malicious clients as an attributed graph clustering problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-08T07:15:04Z)
• FLIP: A Provable Defense Framework for Backdoor Mitigation in Federated Learning [66.56240101249803]
  We study how hardening benign clients can affect the global model (and the malicious clients) We propose a trigger reverse engineering based defense and show that our method can achieve improvement with guarantee robustness. Our results on eight competing SOTA defense methods show the empirical superiority of our method on both single-shot and continuous FL backdoor attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-23T22:24:03Z)
• Federated Learning with Unreliable Clients: Performance Analysis and Mechanism Design [76.29738151117583]
  Federated Learning (FL) has become a promising tool for training effective machine learning models among distributed clients. However, low quality models could be uploaded to the aggregator server by unreliable clients, leading to a degradation or even a collapse of training. We model these unreliable behaviors of clients and propose a defensive mechanism to mitigate such a security risk.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-10T08:02:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.