Investigating the Interplay of Parameterization and Optimizer in Gradient-Free Topology Optimization: A Cantilever Beam Case Study
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.22241v2
- Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2026 11:12:21 GMT
- Title: Investigating the Interplay of Parameterization and Optimizer in Gradient-Free Topology Optimization: A Cantilever Beam Case Study
- Authors: Jelle Westra, Iván Olarte Rodríguez, Niki van Stein, Thomas Bäck, Elena Raponi,
- Abstract summary: This study investigates the interplay through a minimization problem for a cantilever beam subject to a connectivity constraint.<n>We benchmark three geometric parameterizations, each combined with three representative BBO algorithms.<n>Results reveal that parameterization quality has a stronger influence on optimization performance than choice.
- Score: 1.7414095108022616
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Gradient-free black-box optimization (BBO) is widely used in engineering design and provides a flexible framework for topology optimization (TO), enabling the discovery of high-performing structural designs without requiring gradient information from simulations. Yet, its success depends on two key choices: the geometric parameterization defining the search space and the optimizer exploring it. This study investigates this interplay through a compliance minimization problem for a cantilever beam subject to a connectivity constraint. We benchmark three geometric parameterizations, each combined with three representative BBO algorithms: differential evolution, covariance matrix adaptation evolution strategy, and heteroscedastic evolutionary Bayesian optimization, across 10D, 20D, and 50D design spaces. Results reveal that parameterization quality has a stronger influence on optimization performance than optimizer choice: a well-structured parameterization enables robust and competitive performance across algorithms, whereas weaker representations increase optimizer dependency. Overall, this study highlights the dominant role of geometric parameterization in practical BBO-based TO and shows that algorithm performance and selection cannot be fairly assessed without accounting for the induced design space.
Related papers
- Optimization is Not Enough: Why Problem Formulation Deserves Equal Attention [1.6516446394328081]
Black-box optimization is increasingly used in engineering design problems where simulation-based evaluations are costly and gradients are unavailable.<n>We show that context-agnostic strategies consistently lead to suboptimal or non-physical designs.<n>We motivate the development of new black-box benchmarks that reward physically informed and context-aware optimization strategies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-05T09:15:19Z) - From Coefficients to Directions: Rethinking Model Merging with Directional Alignment [66.99062575537555]
We introduce a unified geometric framework, emphMerging with Directional Alignment (method), which aligns directional structures consistently in both the parameter and feature spaces.<n>Our analysis shows that directional alignment improves structural coherence, and extensive experiments across benchmarks, model scales, and task configurations further validate the effectiveness of our approach.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-29T08:40:58Z) - Efficient Design of Compliant Mechanisms Using Multi-Objective Optimization [50.24983453990065]
We address the synthesis of a compliant cross-hinge mechanism capable of large angular strokes.<n>We formulate a multi-objective optimization problem based on kinetostatic performance measures.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-23T06:29:10Z) - Accelerated Gradient-based Design Optimization Via Differentiable Physics-Informed Neural Operator: A Composites Autoclave Processing Case Study [0.0]
We introduce a novel Physics-Informed DeepONet (PIDON) architecture to effectively model the nonlinear behavior of complex engineering systems.<n>We demonstrate the effectiveness of this framework in the optimization of aerospace-grade composites curing processes achieving a 3x speedup.<n>The proposed model has the potential to be used as a scalable and efficient optimization tool for broader applications in advanced engineering and digital twin systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-17T07:11:46Z) - Reinforcement learning Based Automated Design of Differential Evolution Algorithm for Black-box Optimization [14.116216795259554]
Differential evolution (DE) algorithm is recognized as one of the most effective evolutionary algorithms.<n>We introduce a novel framework that employs reinforcement learning (RL) to automatically design DE for black-box optimization.<n>RL acts as an advanced meta-optimizer, generating a customized DE configuration.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-22T13:41:47Z) - End-to-End Learning for Fair Multiobjective Optimization Under
Uncertainty [55.04219793298687]
The Predict-Then-Forecast (PtO) paradigm in machine learning aims to maximize downstream decision quality.
This paper extends the PtO methodology to optimization problems with nondifferentiable Ordered Weighted Averaging (OWA) objectives.
It shows how optimization of OWA functions can be effectively integrated with parametric prediction for fair and robust optimization under uncertainty.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-12T16:33:35Z) - Scalable Bayesian optimization with high-dimensional outputs using
randomized prior networks [3.0468934705223774]
We propose a deep learning framework for BO and sequential decision making based on bootstrapped ensembles of neural architectures with randomized priors.
We show that the proposed framework can approximate functional relationships between design variables and quantities of interest, even in cases where the latter take values in high-dimensional vector spaces or even infinite-dimensional function spaces.
We test the proposed framework against state-of-the-art methods for BO and demonstrate superior performance across several challenging tasks with high-dimensional outputs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-14T18:55:21Z) - Optimization-Inspired Learning with Architecture Augmentations and
Control Mechanisms for Low-Level Vision [74.9260745577362]
This paper proposes a unified optimization-inspired learning framework to aggregate Generative, Discriminative, and Corrective (GDC) principles.
We construct three propagative modules to effectively solve the optimization models with flexible combinations.
Experiments across varied low-level vision tasks validate the efficacy and adaptability of GDC.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-10T03:24:53Z) - Bilevel Optimization: Convergence Analysis and Enhanced Design [63.64636047748605]
Bilevel optimization is a tool for many machine learning problems.
We propose a novel stoc-efficientgradient estimator named stoc-BiO.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-15T18:09:48Z) - EOS: a Parallel, Self-Adaptive, Multi-Population Evolutionary Algorithm
for Constrained Global Optimization [68.8204255655161]
EOS is a global optimization algorithm for constrained and unconstrained problems of real-valued variables.
It implements a number of improvements to the well-known Differential Evolution (DE) algorithm.
Results prove that EOSis capable of achieving increased performance compared to state-of-the-art single-population self-adaptive DE algorithms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-09T10:19:22Z) - Additive Tree-Structured Covariance Function for Conditional Parameter
Spaces in Bayesian Optimization [34.89735938765757]
We generalize the additive assumption to tree-structured functions.
By incorporating the structure information of parameter spaces and the additive assumption in the BO loop, we develop a parallel algorithm to optimize the acquisition function.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-21T11:21:55Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.