Equivalence of Privacy and Stability with Generalization Guarantees in Quantum Learning
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.01177v2
- Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2026 10:06:53 GMT
- Title: Equivalence of Privacy and Stability with Generalization Guarantees in Quantum Learning
- Authors: Ayanava Dasgupta, Naqueeb Ahmad Warsi, Masahito Hayashi,
- Abstract summary: We present a unified information-theoretic framework elucidating the interplay between stability, privacy, and the generalization performance of quantum learning algorithms.<n>We establish a bound on the expected generalization error in terms of quantum mutual information and derive a probabilistic upper bound that generalizes the classical result by Esposito et al.<n>We extend our analysis to dishonest learning algorithms, introducing Information-Theoretic Admissibility (ITA) to characterize the fundamental limits of privacy when the learning algorithm is oblivious to specific dataset instances.
- Score: 42.694152897125726
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: We present a unified information-theoretic framework elucidating the interplay between stability, privacy, and the generalization performance of quantum learning algorithms. We establish a bound on the expected generalization error in terms of quantum mutual information and derive a probabilistic upper bound that generalizes the classical result by Esposito et al. (2021). Complementing these findings, we provide a lower bound on the expected true loss relative to the expected empirical loss. Additionally, we demonstrate that $(\varepsilon, δ)$-quantum differentially private learning algorithms are stable, thereby ensuring strong generalization guarantees. Finally, we extend our analysis to dishonest learning algorithms, introducing Information-Theoretic Admissibility (ITA) to characterize the fundamental limits of privacy when the learning algorithm is oblivious to specific dataset instances.
Related papers
- Characterizing Online and Private Learnability under Distributional Constraints via Generalized Smoothness [63.833913892018536]
We study sequential decision making under distributional adversaries that can adaptively choose data-generating distributions from a fixed family $U$.<n>We provide a near complete characterization of families $U$ that admit learnability in terms of a notion known as generalized smoothness.<n>We show that the generalized smoothness also characterizes private learnability under distributional constraints.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-24T06:15:59Z) - Covert Quantum Learning: Privately and Verifiably Learning from Quantum Data [4.230025065044209]
We propose models of covert verifiable learning in quantum learning theory.<n>We show that the exponential separation between classical and quantum queries for Forrelation and Simon's problem survives under covertness constraints.<n>Our models and corresponding algorithms demonstrate that quantum advantages are privately and verifiably achievable even with untrusted, remote data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-08T16:25:28Z) - Global Convergence of Continual Learning on Non-IID Data [51.99584235667152]
We provide a general and comprehensive theoretical analysis for continual learning of regression models.<n>We establish the almost sure convergence results of continual learning under a general data condition for the first time.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-24T10:06:07Z) - A Unified Learn-to-Distort-Data Framework for Privacy-Utility Trade-off in Trustworthy Federated Learning [5.622065847054885]
We present the textitLearn-to-Distort-Data framework, which provides a principled approach to navigate the privacy-utility equilibrium.
We demonstrate the applicability of our framework to a variety of privacy-preserving mechanisms on the basis of data distortion.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-05T08:15:09Z) - Bounds and guarantees for learning and entanglement [0.0]
Information theory provides tools to predict the performance of a learning algorithm on a given dataset.
This work first extends this relationship by demonstrating that a small conditional entropy is also sufficient for successful learning.
This connection between information theory and learning suggests that we might similarly apply quantum information theory to characterize learning tasks involving quantum systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-10T18:09:22Z) - Federated Transfer Learning with Differential Privacy [21.50525027559563]
Federated learning has emerged as a powerful framework for analysing distributed data.<n>In this paper, we aim to enhance learning on a target data set by leveraging information from multiple heterogeneous source data sets.<n>We rigorously formulate the notion of federated differential privacy, which offers privacy guarantees for each data set.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-17T21:04:48Z) - A unified framework for information-theoretic generalization bounds [8.04975023021212]
This paper presents a general methodology for deriving information-theoretic generalization bounds for learning algorithms.
The main technical tool is a probabilistic decorrelation lemma based on a change of measure and a relaxation of Young's inequality in $L_psi_p$ Orlicz spaces.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-18T15:36:20Z) - On the Query Complexity of Training Data Reconstruction in Private
Learning [0.0]
We analyze the number of queries that a whitebox adversary needs to make to a private learner in order to reconstruct its training data.
For $(epsilon, delta)$ DP learners with training data drawn from any arbitrary compact metric space, we provide the emphfirst known lower bounds on the adversary's query complexity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-29T00:49:38Z) - Breaking the Communication-Privacy-Accuracy Tradeoff with
$f$-Differential Privacy [51.11280118806893]
We consider a federated data analytics problem in which a server coordinates the collaborative data analysis of multiple users with privacy concerns and limited communication capability.
We study the local differential privacy guarantees of discrete-valued mechanisms with finite output space through the lens of $f$-differential privacy (DP)
More specifically, we advance the existing literature by deriving tight $f$-DP guarantees for a variety of discrete-valued mechanisms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-19T16:58:53Z) - Information Theoretic Lower Bounds for Information Theoretic Upper
Bounds [14.268363583731848]
We examine the relationship between the output model and the empirical generalization and the algorithm in the context of convex optimization.
Our study reveals that, for true risk minimization, mutual information is necessary.
Existing information-theoretic generalization bounds fall short in capturing the capabilities of algorithms like SGD and regularized, which have-independent dimension sample complexity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-09T20:42:36Z) - On the Privacy-Robustness-Utility Trilemma in Distributed Learning [7.778461949427662]
We present the first tight analysis of the error incurred by any algorithm ensuring robustness against a fraction of adversarial machines.
Our analysis exhibits a fundamental trade-off between privacy, robustness, and utility.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-09T17:24:18Z) - Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent with Low-Noise [49.981789906200035]
Modern machine learning algorithms aim to extract fine-grained information from data to provide accurate predictions, which often conflicts with the goal of privacy protection.
This paper addresses the practical and theoretical importance of developing privacy-preserving machine learning algorithms that ensure good performance while preserving privacy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-09T08:54:13Z) - On Leave-One-Out Conditional Mutual Information For Generalization [122.2734338600665]
We derive information theoretic generalization bounds for supervised learning algorithms based on a new measure of leave-one-out conditional mutual information (loo-CMI)
Contrary to other CMI bounds, our loo-CMI bounds can be computed easily and can be interpreted in connection to other notions such as classical leave-one-out cross-validation.
We empirically validate the quality of the bound by evaluating its predicted generalization gap in scenarios for deep learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-01T17:58:29Z) - Decentralized Stochastic Optimization with Inherent Privacy Protection [103.62463469366557]
Decentralized optimization is the basic building block of modern collaborative machine learning, distributed estimation and control, and large-scale sensing.
Since involved data, privacy protection has become an increasingly pressing need in the implementation of decentralized optimization algorithms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-08T14:38:23Z) - Tighter Generalization Bounds for Iterative Differentially Private
Learning Algorithms [95.73230376153872]
This paper studies the relationship between generalization and privacy preservation in iterative learning algorithms by two sequential steps.
We prove that $(varepsilon, delta)$-differential privacy implies an on-average generalization bound for multi-Database learning algorithms.
We then investigate how the iterative nature shared by most learning algorithms influence privacy preservation and further generalization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-18T09:12:03Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.