Covert Quantum Learning: Privately and Verifiably Learning from Quantum Data
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.07193v1
- Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2025 16:25:28 GMT
- Title: Covert Quantum Learning: Privately and Verifiably Learning from Quantum Data
- Authors: Abhishek Anand, Matthias C. Caro, Ari Karchmer, Saachi Mutreja,
- Abstract summary: We propose models of covert verifiable learning in quantum learning theory.<n>We show that the exponential separation between classical and quantum queries for Forrelation and Simon's problem survives under covertness constraints.<n>Our models and corresponding algorithms demonstrate that quantum advantages are privately and verifiably achievable even with untrusted, remote data.
- Score: 4.230025065044209
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Quantum learning from remotely accessed quantum compute and data must address two key challenges: verifying the correctness of data and ensuring the privacy of the learner's data-collection strategies and resulting conclusions. The covert (verifiable) learning model of Canetti and Karchmer (TCC 2021) provides a framework for endowing classical learning algorithms with such guarantees. In this work, we propose models of covert verifiable learning in quantum learning theory and realize them without computational hardness assumptions for remote data access scenarios motivated by established quantum data advantages. We consider two privacy notions: (i) strategy-covertness, where the eavesdropper does not gain information about the learner's strategy; and (ii) target-covertness, where the eavesdropper does not gain information about the unknown object being learned. We show: Strategy-covert algorithms for making quantum statistical queries via classical shadows; Target-covert algorithms for learning quadratic functions from public quantum examples and private quantum statistical queries, for Pauli shadow tomography and stabilizer state learning from public multi-copy and private single-copy quantum measurements, and for solving Forrelation and Simon's problem from public quantum queries and private classical queries, where the adversary is a unidirectional or i.i.d. ancilla-free eavesdropper. The lattermost results in particular establish that the exponential separation between classical and quantum queries for Forrelation and Simon's problem survives under covertness constraints. Along the way, we design covert verifiable protocols for quantum data acquisition from public quantum queries which may be of independent interest. Overall, our models and corresponding algorithms demonstrate that quantum advantages are privately and verifiably achievable even with untrusted, remote data.
Related papers
- Practical quantum federated learning and its experimental demonstration [16.652124459831946]
We propose a practical quantum federated learning framework on quantum networks.<n>We experimentally validate our framework on a 4-client quantum network with a scalable structure.<n>Our work provides critical insights for building scalable, efficient, and quantum-secure machine learning systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-22T08:28:11Z) - Quantum delegated and federated learning via quantum homomorphic encryption [0.5939164722752263]
We present a general framework that enables quantum delegated and federated learning with atheoretical data privacy guarantee.
We show that learning and inference under this framework feature substantially lower communication complexity compared with schemes based on blind quantum computing.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-28T14:13:50Z) - Efficient Learning for Linear Properties of Bounded-Gate Quantum Circuits [62.46800898243033]
Recent progress in quantum learning theory prompts a question: can linear properties of a large-qubit circuit be efficiently learned from measurement data generated by varying classical inputs?<n>We prove that the sample complexity scaling linearly in $d$ is required to achieve a small prediction error, while the corresponding computational complexity may scale exponentially in d.<n>We propose a kernel-based method leveraging classical shadows and truncated trigonometric expansions, enabling a controllable trade-off between prediction accuracy and computational overhead.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-22T08:21:28Z) - The curse of random quantum data [62.24825255497622]
We quantify the performances of quantum machine learning in the landscape of quantum data.
We find that the training efficiency and generalization capabilities in quantum machine learning will be exponentially suppressed with the increase in qubits.
Our findings apply to both the quantum kernel method and the large-width limit of quantum neural networks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-19T12:18:07Z) - Separable Power of Classical and Quantum Learning Protocols Through the Lens of No-Free-Lunch Theorem [70.42372213666553]
The No-Free-Lunch (NFL) theorem quantifies problem- and data-independent generalization errors regardless of the optimization process.
We categorize a diverse array of quantum learning algorithms into three learning protocols designed for learning quantum dynamics under a specified observable.
Our derived NFL theorems demonstrate quadratic reductions in sample complexity across CLC-LPs, ReQu-LPs, and Qu-LPs.
We attribute this performance discrepancy to the unique capacity of quantum-related learning protocols to indirectly utilize information concerning the global phases of non-orthogonal quantum states.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-12T09:05:13Z) - Blind quantum machine learning with quantum bipartite correlator [13.533591812956018]
We introduce novel blind quantum machine learning protocols based on the quantum bipartite correlator algorithm.
Our protocols have reduced communication overhead while preserving the privacy of data from untrusted parties.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-19T16:42:32Z) - Statistical Complexity of Quantum Learning [32.48879688084909]
This article reviews the complexity of quantum learning using information-theoretic techniques.
We focus on data complexity, copy complexity, and model complexity.
We highlight the differences between quantum and classical learning by addressing both supervised and unsupervised learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-20T20:04:05Z) - ShadowNet for Data-Centric Quantum System Learning [188.683909185536]
We propose a data-centric learning paradigm combining the strength of neural-network protocols and classical shadows.
Capitalizing on the generalization power of neural networks, this paradigm can be trained offline and excel at predicting previously unseen systems.
We present the instantiation of our paradigm in quantum state tomography and direct fidelity estimation tasks and conduct numerical analysis up to 60 qubits.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-22T09:11:53Z) - Classical Verification of Quantum Learning [42.362388367152256]
We develop a framework for classical verification of quantum learning.
We propose a new quantum data access model that we call "mixture-of-superpositions" quantum examples.
Our results demonstrate that the potential power of quantum data for learning tasks, while not unlimited, can be utilized by classical agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-08T00:31:27Z) - A didactic approach to quantum machine learning with a single qubit [68.8204255655161]
We focus on the case of learning with a single qubit, using data re-uploading techniques.
We implement the different proposed formulations in toy and real-world datasets using the qiskit quantum computing SDK.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-23T18:25:32Z) - Quantum noise protects quantum classifiers against adversaries [120.08771960032033]
Noise in quantum information processing is often viewed as a disruptive and difficult-to-avoid feature, especially in near-term quantum technologies.
We show that by taking advantage of depolarisation noise in quantum circuits for classification, a robustness bound against adversaries can be derived.
This is the first quantum protocol that can be used against the most general adversaries.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-20T17:56:14Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.