SafeGround: Know When to Trust GUI Grounding Models via Uncertainty Calibration

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.02419v2
• Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2026 08:31:29 GMT
• Title: SafeGround: Know When to Trust GUI Grounding Models via Uncertainty Calibration
• Abstract summary: We introduce SafeGround, an uncertainty-aware framework for GUI grounding models.<n>It enables risk-aware predictions through calibrations before testing.<n>We apply SafeGround on multiple GUI grounding models for the challenging ScreenSpot-Pro benchmark.
• Score: 38.97678256807034
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Graphical User Interface (GUI) grounding aims to translate natural language instructions into executable screen coordinates, enabling automated GUI interaction. Nevertheless, incorrect grounding can result in costly, hard-to-reverse actions (e.g., erroneous payment approvals), raising concerns about model reliability. In this paper, we introduce SafeGround, an uncertainty-aware framework for GUI grounding models that enables risk-aware predictions through calibrations before testing. SafeGround leverages a distribution-aware uncertainty quantification method to capture the spatial dispersion of stochastic samples from outputs of any given model. Then, through the calibration process, SafeGround derives a test-time decision threshold with statistically guaranteed false discovery rate (FDR) control. We apply SafeGround on multiple GUI grounding models for the challenging ScreenSpot-Pro benchmark. Experimental results show that our uncertainty measure consistently outperforms existing baselines in distinguishing correct from incorrect predictions, while the calibrated threshold reliably enables rigorous risk control and potentials of substantial system-level accuracy improvements. Across multiple GUI grounding models, SafeGround improves system-level accuracy by up to 5.38% percentage points over Gemini-only inference.

Related papers

• CIAware-Bench: Benchmarking Control Intervention Awareness Across Frontier LLMs [100.38986535324284]
  We introduce textbfCIAware-Bench, a benchmark for measuring textbfcontrol textbfintervention (CI) awareness across frontier models.<n>CIAware-Bench tests whether models can distinguish their own trajectories from those modified by a control intervention.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-09T16:24:16Z)
• Discovery of Hidden Miscalibration Regimes [52.452902154360565]
  Models may be systematically overconfident on some kinds of inputs and underconfident on others.<n>We define the corresponding miscalibration field and propose a diagnostic framework for estimating it.<n>Our approach learns a calibration-aware representation of the input space and estimates signed local miscalibration by kernel smoothing in the learned geometry.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-13T13:07:50Z)
• BAMI: Training-Free Bias Mitigation in GUI Grounding [72.1023567399117]
  We introduce textbfBias-Aware Manipulation Inference (BAMI), which incorporates two key manipulations, coarse-to-fine focus and candidate selection, to effectively mitigate these biases.<n>BAMI significantly enhances the accuracy of various GUI grounding models in a training-free setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-07T17:59:31Z)
• UI-Zoomer: Uncertainty-Driven Adaptive Zoom-In for GUI Grounding [55.22866422166757]
  Test-time zoom-in methods apply cropping uniformly across all instances with fixed crop sizes, ignoring whether the model is actually uncertain on each case.<n>We propose textbfUI-Zoomer, a training-free adaptive zoom-in framework that treats both the trigger and scale of zoom-in as a prediction uncertainty problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-15T17:32:28Z)
• HyperClick: Advancing Reliable GUI Grounding via Uncertainty Calibration [18.315584342136997]
  HyperClick is a novel framework that enhances reliable GUI grounding through uncertainty calibration.<n>We show that HyperClick achieves state-of-the-art performance while providing well-calibrated confidence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-31T08:07:02Z)
• Uncertainty-Driven Reliability: Selective Prediction and Trustworthy Deployment in Modern Machine Learning [1.2183405753834562]
  This thesis investigates how uncertainty estimation can enhance the safety and trustworthiness of machine learning (ML) systems.<n>We first show that a model's training trajectory contains rich uncertainty signals that can be exploited without altering its architecture or loss.<n>We propose a lightweight, post-hoc abstention method that works across tasks, avoids the cost of deep ensembles, and achieves state-of-the-art selective prediction performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-11T02:33:53Z)
• An Uncertainty-aware DETR Enhancement Framework for Object Detection [10.102900613370817]
  We propose an uncertainty-aware enhancement framework for DETR-based object detectors.<n>We derive a Bayes Risk formulation to filter high-risk information and improve detection reliability.<n> Experiments on the COCO benchmark show that our method can be effectively integrated into existing DETR variants.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-20T07:53:04Z)
• Automatically Adaptive Conformal Risk Control [49.95190019041905]
  We propose a methodology for achieving approximate conditional control of statistical risks by adapting to the difficulty of test samples.<n>Our framework goes beyond traditional conditional risk control based on user-provided conditioning events to the algorithmic, data-driven determination of appropriate function classes for conditioning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-25T08:29:32Z)
• Selective Learning: Towards Robust Calibration with Dynamic Regularization [79.92633587914659]
  Miscalibration in deep learning refers to there is a discrepancy between the predicted confidence and performance. We introduce Dynamic Regularization (DReg) which aims to learn what should be learned during training thereby circumventing the confidence adjusting trade-off.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-13T11:25:20Z)
• Two Sides of Miscalibration: Identifying Over and Under-Confidence Prediction for Network Calibration [1.192436948211501]
  Proper confidence calibration of deep neural networks is essential for reliable predictions in safety-critical tasks. Miscalibration can lead to model over-confidence and/or under-confidence. We introduce a novel metric, a miscalibration score, to identify the overall and class-wise calibration status. We use the class-wise miscalibration score as a proxy to design a calibration technique that can tackle both over and under-confidence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-06T17:59:14Z)
• Uncertainty-Aware AB3DMOT by Variational 3D Object Detection [74.8441634948334]
  Uncertainty estimation is an effective tool to provide statistically accurate predictions. In this paper, we propose a Variational Neural Network-based TANet 3D object detector to generate 3D object detections with uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-12T14:30:03Z)
• GLENet: Boosting 3D Object Detectors with Generative Label Uncertainty Estimation [70.75100533512021]
  In this paper, we formulate the label uncertainty problem as the diversity of potentially plausible bounding boxes of objects. We propose GLENet, a generative framework adapted from conditional variational autoencoders, to model the one-to-many relationship between a typical 3D object and its potential ground-truth bounding boxes with latent variables. The label uncertainty generated by GLENet is a plug-and-play module and can be conveniently integrated into existing deep 3D detectors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-06T06:26:17Z)
• Probabilistic robust linear quadratic regulators with Gaussian processes [73.0364959221845]
  Probabilistic models such as Gaussian processes (GPs) are powerful tools to learn unknown dynamical systems from data for subsequent use in control design. We present a novel controller synthesis for linearized GP dynamics that yields robust controllers with respect to a probabilistic stability margin.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-17T08:36:18Z)
• Uncertainty-sensitive Activity Recognition: a Reliability Benchmark and the CARING Models [37.60817779613977]
  We present the first study of how welthe confidence values of modern action recognition architectures indeed reflect the probability of the correct outcome. We introduce a new approach which learns to transform the model output into realistic confidence estimates through an additional calibration network.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-02T15:41:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.