An Approximate Ascent Approach To Prove Convergence of PPO

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.03386v1
• Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2026 11:10:22 GMT
• Title: An Approximate Ascent Approach To Prove Convergence of PPO
• Authors: Leif Doering, Daniel Schmidt, Moritz Melcher, Sebastian Kassing, Benedikt Wille, Tilman Aach, Simon Weissmann,
• Abstract summary: We show how PPO's policy update scheme can be interpreted as approximated policy gradient ascent.<n>We also identify a previously overlooked issue in truncated Generalized Advantage Estimation.<n> Empirical evaluations show that a simple weight correction can yield substantial improvements in environments with strong terminal signal.
• Score: 2.2141165657353468
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) is among the most widely used deep reinforcement learning algorithms, yet its theoretical foundations remain incomplete. Most importantly, convergence and understanding of fundamental PPO advantages remain widely open. Under standard theory assumptions we show how PPO's policy update scheme (performing multiple epochs of minibatch updates on multi-use rollouts with a surrogate gradient) can be interpreted as approximated policy gradient ascent. We show how to control the bias accumulated by the surrogate gradients and use techniques from random reshuffling to prove a convergence theorem for PPO that sheds light on PPO's success. Additionally, we identify a previously overlooked issue in truncated Generalized Advantage Estimation commonly used in PPO. The geometric weighting scheme induces infinite mass collapse onto the longest $k$-step advantage estimator at episode boundaries. Empirical evaluations show that a simple weight correction can yield substantial improvements in environments with strong terminal signal, such as Lunar Lander.

Related papers

• Rethinking the Trust Region in LLM Reinforcement Learning [72.25890308541334]
  Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) serves as the de facto standard algorithm for Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We propose Divergence Proximal Policy Optimization (DPPO), which substitutes clipping with a more principled constraint.<n>DPPO achieves superior training and efficiency compared to existing methods, offering a more robust foundation for RL-based fine-tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-04T18:59:04Z)
• Coverage Improvement and Fast Convergence of On-policy Preference Learning [67.36750525893514]
  Online on-policy preference learning algorithms for language model alignment can significantly outperform their offline counterparts.<n>We analyze how the sampling policy's coverage evolves throughout on-policy training.<n>We develop principled on-policy schemes for reward distillation in the general function class setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-13T10:46:06Z)
• On the Theory and Practice of GRPO: A Trajectory-Corrected Approach with Fast Convergence [2.8165669455824696]
  Group Relative Policy Optimization is a critic-free reinforcement learning algorithm.<n>We show that GRPO update rule estimates the policy gradient at the old policy rather than the current one.<n>We propose a new algorithm: Trajectory level Importance Corrected GRPO.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-04T19:01:19Z)
• PPO in the Fisher-Rao geometry [0.0]
  Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) has become a widely adopted algorithm for reinforcement learning.<n>Despite its popularity, PPO lacks formal theoretical guarantees for policy improvement and convergence.<n>In this paper, we derive a tighter surrogate in the Fisher-Rao geometry, yielding a novel variant, Fisher-Rao PPO (FR-PPO)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-04T09:23:27Z)
• A dynamical clipping approach with task feedback for Proximal Policy Optimization [29.855219523565786]
  There is no theoretical proof that the optimal PPO clipping bound remains consistent throughout the entire training process. Past studies have aimed to dynamically adjust PPO clipping bound to enhance PPO's performance. We propose Preference based Proximal Policy Optimization (Pb-PPO) to better reflect the preference (maximizing Return) of reinforcement learning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-12T06:35:56Z)
• Submodular Reinforcement Learning [38.40138241424851]
  In reinforcement learning (RL), rewards of states are typically considered additive, and following the Markov assumption, they are $textitindependent$ states visited previously. In many important applications, such as coverage control, experiment design and informative path planning, rewards naturally have diminishing returns, i.e., their value decreases in light of similar states visited previously. We propose $textitsubmodular RL$ (SubRL), a paradigm which seeks to optimize more general, non-additive (and history-dependent) rewards modelled via submodular set functions which capture diminishing returns
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-25T09:46:02Z)
• Fine-Tuning Language Models with Advantage-Induced Policy Alignment [80.96507425217472]
  We propose a novel algorithm for aligning large language models to human preferences. We show that it consistently outperforms PPO in language tasks by a large margin. We also provide a theoretical justification supporting the design of our loss function.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-04T01:59:40Z)
• The Role of Baselines in Policy Gradient Optimization [83.42050606055822]
  We show that the emphstate value baseline allows on-policy. emphnatural policy gradient (NPG) to converge to a globally optimal. policy at an $O (1/t) rate gradient. We find that the primary effect of the value baseline is to textbfreduce the aggressiveness of the updates rather than their variance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-16T06:28:00Z)
• You May Not Need Ratio Clipping in PPO [117.03368180633463]
  Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) methods learn a policy by iteratively performing multiple mini-batch optimization epochs of a surrogate objective with one set of sampled data. Ratio clipping PPO is a popular variant that clips the probability ratios between the target policy and the policy used to collect samples. We show in this paper that such ratio clipping may not be a good option as it can fail to effectively bound the ratios. We show that ESPO can be easily scaled up to distributed training with many workers, delivering strong performance as well.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-31T20:26:56Z)
• On Proximal Policy Optimization's Heavy-tailed Gradients [150.08522793940708]
  We study the heavy-tailed nature of the gradients of the Proximal Policy Optimization surrogate reward function. In this paper, we study the effects of the standard PPO clippings, demonstrating that these tricks primarily serve to offset heavy-tailedness in gradients. We propose incorporating GMOM, a high-dimensional robust estimator, into PPO as a substitute for three clipping tricks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-20T05:51:28Z)
• Proximal Policy Optimization with Relative Pearson Divergence [8.071506311915396]
  PPO clips density ratio of latest and baseline policies with a threshold, while its minimization target is unclear. This paper proposes a new variant of PPO by considering a regularization problem of relative Pearson (RPE) divergence, so-called PPO-RPE. Through four benchmark tasks, PPO-RPE performed as well as or better than the conventional methods in terms of the task performance by the learned policy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-07T09:11:22Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.