Evaluating LLM-persona Generated Distributions for Decision-making

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.06357v1
• Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2026 03:39:15 GMT
• Title: Evaluating LLM-persona Generated Distributions for Decision-making
• Abstract summary: LLMs can generate a wealth of data, ranging from simulated personas imitating human valuations and preferences to demand forecasts based on world knowledge.<n>How well do such LLM-generated distributions support downstream decision-making?<n>We study metrics to evaluate the quality of these LLM-generated distributions, based on the decisions they induce.
• Score: 8.190530023131876
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: LLMs can generate a wealth of data, ranging from simulated personas imitating human valuations and preferences, to demand forecasts based on world knowledge. But how well do such LLM-generated distributions support downstream decision-making? For example, when pricing a new product, a firm could prompt an LLM to simulate how much consumers are willing to pay based on a product description, but how useful is the resulting distribution for optimizing the price? We refer to this approach as LLM-SAA, in which an LLM is used to construct an estimated distribution and the decision is then optimized under that distribution. In this paper, we study metrics to evaluate the quality of these LLM-generated distributions, based on the decisions they induce. Taking three canonical decision-making problems (assortment optimization, pricing, and newsvendor) as examples, we find that LLM-generated distributions are practically useful, especially in low-data regimes. We also show that decision-agnostic metrics such as Wasserstein distance can be misleading when evaluating these distributions for decision-making.

Related papers

• LLM-as-a-Verifier: A General-Purpose Verification Framework [74.40111651545979]
  We introduce LLM-as-a-Verifier, a general-purpose verification framework.<n>It provides fine-grained feedback for agentic tasks without requiring additional training.<n>It achieves state-of-the-art performance on several benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-06T17:59:35Z)
• Causal methods for LLM development and evaluation [49.64304126945395]
  Large language model (LLM) development is currently driven by large-scale empirical iteration over data mixtures, reward models, routing strategies, and evaluation pipelines.<n>Here, we argue that many central questions in LLM development and evaluation are inherently causal.<n>We argue that causal methods are potentially underutilized for the LLM development and evaluation pipeline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-25T16:15:44Z)
• Evidence-based Distributional Alignment for Large Language Models [58.65469623911573]
  We propose Evi-DA, an evidence-based alignment technique that improves the fidelity and robustness of LLM-based distribution estimation.<n>Given a target country, Evi-DA retrieves related World Values Survey items and their answer distributions, predicts a coarse Welzel value signature for each option, and infers the country-conditioned answer distribution in a structured format.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-03T03:34:06Z)
• LLM-Auction: Generative Auction towards LLM-Native Advertising [10.695066036409274]
  We propose a learning-based generative auction mechanism that integrates auction and LLM generation for LLM-native advertising.<n>We introduce Iterative Reward-Preference Optimization (IRPO) algorithm that alternately optimize the reward model and the LLM.<n>We show that LLM-Auction significantly outperforms existing baselines in allocation efficiency, while achieving the desired mechanism properties.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-11T11:31:20Z)
• LLMs for Resource Allocation: A Participatory Budgeting Approach to Inferring Preferences [17.089038477886486]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly expected to handle complex decision-making tasks, but their ability to perform structured resource allocation remains underexplored.<n>We present a dual-purpose framework leveraging Participatory Budgeting (PB) both as (i) a practical setting for LLM-based resource allocation and (ii) an adaptive benchmark for evaluating their reasoning capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-08T06:45:07Z)
• Bayesian Teaching Enables Probabilistic Reasoning in Large Language Models [54.38054999271322]
  We show that large language models (LLMs) don't update their beliefs as expected from the Bayesian framework.<n>We teach the LLMs to reason in a Bayesian manner by training them to mimic the predictions of the normative Bayesian model.<n>More generally, our results indicate that LLMs can effectively learn reasoning skills from examples and generalize those skills to new domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-21T20:13:04Z)
• Latent Factor Models Meets Instructions: Goal-conditioned Latent Factor Discovery without Task Supervision [50.45597801390757]
  Instruct-LF is a goal-oriented latent factor discovery system.<n>It integrates instruction-following ability with statistical models to handle noisy datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-21T02:03:08Z)
• LLM-Assisted Relevance Assessments: When Should We Ask LLMs for Help? [20.998805709422292]
  Test collections are information-retrieval tools that allow researchers to quickly and easily evaluate ranking algorithms.<n>As a cheaper alternative, recent studies have proposed using large language models (LLMs) to completely replace human assessors.<n>We propose LARA, an effective method to balance manual annotations with LLM annotations, helping build a rich and reliable test collection even under a low budget.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-11T11:17:35Z)
• A Little Help Goes a Long Way: Efficient LLM Training by Leveraging Small LMs [74.35290684163718]
  A primary challenge in large language model (LLM) development is their onerous pre-training cost. This paper explores a promising paradigm to improve LLM pre-training efficiency and quality by leveraging a small language model (SLM)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-24T14:31:52Z)
• Efficient Sequential Decision Making with Large Language Models [19.083642464977224]
  This paper focuses on extending the success of large language models (LLMs) to sequential decision making.<n>We propose a new approach that leverages online model selection algorithms to efficiently incorporate LLMs agents into sequential decision making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T22:13:22Z)
• DnA-Eval: Enhancing Large Language Model Evaluation through Decomposition and Aggregation [75.81096662788254]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are scalable and economical evaluators.<n>The question of how reliable these evaluators are has emerged as a crucial research question.<n>We propose Decompose and Aggregate, which breaks down the evaluation process into different stages based on pedagogical practices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-24T08:12:30Z)
• REQUAL-LM: Reliability and Equity through Aggregation in Large Language Models [10.684722193666607]
  We introduce REQUAL-LM, a novel method for finding reliable and equitable large language models (LLMs) outputs through aggregation. Specifically, we develop a Monte Carlo method based on repeated sampling to find a reliable output close to the mean of the underlying distribution of possible outputs. We formally define the terms such as reliability and bias, and design an equity-aware aggregation to minimize harmful bias while finding a highly reliable output.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-17T22:12:41Z)
• Do LLMs Play Dice? Exploring Probability Distribution Sampling in Large Language Models for Behavioral Simulation [73.58618024960968]
  An increasing number of studies are employing large language models (LLMs) as agents to emulate the sequential decision-making processes of humans.<n>This arouses curiosity regarding the capacity of LLM agents to comprehend probability distributions.<n>Our analysis indicates that LLM agents can understand probabilities, but they struggle with probability sampling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-13T16:59:28Z)
• $\forall$uto$\exists$val: Autonomous Assessment of LLMs in Formal Synthesis and Interpretation Tasks [21.12437562185667]
  This paper presents a new approach for scaling LLM assessment in translating formal syntax to natural language. We use context-free grammars (CFGs) to generate out-of-distribution datasets on the fly. We also conduct an assessment of several SOTA closed and open-source LLMs to showcase the feasibility and scalability of this paradigm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-27T08:08:00Z)
• Regression-aware Inference with LLMs [52.764328080398805]
  We show that an inference strategy can be sub-optimal for common regression and scoring evaluation metrics. We propose alternate inference strategies that estimate the Bayes-optimal solution for regression and scoring metrics in closed-form from sampled responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-07T03:24:34Z)
• From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuning [52.257422715393574]
  We introduce a self-guided methodology for Large Language Models (LLMs) to autonomously discern and select cherry samples from open-source datasets. Our key innovation, the Instruction-Following Difficulty (IFD) metric, emerges as a pivotal metric to identify discrepancies between a model's expected responses and its intrinsic generation capability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-23T09:45:29Z)
• LaGR-SEQ: Language-Guided Reinforcement Learning with Sample-Efficient Querying [71.86163159193327]
  Large language models (LLMs) have recently demonstrated their impressive ability to provide context-aware responses via text. This ability could potentially be used to predict plausible solutions in sequential decision making tasks pertaining to pattern completion. We introduce LaGR, which uses this predictive ability of LLMs to propose solutions to tasks that have been partially completed by a primary reinforcement learning (RL) agent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-21T02:07:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.