Triggered: A Statistical Analysis of Environmental Influences on Extremist Groups

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.09289v1
• Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2026 00:15:46 GMT
• Title: Triggered: A Statistical Analysis of Environmental Influences on Extremist Groups
• Authors: Christine de Kock, Eduard Hovy,
• Abstract summary: We study how online extremist communities operate within a wider information ecosystem shaped by real-world events, news coverage, and cross-community interaction.<n>We ask three questions: how extremist violence impacts community behaviour; whether news coverage of political entities predicts shifts in conversation dynamics; and whether linguistic diffusion occurs between mainstream and extremist spaces and across extremist ideologies.
• Score: 12.011691256278956
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Online extremist communities operate within a wider information ecosystem shaped by real-world events, news coverage, and cross-community interaction. We adopt a systems perspective to examine these influences using seven years of data from two ideologically distinct extremist forums (Stormfront and Incels) and a mainstream reference community (r/News). We ask three questions: how extremist violence impacts community behaviour; whether news coverage of political entities predicts shifts in conversation dynamics; and whether linguistic diffusion occurs between mainstream and extremist spaces and across extremist ideologies. Methodologically, we combine counterfactual synthesis to estimate event-level impacts with vector autoregression and Granger causality analyses to model ongoing relationships among news signals, behavioural outcomes, and cross-community language change. Across analyses, our results indicate that Stormfront and r/News appear to be more reactive to external stimuli, while Incels demonstrates less cross-community linguistic influence and less responsiveness to news and violent events. These findings underscore that extremist communities are not homogeneous, but differ in how tightly they are coupled to the surrounding information ecosystem.

Related papers

• Ideology and polarization set the agenda on social media [32.6608163255408]
  This study analyzes large-scale Twitter data from three global debates--Climate Change, COVID-19, and the Russo-Ukrainian War--to investigate the structural dynamics of engagement.<n>Our findings reveal that discussions are not primarily shaped by specific categories of actors, such as media or activists, but by shared ideological alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-06T16:48:22Z)
• Fear and Loathing on the Frontline: Decoding the Language of Othering by Russia-Ukraine War Bloggers [6.632254395574994]
  Othering, the act of portraying outgroups as fundamentally different from the ingroup, often escalates into framing them as existential threats. These dynamics are alarmingly pervasive, spanning from the extreme historical examples of genocides against minorities in Germany and Rwanda to the ongoing violence and rhetoric targeting migrants in the US and Europe. Our framework, designed to offer deeper insights into othering dynamics, combines with a rapid adaptation process to provide essential tools for mitigating othering's adverse impacts on social cohesion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-19T19:56:03Z)
• Authenticity and exclusion: social media algorithms and the dynamics of belonging in epistemic communities [0.8287206589886879]
  This paper examines how social media platforms and their recommendation algorithms shape the professional visibility and opportunities of researchers from minority groups. Using agent-based simulations, we uncover three key patterns: First, these algorithms disproportionately harm the professional visibility of researchers from minority groups. Second, within these minority groups, the algorithms result in greater visibility for users who more closely resemble the majority group, incentivizing assimilation at the cost of professional invisibility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-11T14:36:58Z)
• Bridging or Breaking: Impact of Intergroup Interactions on Religious Polarization [10.640364016644883]
  We examine whether intergroup interactions around important events affect polarization between majority and minority groups in social networks. We use data on the religious identity of nearly 700,000 Indian Twitter users engaging in COVID-19-related discourse during 2020. We find that for political and social events, intergroup interactions reduce polarization. This decline is weaker for individuals at the extreme who already exhibit high conformity to their group. In contrast, during communal events, intergroup interactions can increase group conformity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-19T07:21:09Z)
• Decoding the Silent Majority: Inducing Belief Augmented Social Graph with Large Language Model for Response Forecasting [74.68371461260946]
  SocialSense is a framework that induces a belief-centered graph on top of an existent social network, along with graph-based propagation to capture social dynamics. Our method surpasses existing state-of-the-art in experimental evaluations for both zero-shot and supervised settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T06:17:02Z)
• Evidence of Demographic rather than Ideological Segregation in News Discussion on Reddit [9.875731068651561]
  We evaluate homophily and heterophily among ideological and demographic groups in a typical opinion formation context. We analyze user interactions across five years in the r/news community on Reddit.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-15T11:37:12Z)
• EDSA-Ensemble: an Event Detection Sentiment Analysis Ensemble Architecture [63.85863519876587]
  Using Sentiment Analysis to understand the polarity of each message belonging to an event, as well as the entire event, can help to better understand the general and individual feelings of significant trends and the dynamics on online social networks. We propose a new ensemble architecture, EDSA-Ensemble, that uses Event Detection and Sentiment Analysis to improve the detection of the polarity for current events from Social Media.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-30T11:56:08Z)
• Unveiling the Hidden Agenda: Biases in News Reporting and Consumption [59.55900146668931]
  We build a six-year dataset on the Italian vaccine debate and adopt a Bayesian latent space model to identify narrative and selection biases. We found a nonlinear relationship between biases and engagement, with higher engagement for extreme positions. Analysis of news consumption on Twitter reveals common audiences among news outlets with similar ideological positions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-14T18:58:42Z)
• Nothing Stands Alone: Relational Fake News Detection with Hypergraph Neural Networks [49.29141811578359]
  We propose to leverage a hypergraph to represent group-wise interaction among news, while focusing on important news relations with its dual-level attention mechanism. Our approach yields remarkable performance and maintains the high performance even with a small subset of labeled news data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-24T00:19:32Z)
• ExtremeBB: A Database for Large-Scale Research into Online Hate, Harassment, the Manosphere and Extremism [12.647120939857635]
  We introduce ExtremeBB, a textual database of over 53.5M posts made by 38.5k users on 12 extremist bulletin board forums promoting online hate, harassment, the manosphere and other forms of extremism. It enables large-scale analyses of qualitative and quantitative historical trends going back two decades. ExtremeBB comes with a robust ethical data-sharing regime that allows us to share data with academics worldwide.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-08T13:15:25Z)
• News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
  We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation. Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content. The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z)
• COVID-19: The Information Warfare Paradigm Shift [0.0]
  In information warfare, recent years studies and government lines of efforts have been to engage fake news, electoral interference, and fight extremist social media as the primary combat theater in the information space. The COVID-19 pandemic generates a rebuttal of these assumptions. What we have seen with COVID-19, as an indicator, is that what is related to public health is far more powerful to swing public sentiment and create reactions within the citizenry that are trigger impact at a larger magnitude that has rippled through society in multiple directions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-02T18:04:00Z)
• Information Consumption and Social Response in a Segregated Environment: the Case of Gab [74.5095691235917]
  This work provides a characterization of the interaction patterns within Gab around the COVID-19 topic. We find that there are no strong statistical differences in the social response to questionable and reliable content. Our results provide insights toward the understanding of coordinated inauthentic behavior and on the early-warning of information operation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-03T11:34:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.