Multi-Level Strategic Classification: Incentivizing Improvement through Promotion and Relegation Dynamics

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.11439v1
• Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2026 23:35:21 GMT
• Title: Multi-Level Strategic Classification: Incentivizing Improvement through Promotion and Relegation Dynamics
• Authors: Ziyuan Huang, Lina Alkarmi, Mingyan Liu,
• Abstract summary: We study the problem where self-interested individuals or agents manipulate their response to obtain favorable decision outcomes.<n>Our model captures the critical inter-temporal incentives driven by an agent's farsightedness, skill retention, and a leg-up effect where qualification and attainment can be self-reinforcing.<n>We prove that under mild conditions, this mechanism enables agents to reach arbitrarily high levels solely through genuine improvement efforts.
• Score: 11.395181681423892
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Strategic classification studies the problem where self-interested individuals or agents manipulate their response to obtain favorable decision outcomes made by classifiers, typically turning to dishonest actions when they are less costly than genuine efforts. While existing studies on sequential strategic classification primarily focus on optimizing dynamic classifier weights, we depart from these weight-centric approaches by analyzing the design of classifier thresholds and difficulty progression within a multi-level promotion-relegation framework. Our model captures the critical inter-temporal incentives driven by an agent's farsightedness, skill retention, and a leg-up effect where qualification and attainment can be self-reinforcing. We characterize the agent's optimal long-term strategy and demonstrate that a principal can design a sequence of thresholds to effectively incentivize honest effort. Crucially, we prove that under mild conditions, this mechanism enables agents to reach arbitrarily high levels solely through genuine improvement efforts.

Related papers

• Integrating Diverse Assignment Strategies into DETRs [61.61489761918158]
  Label assignment is a critical component in object detectors, particularly within DETR-style frameworks.<n>We propose LoRA-DETR, a flexible and lightweight framework that seamlessly integrates diverse assignment strategies into any DETR-style detector.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-14T07:28:54Z)
• CARL: Critical Action Focused Reinforcement Learning for Multi-Step Agent [53.56274149236814]
  We propose CARL, a critical-action-focused reinforcement learning algorithm tailored for multi-step agents.<n>Carl achieves both stronger performance and higher efficiency during training and inference across diverse evaluation settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-04T16:15:46Z)
• CATArena: Evaluation of LLM Agents through Iterative Tournament Competitions [49.02422075498554]
  Large Language Model (LLM) agents have evolved from basic text generation to autonomously completing complex tasks through interaction with external tools.<n>In this work, we emphasize the importance of learning ability, including both self-improvement and peer-learning, as a core driver for agent evolution toward human-level intelligence.<n>We propose an iterative, competitive peer-learning framework, which allows agents to refine and optimize their strategies through repeated interactions and feedback.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-30T15:22:53Z)
• Emergent Hierarchical Reasoning in LLMs through Reinforcement Learning [56.496001894673235]
  Reinforcement Learning (RL) has proven highly effective at enhancing the complex reasoning abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>Our analysis reveals that puzzling phenomena like aha moments", length-scaling'' and entropy dynamics are not disparate occurrences but hallmarks of an emergent reasoning hierarchy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-03T18:52:49Z)
• Learning to Lead: Incentivizing Strategic Agents in the Dark [50.93875404941184]
  We study an online learning version of the generalized principal-agent model.<n>We develop the first provably sample-efficient algorithm for this challenging setting.<n>We establish a near optimal $tildeO(sqrtT) $ regret bound for learning the principal's optimal policy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-10T04:25:04Z)
• From Novice to Expert: LLM Agent Policy Optimization via Step-wise Reinforcement Learning [62.54484062185869]
  We introduce StepAgent, which utilizes step-wise reward to optimize the agent's reinforcement learning process.<n>We propose implicit-reward and inverse reinforcement learning techniques to facilitate agent reflection and policy adjustment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-06T10:35:11Z)
• Algorithmic Decision-Making under Agents with Persistent Improvement [9.296248945826084]
  We study algorithmic decision-making under human's strategic behavior. We first develop a dynamic model to characterize persistent improvements. We then study how the decision-maker can design an optimal policy to incentivize the largest improvements inside the agent population.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-03T01:36:35Z)
• Joint Intrinsic Motivation for Coordinated Exploration in Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning [0.0]
  We propose an approach for rewarding strategies where agents collectively exhibit novel behaviors. Jim rewards joint trajectories based on a centralized measure of novelty designed to function in continuous environments. Results show that joint exploration is crucial for solving tasks where the optimal strategy requires a high level of coordination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-06T13:02:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.