Calibrated Bayesian Deep Learning for Explainable Decision Support Systems Based on Medical Imaging
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.11973v1
- Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2026 14:03:41 GMT
- Title: Calibrated Bayesian Deep Learning for Explainable Decision Support Systems Based on Medical Imaging
- Authors: Hua Xu, Julián D. Arias-Londoño, Juan I. Godino-Llorente,
- Abstract summary: It is imperative that models quantify uncertainty in a manner that correlates with prediction correctness, allowing clinicians to identify unreliable outputs for further review.<n>The present paper proposes a generalizable probabilistic optimization framework grounded in Bayesian deep learning.<n>Specifically, a novel Confidence-Uncertainty Boundary Loss (CUB-Loss) is introduced that imposes penalties on high-certainty errors and low-certainty correct predictions.<n>The proposed framework is validated on three distinct medical imaging tasks: automatic screening of pneumonia, diabetic retinopathy detection, and identification of skin lesions.
- Score: 6.826979426009301
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: In critical decision support systems based on medical imaging, the reliability of AI-assisted decision-making is as relevant as predictive accuracy. Although deep learning models have demonstrated significant accuracy, they frequently suffer from miscalibration, manifested as overconfidence in erroneous predictions. To facilitate clinical acceptance, it is imperative that models quantify uncertainty in a manner that correlates with prediction correctness, allowing clinicians to identify unreliable outputs for further review. In order to address this necessity, the present paper proposes a generalizable probabilistic optimization framework grounded in Bayesian deep learning. Specifically, a novel Confidence-Uncertainty Boundary Loss (CUB-Loss) is introduced that imposes penalties on high-certainty errors and low-certainty correct predictions, explicitly enforcing alignment between prediction correctness and uncertainty estimates. Complementing this training-time optimization, a Dual Temperature Scaling (DTS) strategy is devised for post-hoc calibration, further refining the posterior distribution to improve intuitive explainability. The proposed framework is validated on three distinct medical imaging tasks: automatic screening of pneumonia, diabetic retinopathy detection, and identification of skin lesions. Empirical results demonstrate that the proposed approach achieves consistent calibration improvements across diverse modalities, maintains robust performance in data-scarce scenarios, and remains effective on severely imbalanced datasets, underscoring its potential for real clinical deployment.
Related papers
- Guideline-Grounded Evidence Accumulation for High-Stakes Agent Verification [60.18369393468405]
Existing verifiers usually underperform owing to a lack of domain knowledge and limited calibration.<n>GLEAN compiles expert-curated protocols into trajectory-informed, well-calibrated correctness signals.<n>We empirically validate GLEAN with agentic clinical diagnosis across three diseases from the MIMIC-IV dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-03T09:36:43Z) - Enhancing Safety in Diabetic Retinopathy Detection: Uncertainty-Aware Deep Learning Models with Rejection Capabilities [0.0]
Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a major cause of visual impairment.<n>Deep learning models have demonstrated great success identifying DR from retinal images.<n>This paper investigates an alternative in uncertainty-aware deep learning models, including a rejection mechanism to reject low-confidence predictions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-26T01:47:43Z) - Hesitation is defeat? Connecting Linguistic and Predictive Uncertainty [2.8186733524862158]
This paper investigates the relationship between predictive uncertainty and human/linguistic uncertainty, as estimated from free-text reports labelled by rule-based labellers.<n>The results demonstrate good model performance, but also a modest correlation between predictive and linguistic uncertainty, highlighting the challenges in aligning machine uncertainty with human interpretation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-06T18:34:37Z) - SepsisLab: Early Sepsis Prediction with Uncertainty Quantification and Active Sensing [67.8991481023825]
Sepsis is the leading cause of in-hospital mortality in the USA.
Existing predictive models are usually trained on high-quality data with few missing information.
For the potential high-risk patients with low confidence due to limited observations, we propose a robust active sensing algorithm.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-24T04:47:36Z) - HypUC: Hyperfine Uncertainty Calibration with Gradient-boosted
Corrections for Reliable Regression on Imbalanced Electrocardiograms [3.482894964998886]
We propose HypUC, a framework for imbalanced probabilistic regression in medical time series.
HypUC is evaluated on a large, diverse, real-world dataset of ECGs collected from millions of patients.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-23T06:17:31Z) - Improving Robustness and Reliability in Medical Image Classification with Latent-Guided Diffusion and Nested-Ensembles [4.249986624493547]
Once deployed, medical image analysis methods are often faced with unexpected image corruptions and noise perturbations.<n>LaDiNE is a novel ensemble learning method combining the robustness of Vision Transformers with diffusion-based generative models.<n>Experiments on tuberculosis chest X-rays and melanoma skin cancer datasets demonstrate that LaDiNE achieves superior performance compared to a wide range of state-of-the-art methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-24T15:53:07Z) - Towards Reliable Medical Image Segmentation by Modeling Evidential Calibrated Uncertainty [57.023423137202485]
Concerns regarding the reliability of medical image segmentation persist among clinicians.<n>We introduce DEviS, an easily implementable foundational model that seamlessly integrates into various medical image segmentation networks.<n>By leveraging subjective logic theory, we explicitly model probability and uncertainty for medical image segmentation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-01T05:02:46Z) - Improving Trustworthiness of AI Disease Severity Rating in Medical
Imaging with Ordinal Conformal Prediction Sets [0.7734726150561088]
A lack of statistically rigorous uncertainty quantification is a significant factor undermining trust in AI results.
Recent developments in distribution-free uncertainty quantification present practical solutions for these issues.
We demonstrate a technique for forming ordinal prediction sets that are guaranteed to contain the correct stenosis severity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-05T18:01:20Z) - Clinical Outcome Prediction from Admission Notes using Self-Supervised
Knowledge Integration [55.88616573143478]
Outcome prediction from clinical text can prevent doctors from overlooking possible risks.
Diagnoses at discharge, procedures performed, in-hospital mortality and length-of-stay prediction are four common outcome prediction targets.
We propose clinical outcome pre-training to integrate knowledge about patient outcomes from multiple public sources.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-08T10:26:44Z) - UNITE: Uncertainty-based Health Risk Prediction Leveraging Multi-sourced
Data [81.00385374948125]
We present UNcertaInTy-based hEalth risk prediction (UNITE) model.
UNITE provides accurate disease risk prediction and uncertainty estimation leveraging multi-sourced health data.
We evaluate UNITE on real-world disease risk prediction tasks: nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NASH) and Alzheimer's disease (AD)
UNITE achieves up to 0.841 in F1 score for AD detection, up to 0.609 in PR-AUC for NASH detection, and outperforms various state-of-the-art baselines by up to $19%$ over the best baseline.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-22T02:28:11Z) - Unlabelled Data Improves Bayesian Uncertainty Calibration under
Covariate Shift [100.52588638477862]
We develop an approximate Bayesian inference scheme based on posterior regularisation.
We demonstrate the utility of our method in the context of transferring prognostic models of prostate cancer across globally diverse populations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-26T13:50:19Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.