RGAlign-Rec: Ranking-Guided Alignment for Latent Query Reasoning in Recommendation Systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.12968v1
• Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2026 14:38:02 GMT
• Title: RGAlign-Rec: Ranking-Guided Alignment for Latent Query Reasoning in Recommendation Systems
• Authors: Junhua Liu, Yang Jihao, Cheng Chang, Kunrong LI, Bin Fu, Kwan Hui Lim,
• Abstract summary: We propose RGAlign-Rec, a closed-loop alignment framework for proactive intent prediction.<n>We also introduce Ranking-Guided Alignment (RGA), a multi-stage training paradigm.<n>Our framework achieves a 0.12% gain in GAUC, leading to a significant 3.52% relative reduction in error rate, and a 0.56% improvement in Recall@3.
• Score: 25.34524038198569
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Proactive intent prediction is a critical capability in modern e-commerce chatbots, enabling "zero-query" recommendations by anticipating user needs from behavioral and contextual signals. However, existing industrial systems face two fundamental challenges: (1) the semantic gap between discrete user features and the semantic intents within the chatbot's Knowledge Base, and (2) the objective misalignment between general-purpose LLM outputs and task-specific ranking utilities. To address these issues, we propose RGAlign-Rec, a closed-loop alignment framework that integrates an LLM-based semantic reasoner with a Query-Enhanced (QE) ranking model. We also introduce Ranking-Guided Alignment (RGA), a multi-stage training paradigm that utilizes downstream ranking signals as feedback to refine the LLM's latent reasoning. Extensive experiments on a large-scale industrial dataset from Shopee demonstrate that RGAlign-Rec achieves a 0.12% gain in GAUC, leading to a significant 3.52% relative reduction in error rate, and a 0.56% improvement in Recall@3. Online A/B testing further validates the cumulative effectiveness of our framework: the Query-Enhanced model (QE-Rec) initially yields a 0.98% improvement in CTR, while the subsequent Ranking-Guided Alignment stage contributes an additional 0.13% gain. These results indicate that ranking-aware alignment effectively synchronizes semantic reasoning with ranking objectives, significantly enhancing both prediction accuracy and service quality in real-world proactive recommendation systems.

Related papers

• PRECTR-V2:Unified Relevance-CTR Framework with Cross-User Preference Mining, Exposure Bias Correction, and LLM-Distilled Encoder Optimization [6.17916814159778]
  In search systems, effectively coordinating the two core objectives of search relevance matching and click-through rate (CTR) prediction is crucial.<n>We propose PRECTR-V2, which mitigates the low-activity users' sparse behavior problem by mining global relevance preferences.<n>This encoder replaces the frozen BERT module, enabling better adaptation to CTR fine-tuning and advancing beyond the traditional Emb+MLP paradigm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-24T08:26:17Z)
• CaliCausalRank: Calibrated Multi-Objective Ad Ranking with Robust Counterfactual Utility Optimization [9.601427882648116]
  CaliCausalRank is a framework that integrates training-time scale calibration, constraint-based multi-objective optimization, and robust counterfactual utility estimation.<n>Our approach treats score calibration as a first-class training objective rather than post-hoc processing, employs Lagrangian relaxation for constraint satisfaction, and achieves variance-reduced counterfactual estimators for reliable offline evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-21T10:35:12Z)
• Generative Reasoning Re-ranker [24.386586034456673]
  Generative Reasoning Reranker (GR2) is an end-to-end framework with a three-stage training pipeline tailored for reranking.<n> GR2 generates high-quality reasoning traces through carefully designed prompting and rejection sampling.<n>Experiments on two real-world datasets demonstrate GR2's effectiveness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-08T02:12:24Z)
• Practical RAG Evaluation: A Rarity-Aware Set-Based Metric and Cost-Latency-Quality Trade-offs [0.0]
  This paper addresses the guessing game in building production RAG.<n>There is no standardized, reproducible way to build and audit golden sets.<n>Rath-gs (MIT) is a lean golden-set pipeline with Plackett-Luce listwise refinement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-12T18:49:21Z)
• Conditional Advantage Estimation for Reinforcement Learning in Large Reasoning Models [50.84995206660551]
  We introduce Conditional advANtage estimatiON (CANON) to amplify the impact of a target metric without presuming its direction.<n>CANON based on entropy consistently outperforms prior methods on both math reasoning and high-complexity logic tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-28T16:33:07Z)
• RAG-Zeval: Towards Robust and Interpretable Evaluation on RAG Responses through End-to-End Rule-Guided Reasoning [64.46921169261852]
  RAG-Zeval is a novel end-to-end framework that formulates faithfulness and correctness evaluation as a rule-guided reasoning task.<n>Our approach trains evaluators with reinforcement learning, facilitating compact models to generate comprehensive and sound assessments.<n>Experiments demonstrate RAG-Zeval's superior performance, achieving the strongest correlation with human judgments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-28T14:55:33Z)
• In-context Ranking Preference Optimization [65.5489745857577]
  We propose an In-context Ranking Preference Optimization (IRPO) framework to optimize large language models (LLMs) based on ranking lists constructed during inference.<n>We show IRPO outperforms standard DPO approaches in ranking performance, highlighting its effectiveness in aligning LLMs with direct in-context ranking preferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-21T23:06:12Z)
• Retrieval is Not Enough: Enhancing RAG Reasoning through Test-Time Critique and Optimization [58.390885294401066]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has become a widely adopted paradigm for enabling knowledge-grounded large language models (LLMs)<n>RAG pipelines often fail to ensure that model reasoning remains consistent with the evidence retrieved, leading to factual inconsistencies or unsupported conclusions.<n>We propose AlignRAG, a novel iterative framework grounded in Critique-Driven Alignment (CDA)<n>We introduce AlignRAG-auto, an autonomous variant that dynamically terminates refinement, removing the need to pre-specify the number of critique iterations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-21T04:56:47Z)
• Rank-R1: Enhancing Reasoning in LLM-based Document Rerankers via Reinforcement Learning [76.50690734636477]
  We introduce Rank-R1, a novel LLM-based reranker that performs reasoning over both the user query and candidate documents before performing the ranking task.<n>Our experiments on the TREC DL and BRIGHT datasets show that Rank-R1 is highly effective, especially for complex queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-08T03:14:26Z)
• The Dual-use Dilemma in LLMs: Do Empowering Ethical Capacities Make a Degraded Utility? [54.18519360412294]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) must balance between rejecting harmful requests for safety and accommodating legitimate ones for utility.<n>This paper presents a Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) based alignment framework that achieves better overall performance.<n>We analyze experimental results obtained from testing DeepSeek-R1 on our benchmark and reveal the critical ethical concerns raised by this highly acclaimed model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-20T06:35:01Z)
• PEAR: Position-Embedding-Agnostic Attention Re-weighting Enhances Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Zero Inference Overhead [24.611413814466978]
  Large language models (LLMs) enhanced with retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) have introduced a new paradigm for web search. Existing methods to enhance context awareness are often inefficient, incurring time or memory overhead during inference. We propose Position-Embedding-Agnostic attention Re-weighting (PEAR) which enhances the context awareness of LLMs with zero inference overhead.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-29T15:40:54Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.