Learning to Select Like Humans: Explainable Active Learning for Medical Imaging

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.13308v2
• Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2026 21:44:34 GMT
• Title: Learning to Select Like Humans: Explainable Active Learning for Medical Imaging
• Authors: Ifrat Ikhtear Uddin, Longwei Wang, Xiao Qin, Yang Zhou, KC Santosh,
• Abstract summary: We propose an explainability-guided active learning framework that integrates spatial attention alignment into a sample acquisition process.<n>We evaluate the framework using three expert-annotated medical imaging datasets.
• Score: 8.744178539108267
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Medical image analysis requires substantial labeled data for model training, yet expert annotation is expensive and time-consuming. Active learning (AL) addresses this challenge by strategically selecting the most informative samples for the annotation purpose, but traditional methods solely rely on predictive uncertainty while ignoring whether models learn from clinically meaningful features a critical requirement for clinical deployment. We propose an explainability-guided active learning framework that integrates spatial attention alignment into a sample acquisition process. Our approach advocates for a dual-criterion selection strategy combining: (i) classification uncertainty to identify informative examples, and (ii) attention misalignment with radiologist-defined regions-of-interest (ROIs) to target samples where the model focuses on incorrect features. By measuring misalignment between Grad-CAM attention maps and expert annotations using Dice similarity, our acquisition function judiciously identifies samples that enhance both predictive performance and spatial interpretability. We evaluate the framework using three expert-annotated medical imaging datasets, namely, BraTS (MRI brain tumors), VinDr-CXR (chest X-rays), and SIIM-COVID-19 (chest X-rays). Using only 570 strategically selected samples, our explainability-guided approach consistently outperforms random sampling across all the datasets, achieving 77.22% accuracy on BraTS, 52.37% on VinDr-CXR, and 52.66% on SIIM-COVID. Grad-CAM visualizations confirm that the models trained by our dual-criterion selection focus on diagnostically relevant regions, demonstrating that incorporating explanation guidance into sample acquisition yields superior data efficiency while maintaining clinical interpretability.

Related papers

• Expert-Guided Explainable Few-Shot Learning with Active Sample Selection for Medical Image Analysis [2.7946918847372277]
  Expert-Guided Explainable Few-Shot Learning and Explainability-Guided AL are presented.<n>EGxFSL integrates radiologist-defined regions-of-interest as spatial supervision via Grad-CAM-based Dice loss.<n>xGAL introduces iterative sample acquisition prioritizing both predictive uncertainty and attention misalignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-02T05:09:35Z)
• Longitudinal Vestibular Schwannoma Dataset with Consensus-based Human-in-the-loop Annotations [3.1898695141875772]
  This dataset includes 190 patients, with tumour annotations available for 534 longitudinal contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (T1CE) scans from 184 patients, and non-annotated T2-weighted scans from 6 patients.<n>We show that our approach enables effective and resource-efficient generalisation of automated segmentation models to a target data distribution.<n>It is estimated to enhance efficiency by approximately 37.4% compared to the conventional manual annotation process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-01T09:53:28Z)
• Expert-Guided Explainable Few-Shot Learning for Medical Image Diagnosis [2.7946918847372277]
  We propose an expert-guided explainable few-shot learning framework that integrates radiologist-provided regions of interest into model training.<n>We evaluate our framework on two distinct datasets: BraTS (MRI) and VinDr-CXR (Chest X-ray)<n>Our findings demonstrate the effectiveness of incorporating expert-guided attention supervision to bridge the gap between performance and interpretability in few-shot medical image diagnosis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-08T05:31:37Z)
• From Gaze to Insight: Bridging Human Visual Attention and Vision Language Model Explanation for Weakly-Supervised Medical Image Segmentation [48.45209969191245]
  Vision-language models (VLMs) provide semantic context through textual descriptions but lack explanation precision required.<n>We propose a teacher-student framework that integrates both gaze and language supervision, leveraging their complementary strengths.<n>Our method achieves Dice scores of 80.78%, 80.53%, and 84.22%, respectively, improving 3-5% over gaze baselines without increasing the annotation burden.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-15T16:32:15Z)
• MIL vs. Aggregation: Evaluating Patient-Level Survival Prediction Strategies Using Graph-Based Learning [52.231128973251124]
  We compare various strategies for predicting survival at the WSI and patient level.<n>The former treats each WSI as an independent sample, mimicking the strategy adopted in other works.<n>The latter comprises methods to either aggregate the predictions of the several WSIs or automatically identify the most relevant slide.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-29T11:14:02Z)
• Fairness Evolution in Continual Learning for Medical Imaging [47.52603262576663]
  This study examines how bias evolves across tasks using domain-specific fairness metrics and how different CL strategies impact this evolution.<n>Our results show that Learning without Forgetting and Pseudo-Label achieve optimal classification performance, but Pseudo-Label is less biased.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-10T09:48:52Z)
• Improving Multiple Sclerosis Lesion Segmentation Across Clinical Sites: A Federated Learning Approach with Noise-Resilient Training [75.40980802817349]
  Deep learning models have shown promise for automatically segmenting MS lesions, but the scarcity of accurately annotated data hinders progress in this area. We introduce a Decoupled Hard Label Correction (DHLC) strategy that considers the imbalanced distribution and fuzzy boundaries of MS lesions. We also introduce a Centrally Enhanced Label Correction (CELC) strategy, which leverages the aggregated central model as a correction teacher for all sites.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-31T00:36:10Z)
• TREEMENT: Interpretable Patient-Trial Matching via Personalized Dynamic Tree-Based Memory Network [54.332862955411656]
  Clinical trials are critical for drug development but often suffer from expensive and inefficient patient recruitment. In recent years, machine learning models have been proposed for speeding up patient recruitment via automatically matching patients with clinical trials. We introduce a dynamic tree-based memory network model named TREEMENT to provide accurate and interpretable patient trial matching.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-19T12:35:09Z)
• Vision-Language Modelling For Radiological Imaging and Reports In The Low Data Regime [70.04389979779195]
  This paper explores training medical vision-language models (VLMs) where the visual and language inputs are embedded into a common space. We explore several candidate methods to improve low-data performance, including adapting generic pre-trained models to novel image and text domains. Using text-to-image retrieval as a benchmark, we evaluate the performance of these methods with variable sized training datasets of paired chest X-rays and radiological reports.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-30T18:20:00Z)
• Interpretability-Driven Sample Selection Using Self Supervised Learning For Disease Classification And Segmentation [4.898744396854313]
  We propose a novel sample selection methodology based on deep features leveraging information contained in interpretability saliency maps. We show our proposed self supervised approach outperforms other approaches in selecting informative samples leading to state of the art performance with fewer samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-13T10:46:33Z)
• Cascaded Robust Learning at Imperfect Labels for Chest X-ray Segmentation [61.09321488002978]
  We present a novel cascaded robust learning framework for chest X-ray segmentation with imperfect annotation. Our model consists of three independent network, which can effectively learn useful information from the peer networks. Our methods could achieve a significant improvement on the accuracy in segmentation tasks compared to the previous methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-05T15:50:16Z)
• Select-ProtoNet: Learning to Select for Few-Shot Disease Subtype Prediction [55.94378672172967]
  We focus on few-shot disease subtype prediction problem, identifying subgroups of similar patients. We introduce meta learning techniques to develop a new model, which can extract the common experience or knowledge from interrelated clinical tasks. Our new model is built upon a carefully designed meta-learner, called Prototypical Network, that is a simple yet effective meta learning machine for few-shot image classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-02T02:50:30Z)
• BS-Net: learning COVID-19 pneumonia severity on a large Chest X-Ray dataset [6.5800499500032705]
  We design an end-to-end deep learning architecture for predicting, on Chest X-rays images (CXR), a multi-regional score conveying the degree of lung compromise in COVID-19 patients. We exploit a clinical dataset of almost 5,000 CXR annotated images collected in the same hospital. Our solution outperforms single human annotators in rating accuracy and consistency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-08T13:55:58Z)
• Semi-supervised Medical Image Classification with Relation-driven Self-ensembling Model [71.80319052891817]
  We present a relation-driven semi-supervised framework for medical image classification. It exploits the unlabeled data by encouraging the prediction consistency of given input under perturbations. Our method outperforms many state-of-the-art semi-supervised learning methods on both single-label and multi-label image classification scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-15T06:57:54Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.