Experiential Reinforcement Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.13949v1
• Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2026 01:23:48 GMT
• Title: Experiential Reinforcement Learning
• Authors: Taiwei Shi, Sihao Chen, Bowen Jiang, Linxin Song, Longqi Yang, Jieyu Zhao,
• Abstract summary: Experiential Reinforcement Learning (ERL) is a training paradigm that embeds an explicit experience-reflection-consolidation loop into the reinforcement learning process.<n>ERL consistently improves learning efficiency and final performance over strong reinforcement learning baselines.<n>These results suggest that integrating explicit self-reflection into policy training provides a practical mechanism for transforming feedback into durable behavioral improvement.
• Score: 22.545003569634982
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Reinforcement learning has become the central approach for language models (LMs) to learn from environmental reward or feedback. In practice, the environmental feedback is usually sparse and delayed. Learning from such signals is challenging, as LMs must implicitly infer how observed failures should translate into behavioral changes for future iterations. We introduce Experiential Reinforcement Learning (ERL), a training paradigm that embeds an explicit experience-reflection-consolidation loop into the reinforcement learning process. Given a task, the model generates an initial attempt, receives environmental feedback, and produces a reflection that guides a refined second attempt, whose success is reinforced and internalized into the base policy. This process converts feedback into structured behavioral revision, improving exploration and stabilizing optimization while preserving gains at deployment without additional inference cost. Across sparse-reward control environments and agentic reasoning benchmarks, ERL consistently improves learning efficiency and final performance over strong reinforcement learning baselines, achieving gains of up to +81% in complex multi-step environments and up to +11% in tool-using reasoning tasks. These results suggest that integrating explicit self-reflection into policy training provides a practical mechanism for transforming feedback into durable behavioral improvement.

Related papers

• Stabilizing Reinforcement Learning with LLMs: Formulation and Practices [61.361819972410046]
  We show why and under what conditions the true sequence-level reward can be optimized via a surrogate token-level objective in policy gradient methods such as REINFORCE.<n>This insight provides a principled explanation for the crucial role of several widely adopted techniques in stabilizing RL training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-01T07:45:39Z)
• Revisiting Entropy in Reinforcement Learning for Large Reasoning Models [54.96908589622163]
  We investigate the entropy dynamics of large language models trained withReinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR)<n>Our findings reveal that the number of off-policy updates, the diversity of training data, and the clipping thresholds in the optimization objective are critical factors influencing the entropy of LLMs trained with RLVR.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-08T12:50:41Z)
• Explore Data Left Behind in Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning Language Models [61.78513830395669]
  Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has emerged as an effective approach for improving the reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs)<n>As models train longer and scale larger, more training prompts become residual prompts, those with zero variance rewards that provide no training signal.<n>We propose the Explore Residual Prompts in Policy Optimization framework, which encourages exploration on residual prompts and reactivates their training signals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-06T20:40:27Z)
• LANPO: Bootstrapping Language and Numerical Feedback for Reinforcement Learning in LLMs [73.27182315028021]
  LANPO is a framework that cleanly separates the roles of feedback: language guides exploration, while numerical rewards drive optimization.<n>Our work provides a robust method for integrating historical experiences into the LLM RL loop, creating more effective and data-efficient learning agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-18T15:51:19Z)
• ExGRPO: Learning to Reason from Experience [82.83309610498446]
  Reinforcement learning from verifiable rewards (RLVR) is an emerging paradigm for improving the reasoning ability of large language models.<n>Standard on-policy training discards rollout experiences after a single update, leading to computational inefficiency and instability.<n>In this paper, we are the first to investigate what makes a reasoning experience valuable and identify rollout correctness and entropy as effective indicators of experience value.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-02T17:31:30Z)
• No Free Lunch: Rethinking Internal Feedback for LLM Reasoning [12.881043910316787]
  Reinforcement learning has emerged as a powerful paradigm for post-training large language models (LLMs) to improve reasoning.<n>We investigate an alternative class of methods, Reinforcement Learning from Internal Feedback (RLIF), which relies solely on intrinsic model-derived signals instead of external rewards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-20T17:59:52Z)
• Progress or Regress? Self-Improvement Reversal in Post-training [26.051637877066327]
  We propose a comprehensive evaluative framework to scrutinize the underlying enhancements of post-training paradigms for self-improvement. We show that models showing improved performance across benchmarks will paradoxically exhibit declines in broader, essential capabilities. These findings indicate that current self-improvement practices through post-training are inadequate for equipping models to tackle more complex problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-06T09:07:11Z)
• Hindsight-DICE: Stable Credit Assignment for Deep Reinforcement Learning [11.084321518414226]
  We adapt existing importance-sampling ratio estimation techniques for off-policy evaluation to drastically improve the stability and efficiency of so-called hindsight policy methods. Our hindsight distribution correction facilitates stable, efficient learning across a broad range of environments where credit assignment plagues baseline methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-21T20:54:52Z)
• Assessor-Guided Learning for Continual Environments [17.181933166255448]
  This paper proposes an assessor-guided learning strategy for continual learning. An assessor guides the learning process of a base learner by controlling the direction and pace of the learning process. The assessor is trained in a meta-learning manner with a meta-objective to boost the learning process of the base learner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-21T06:45:14Z)
• Imitating, Fast and Slow: Robust learning from demonstrations via decision-time planning [96.72185761508668]
  Planning at Test-time (IMPLANT) is a new meta-algorithm for imitation learning. We demonstrate that IMPLANT significantly outperforms benchmark imitation learning approaches on standard control environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-07T17:16:52Z)
• Self-Imitation Advantage Learning [43.8107780378031]
  Self-imitation learning is a Reinforcement Learning method that encourages actions whose returns were higher than expected. We propose a novel generalization of self-imitation learning for off-policy RL, based on a modification of the Bellman optimality operator.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-22T13:21:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.