Progress or Regress? Self-Improvement Reversal in Post-training

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.05013v1
• Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2024 09:07:11 GMT
• Title: Progress or Regress? Self-Improvement Reversal in Post-training
• Authors: Ting Wu, Xuefeng Li, Pengfei Liu,
• Abstract summary: We propose a comprehensive evaluative framework to scrutinize the underlying enhancements of post-training paradigms for self-improvement. We show that models showing improved performance across benchmarks will paradoxically exhibit declines in broader, essential capabilities. These findings indicate that current self-improvement practices through post-training are inadequate for equipping models to tackle more complex problems.
• Score: 26.051637877066327
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Self-improvement through post-training methods such as iterative preference learning has been acclaimed for enhancing the problem-solving capabilities (e.g., mathematical reasoning) of Large Language Models (LLMs) without human intervention. However, as exploration deepens, it becomes crucial to assess whether these improvements genuinely signify progress in solving more challenging problems or if they could lead to unintended regressions. To address this, we propose a comprehensive evaluative framework that goes beyond the superficial pass@1 metric to scrutinize the underlying enhancements of post-training paradigms for self-improvement. Through rigorous experimentation and analysis across diverse problem-solving tasks, the empirical results point out the phenomenon of \emph{self-improvement reversal}, where models showing improved performance across benchmarks will paradoxically exhibit declines in broader, essential capabilities, like output diversity and out-of-distribution (OOD) generalization. These findings indicate that current self-improvement practices through post-training are inadequate for equipping models to tackle more complex problems. Furthermore, they underscore the necessity of our critical evaluation metrics in discerning the \emph{progress or regress} dichotomy for self-improving LLMs.

Related papers

• Enhancing LLM Reasoning via Critique Models with Test-Time and Training-Time Supervision [120.40788744292739]
  We propose a two-player paradigm that separates the roles of reasoning and critique models. We first propose AutoMathCritique, an automated and scalable framework for collecting critique data. We demonstrate that the critique models consistently improve the actor's performance on difficult queries at test-time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-25T17:11:54Z)
• Recursive Introspection: Teaching Language Model Agents How to Self-Improve [30.086494067593268]
  We develop RISE: Recursive IntroSpEction, an approach for fine-tuning large language models. Our experiments show that RISE enables Llama2, Llama3, and Mistral models to improve themselves with more turns on math reasoning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-25T17:35:59Z)
• MR-Ben: A Meta-Reasoning Benchmark for Evaluating System-2 Thinking in LLMs [55.20845457594977]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown increasing capability in problem-solving and decision-making. We present a process-based benchmark MR-Ben that demands a meta-reasoning skill. Our meta-reasoning paradigm is especially suited for system-2 slow thinking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T03:50:23Z)
• Unlearning with Control: Assessing Real-world Utility for Large Language Model Unlearning [97.2995389188179]
  Recent research has begun to approach large language models (LLMs) unlearning via gradient ascent (GA) Despite their simplicity and efficiency, we suggest that GA-based methods face the propensity towards excessive unlearning. We propose several controlling methods that can regulate the extent of excessive unlearning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T14:41:00Z)
• Enhancing Q-Learning with Large Language Model Heuristics [0.0]
  Large language models (LLMs) can achieve zero-shot learning for simpler tasks, but they suffer from low inference speeds and occasional hallucinations. We propose textbfLLM-guided Q-learning, a framework that leverages LLMs as hallucinations to aid in learning the Q-function for reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-06T10:42:28Z)
• Improving the Robustness of Large Language Models via Consistency Alignment [36.24876571343749]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown tremendous success in following user instructions and generating helpful responses. LLMs may generate significantly inconsistent responses due to minor changes in the verbalized instructions. We propose a two-stage training framework consisting of instruction-augmented supervised fine-tuning and consistency alignment training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-21T08:21:12Z)
• Augmenting Unsupervised Reinforcement Learning with Self-Reference [63.68018737038331]
  Humans possess the ability to draw on past experiences explicitly when learning new tasks. We propose the Self-Reference (SR) approach, an add-on module explicitly designed to leverage historical information. Our approach achieves state-of-the-art results in terms of Interquartile Mean (IQM) performance and Optimality Gap reduction on the Unsupervised Reinforcement Learning Benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T09:07:34Z)
• QualEval: Qualitative Evaluation for Model Improvement [82.73561470966658]
  We propose QualEval, which augments quantitative scalar metrics with automated qualitative evaluation as a vehicle for model improvement. QualEval uses a powerful LLM reasoner and our novel flexible linear programming solver to generate human-readable insights. We demonstrate that leveraging its insights, for example, improves the absolute performance of the Llama 2 model by up to 15% points relative.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-06T00:21:44Z)
• N-Critics: Self-Refinement of Large Language Models with Ensemble of Critics [5.516095889257118]
  We propose a self-correction mechanism for Large Language Models (LLMs) to mitigate issues such as toxicity and fact hallucination. This method involves refining model outputs through an ensemble of critics and the model's own feedback.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-28T11:22:22Z)
• Towards Reliable and Fluent Large Language Models: Incorporating Feedback Learning Loops in QA Systems [10.58737969057445]
  We build a dataset to train a critic model capable of evaluating the citation, correctness, and fluency of responses generated by large language models. We propose an automated feedback mechanism that leverages the critic model to offer real-time feedback on heterogeneous aspects of generated text. Experimental results demonstrate the efficacy of our approach, including a 4% precision increase in citation and an approximately 8% enhancement in the MAUVE metric for fluency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-08T09:39:53Z)
• Accurate and Robust Feature Importance Estimation under Distribution Shifts [49.58991359544005]
  PRoFILE is a novel feature importance estimation method. We show significant improvements over state-of-the-art approaches, both in terms of fidelity and robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-30T05:29:01Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.