Bounding Probabilities of Causation with Partial Causal Diagrams

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14503v1
• Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2026 06:35:24 GMT
• Title: Bounding Probabilities of Causation with Partial Causal Diagrams
• Authors: Yuxuan Xie, Ang Li,
• Abstract summary: This paper proposes a general framework for bounding probabilities of causation using partial causal information.<n>We show how the available structural or statistical information can be systematically incorporated as constraints in a optimization programming formulation.<n>This approach extends the applicability of probabilities of causation to realistic settings where causal knowledge is incomplete but informative.
• Score: 10.218927169905607
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Probabilities of causation are fundamental to individual-level explanation and decision making, yet they are inherently counterfactual and not point-identifiable from data in general. Existing bounds either disregard available covariates, require complete causal graphs, or rely on restrictive binary settings, limiting their practical use. In real-world applications, causal information is often partial but nontrivial. This paper proposes a general framework for bounding probabilities of causation using partial causal information. We show how the available structural or statistical information can be systematically incorporated as constraints in a optimization programming formulation, yielding tighter and formally valid bounds without full identifiability. This approach extends the applicability of probabilities of causation to realistic settings where causal knowledge is incomplete but informative.

Related papers

• Use What You Know: Causal Foundation Models with Partial Graphs [97.91863420927866]
  Recently proposed Causal Foundation Models (CFMs) promise a more unified approach by amortising causal discovery and inference in a single step.<n>We bridge this gap by introducing methods to condition CFMs on causal information, such as the causal graph or more readily available ancestral information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-16T17:56:37Z)
• Data-Driven Information-Theoretic Causal Bounds under Unmeasured Confounding [10.590231532335691]
  We develop a data-driven information-theoretic framework for partial identification of conditional causal effects under unmeasured confounding.<n>Our key theoretical contribution shows that the f-divergence between the observational distribution P(Y | A = a, X = x) and the interventional distribution P(Y | do(A = a), X = x) is upper bounded by a function of the propensity score alone.<n>This result enables sharp partial identification of conditional causal effects directly from observational data, without requiring external sensitivity parameters, auxiliary variables, full structural specifications, or outcome boundedness assumptions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-23T20:47:48Z)
• Algorithmic causal structure emerging through compression [53.52699766206808]
  We explore the relationship between causality, symmetry, and compression.<n>We build on and generalize the known connection between learning and compression to a setting where causal models are not identifiable.<n>We define algorithmic causality as an alternative definition of causality when traditional assumptions for causal identifiability do not hold.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-06T16:50:57Z)
• Advancing Counterfactual Inference through Nonlinear Quantile Regression [77.28323341329461]
  We propose a framework for efficient and effective counterfactual inference implemented with neural networks. The proposed approach enhances the capacity to generalize estimated counterfactual outcomes to unseen data. Empirical results conducted on multiple datasets offer compelling support for our theoretical assertions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-09T08:30:51Z)
• Nonparametric Identifiability of Causal Representations from Unknown Interventions [63.1354734978244]
  We study causal representation learning, the task of inferring latent causal variables and their causal relations from mixtures of the variables. Our goal is to identify both the ground truth latents and their causal graph up to a set of ambiguities which we show to be irresolvable from interventional data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T10:51:58Z)
• Active Bayesian Causal Inference [72.70593653185078]
  We propose Active Bayesian Causal Inference (ABCI), a fully-Bayesian active learning framework for integrated causal discovery and reasoning. ABCI jointly infers a posterior over causal models and queries of interest. We show that our approach is more data-efficient than several baselines that only focus on learning the full causal graph.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-04T22:38:57Z)
• BayesIMP: Uncertainty Quantification for Causal Data Fusion [52.184885680729224]
  We study the causal data fusion problem, where datasets pertaining to multiple causal graphs are combined to estimate the average treatment effect of a target variable. We introduce a framework which combines ideas from probabilistic integration and kernel mean embeddings to represent interventional distributions in the reproducing kernel Hilbert space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T10:14:18Z)
• Bayesian Model Averaging for Data Driven Decision Making when Causality is Partially Known [0.0]
  We use ensemble methods like Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA) to infer set of causal graphs. We provide decisions by computing the expected value and risk of potential interventions explicitly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-12T01:55:45Z)
• Causal Expectation-Maximisation [70.45873402967297]
  We show that causal inference is NP-hard even in models characterised by polytree-shaped graphs. We introduce the causal EM algorithm to reconstruct the uncertainty about the latent variables from data about categorical manifest variables. We argue that there appears to be an unnoticed limitation to the trending idea that counterfactual bounds can often be computed without knowledge of the structural equations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-04T10:25:13Z)
• Deriving Bounds and Inequality Constraints Using LogicalRelations Among Counterfactuals [8.185725740857595]
  We develop a new method for obtaining bounds on causal parameters using rules of probability and restrictions on counterfactuals implied by causal models. We show that this approach is powerful enough to recover known sharp bounds and tight inequality constraints, and to derive novel bounds and constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-01T17:25:44Z)
• A Class of Algorithms for General Instrumental Variable Models [29.558215059892206]
  Causal treatment effect estimation is a key problem that arises in a variety of real-world settings. We provide a method for causal effect bounding in continuous distributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-11T12:32:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.