Quantifying and Attributing Submodel Uncertainty in Stochastic Simulation Models and Digital Twins

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.16099v1
• Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2026 00:06:39 GMT
• Title: Quantifying and Attributing Submodel Uncertainty in Stochastic Simulation Models and Digital Twins
• Authors: Mohammadmahdi Ghasemloo, David J. Eckman, Yaxian Li,
• Abstract summary: This paper investigates how submodel uncertainty affects the estimation of system performance metrics.<n>We develop a framework for quantifying submodel uncertainty in simulation models and extend the framework to digital-twin settings.
• Score: 0.1234398109349733
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Stochastic simulation is widely used to study complex systems composed of various interconnected subprocesses, such as input processes, routing and control logic, optimization routines, and data-driven decision modules. In practice, these subprocesses may be inherently unknown or too computationally intensive to directly embed in the simulation model. Replacing these elements with estimated or learned approximations introduces a form of epistemic uncertainty that we refer to as submodel uncertainty. This paper investigates how submodel uncertainty affects the estimation of system performance metrics. We develop a framework for quantifying submodel uncertainty in stochastic simulation models and extend the framework to digital-twin settings, where simulation experiments are repeatedly conducted with the model initialized from observed system states. Building on approaches from input uncertainty analysis, we leverage bootstrapping and Bayesian model averaging to construct quantile-based confidence or credible intervals for key performance indicators. We propose a tree-based method that decomposes total output variability and attributes uncertainty to individual submodels in the form of importance scores. The proposed framework is model-agnostic and accommodates both parametric and nonparametric submodels under frequentist and Bayesian modeling paradigms. A synthetic numerical experiment and a more realistic digital-twin simulation of a contact center illustrate the importance of understanding how and how much individual submodels contribute to overall uncertainty.

Related papers

• Tests for model misspecification in simulation-based inference: from local distortions to global model checks [2.0209172586699173]
  We provide a solid and flexible foundation for a wide range of model discrepancy analysis tasks.<n>We make explicit analytic connections to classical techniques: anomaly detection, model validation, and goodness-of-fit residual analysis.<n>We show how to conduct such a distortion-driven model misspecification test for real gravitational wave data, specifically on the event GW150914.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-19T17:48:03Z)
• Differentiable Calibration of Inexact Stochastic Simulation Models via Kernel Score Minimization [11.955062839855334]
  We propose to learn differentiable input parameters of simulation models using output-level data via kernel score minimization with gradient descent. We quantify the uncertainties of the learned input parameters using a new normality result that accounts for model inexactness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-08T04:13:52Z)
• Diffusion posterior sampling for simulation-based inference in tall data settings [53.17563688225137]
  Simulation-based inference ( SBI) is capable of approximating the posterior distribution that relates input parameters to a given observation. In this work, we consider a tall data extension in which multiple observations are available to better infer the parameters of the model. We compare our method to recently proposed competing approaches on various numerical experiments and demonstrate its superiority in terms of numerical stability and computational cost.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-11T09:23:36Z)
• Simultaneous identification of models and parameters of scientific simulators [7.473394133229206]
  We develop a simulation-based inference framework to identify essential model components. It can be applied to any compositional simulator without requiring evaluations. It reveals non-identifiable model components and parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T14:06:02Z)
• Mixed Effects Neural ODE: A Variational Approximation for Analyzing the Dynamics of Panel Data [50.23363975709122]
  We propose a probabilistic model called ME-NODE to incorporate (fixed + random) mixed effects for analyzing panel data. We show that our model can be derived using smooth approximations of SDEs provided by the Wong-Zakai theorem. We then derive Evidence Based Lower Bounds for ME-NODE, and develop (efficient) training algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-18T22:41:51Z)
• Learning continuous models for continuous physics [94.42705784823997]
  We develop a test based on numerical analysis theory to validate machine learning models for science and engineering applications. Our results illustrate how principled numerical analysis methods can be coupled with existing ML training/testing methodologies to validate models for science and engineering applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-17T07:56:46Z)
• Deep Bayesian Active Learning for Accelerating Stochastic Simulation [74.58219903138301]
  Interactive Neural Process (INP) is a deep active learning framework for simulations and with active learning approaches. For active learning, we propose a novel acquisition function, Latent Information Gain (LIG), calculated in the latent space of NP based models. The results demonstrate STNP outperforms the baselines in the learning setting and LIG achieves the state-of-the-art for active learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-05T01:31:51Z)
• MINIMALIST: Mutual INformatIon Maximization for Amortized Likelihood Inference from Sampled Trajectories [61.3299263929289]
  Simulation-based inference enables learning the parameters of a model even when its likelihood cannot be computed in practice. One class of methods uses data simulated with different parameters to infer an amortized estimator for the likelihood-to-evidence ratio. We show that this approach can be formulated in terms of mutual information between model parameters and simulated data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-03T12:59:16Z)
• Improving the Reconstruction of Disentangled Representation Learners via Multi-Stage Modeling [54.94763543386523]
  Current autoencoder-based disentangled representation learning methods achieve disentanglement by penalizing the ( aggregate) posterior to encourage statistical independence of the latent factors. We present a novel multi-stage modeling approach where the disentangled factors are first learned using a penalty-based disentangled representation learning method. Then, the low-quality reconstruction is improved with another deep generative model that is trained to model the missing correlated latent variables.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-25T18:51:15Z)
• Multiplicative noise and heavy tails in stochastic optimization [62.993432503309485]
  empirical optimization is central to modern machine learning, but its role in its success is still unclear. We show that it commonly arises in parameters of discrete multiplicative noise due to variance. A detailed analysis is conducted in which we describe on key factors, including recent step size, and data, all exhibit similar results on state-of-the-art neural network models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-11T09:58:01Z)
• Amortized Bayesian model comparison with evidential deep learning [0.12314765641075436]
  We propose a novel method for performing Bayesian model comparison using specialized deep learning architectures. Our method is purely simulation-based and circumvents the step of explicitly fitting all alternative models under consideration to each observed dataset. We show that our method achieves excellent results in terms of accuracy, calibration, and efficiency across the examples considered in this work.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-22T15:15:46Z)
• DISCO: Double Likelihood-free Inference Stochastic Control [29.84276469617019]
  We propose to leverage the power of modern simulators and recent techniques in Bayesian statistics for likelihood-free inference. The posterior distribution over simulation parameters is propagated through a potentially non-analytical model of the system. Experiments show that the controller proposed attained superior performance and robustness on classical control and robotics tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-18T05:29:40Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.