Balancing Multiple Objectives in Urban Traffic Control with Reinforcement Learning from AI Feedback

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.20728v1
• Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2026 09:47:25 GMT
• Title: Balancing Multiple Objectives in Urban Traffic Control with Reinforcement Learning from AI Feedback
• Authors: Chenyang Zhao, Vinny Cahill, Ivana Dusparic,
• Abstract summary: We show that multi-objective RLAIF can produce policies that yield balanced trade-offs reflecting different user priorities without laborious reward engineering.<n>We argue that integrating RLAIF into multi-objective RL offers a scalable path toward user-aligned policy learning.
• Score: 14.81819959351561
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Reward design has been one of the central challenges for real world reinforcement learning (RL) deployment, especially in settings with multiple objectives. Preference-based RL offers an appealing alternative by learning from human preferences over pairs of behavioural outcomes. More recently, RL from AI feedback (RLAIF) has demonstrated that large language models (LLMs) can generate preference labels at scale, mitigating the reliance on human annotators. However, existing RLAIF work typically focuses only on single-objective tasks, leaving the open question of how RLAIF handles systems that involve multiple objectives. In such systems trade-offs among conflicting objectives are difficult to specify, and policies risk collapsing into optimizing for a dominant goal. In this paper, we explore the extension of the RLAIF paradigm to multi-objective self-adaptive systems. We show that multi-objective RLAIF can produce policies that yield balanced trade-offs reflecting different user priorities without laborious reward engineering. We argue that integrating RLAIF into multi-objective RL offers a scalable path toward user-aligned policy learning in domains with inherently conflicting objectives.

Related papers

• MAESTRO: Meta-learning Adaptive Estimation of Scalarization Trade-offs for Reward Optimization [56.074760766965085]
  Group-Relative Policy Optimization has emerged as an efficient paradigm for aligning Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We propose MAESTRO, which treats reward scalarization as a dynamic latent policy, leveraging the model's terminal hidden states as a semantic bottleneck.<n>We formulate this as a contextual bandit problem within a bi-level optimization framework, where a lightweight Conductor network co-evolves with the policy by utilizing group-relative advantages as a meta-reward signal.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-12T05:02:48Z)
• Optimizing Safe and Aligned Language Generation: A Multi-Objective GRPO Approach [2.8626097661711394]
  Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback has achieved notable success in steering models, but is complex and can be unstable.<n>Recent approaches such as Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) simplify preference-based fine-tuning but may introduce bias or trade-off certain objectives.<n>We propose a Group Relative Policy Optimization framework with a multi-label reward regression model to achieve safe and aligned language generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-26T05:50:33Z)
• UC-MOA: Utility-Conditioned Multi-Objective Alignment for Distributional Pareto-Optimality [52.49062565901046]
  Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) has become a cornerstone for aligning large language models with human values.<n>Existing approaches struggle to capture the multi-dimensional, distributional nuances of human preferences.<n>We introduce Utility-Conditioned Multi-Objective Alignment (UC-MOA), a novel framework that overcomes these limitations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-10T09:52:42Z)
• Scaling Autonomous Agents via Automatic Reward Modeling And Planning [52.39395405893965]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across a range of tasks.<n>However, they still struggle with problems requiring multi-step decision-making and environmental feedback.<n>We propose a framework that can automatically learn a reward model from the environment without human annotations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T18:49:25Z)
• Few-shot Steerable Alignment: Adapting Rewards and LLM Policies with Neural Processes [50.544186914115045]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly embedded in everyday applications.<n> Ensuring their alignment with the diverse preferences of individual users has become a critical challenge.<n>We present a novel framework for few-shot steerable alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-18T16:14:59Z)
• Scalable Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning with Fairness Guarantees using Lorenz Dominance [43.44913206006581]
  Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning (MORL) aims to learn a set of policies that optimize trade-offs between multiple, often conflicting objectives.<n>This paper introduces a principled algorithm that incorporates fairness into MORL while improving scalability to many-objective problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-27T10:16:25Z)
• Learning Reward and Policy Jointly from Demonstration and Preference Improves Alignment [58.049113055986375]
  We develop a single stage approach named Alignment with Integrated Human Feedback (AIHF) to train reward models and the policy.<n>The proposed approach admits a suite of efficient algorithms, which can easily reduce to, and leverage, popular alignment algorithms.<n>We demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed solutions with extensive experiments involving alignment problems in LLMs and robotic control problems in MuJoCo.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-11T01:20:53Z)
• Beyond One-Preference-Fits-All Alignment: Multi-Objective Direct Preference Optimization [76.09576643028362]
  We present Multi-Objective Direct Preference Optimization (MODPO) for multiple alignment objectives. MODPO folds language modeling directly into reward modeling, training language models as implicit collective reward models. It theoretically yields the same optimal solutions as MORLHF but is practically more stable and efficient.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-05T17:35:26Z)
• Generative multitask learning mitigates target-causing confounding [61.21582323566118]
  We propose a simple and scalable approach to causal representation learning for multitask learning. The improvement comes from mitigating unobserved confounders that cause the targets, but not the input. Our results on the Attributes of People and Taskonomy datasets reflect the conceptual improvement in robustness to prior probability shift.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-08T20:42:14Z)
• MORAL: Aligning AI with Human Norms through Multi-Objective Reinforced Active Learning [14.06682547001011]
  State-of-the art methods typically focus on learning a single reward model. We propose Multi-Objective Reinforced Active Learning (MORAL), a novel method for combining diverse demonstrations of social norms. Our approach is able to interactively tune a deep RL agent towards a variety of preferences, while eliminating the need for computing multiple policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-30T19:21:03Z)
• A Distributional View on Multi-Objective Policy Optimization [24.690800846837273]
  We propose an algorithm for multi-objective reinforcement learning that enables setting desired preferences for objectives in a scale-invariant way. We show that setting different preferences in our framework allows us to trace out the space of nondominated solutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-15T13:02:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.