Estimation of Confidence Bounds in Binary Classification using Wilson Score Kernel Density Estimation
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.20947v1
- Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2026 14:31:28 GMT
- Title: Estimation of Confidence Bounds in Binary Classification using Wilson Score Kernel Density Estimation
- Authors: Thorbjørn Mosekjær Iversen, Zebin Duan, Frederik Hagelskjær,
- Abstract summary: We present Wilson Score Kernel Density Classification, which is a novel kernel-based method for estimating confidence bounds in binary classification.<n>Our proposed method shows similar performance to Gaussian Process Classification, but at a lower computational complexity.
- Score: 3.16573957601374
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: The performance and ease of use of deep learning-based binary classifiers have improved significantly in recent years. This has opened up the potential for automating critical inspection tasks, which have traditionally only been trusted to be done manually. However, the application of binary classifiers in critical operations depends on the estimation of reliable confidence bounds such that system performance can be ensured up to a given statistical significance. We present Wilson Score Kernel Density Classification, which is a novel kernel-based method for estimating confidence bounds in binary classification. The core of our method is the Wilson Score Kernel Density Estimator, which is a function estimator for estimating confidence bounds in Binomial experiments with conditionally varying success probabilities. Our method is evaluated in the context of selective classification on four different datasets, illustrating its use as a classification head of any feature extractor, including vision foundation models. Our proposed method shows similar performance to Gaussian Process Classification, but at a lower computational complexity.
Related papers
- Binary Classification with Confidence Difference [100.08818204756093]
This paper delves into a novel weakly supervised binary classification problem called confidence-difference (ConfDiff) classification.
We propose a risk-consistent approach to tackle this problem and show that the estimation error bound the optimal convergence rate.
We also introduce a risk correction approach to mitigate overfitting problems, whose consistency and convergence rate are also proven.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-09T11:44:50Z) - The Lipschitz-Variance-Margin Tradeoff for Enhanced Randomized Smoothing [85.85160896547698]
Real-life applications of deep neural networks are hindered by their unsteady predictions when faced with noisy inputs and adversarial attacks.
We show how to design an efficient classifier with a certified radius by relying on noise injection into the inputs.
Our novel certification procedure allows us to use pre-trained models with randomized smoothing, effectively improving the current certification radius in a zero-shot manner.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-28T22:41:47Z) - Confidence Estimation Using Unlabeled Data [12.512654188295764]
We propose the first confidence estimation method for a semi-supervised setting, when most training labels are unavailable.
We use training consistency as a surrogate function and propose a consistency ranking loss for confidence estimation.
On both image classification and segmentation tasks, our method achieves state-of-the-art performances in confidence estimation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-19T20:11:30Z) - How to Fix a Broken Confidence Estimator: Evaluating Post-hoc Methods for Selective Classification with Deep Neural Networks [1.4502611532302039]
We show that a simple $p$-norm normalization of the logits, followed by taking the maximum logit as the confidence estimator, can lead to considerable gains in selective classification performance.
Our results are shown to be consistent under distribution shift.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-24T18:56:55Z) - Using Sum-Product Networks to Assess Uncertainty in Deep Active Learning [3.7507283158673212]
This paper proposes a new and very simple approach to computing uncertainty in deep active learning with a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN)
The main idea is to use the feature representation extracted by the CNN as data for training a Sum-Product Network (SPN)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-20T14:28:19Z) - Meta-Learning Hypothesis Spaces for Sequential Decision-making [79.73213540203389]
We propose to meta-learn a kernel from offline data (Meta-KeL)
Under mild conditions, we guarantee that our estimated RKHS yields valid confidence sets.
We also empirically evaluate the effectiveness of our approach on a Bayesian optimization task.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-01T17:46:51Z) - Confidence Estimation via Auxiliary Models [47.08749569008467]
We introduce a novel target criterion for model confidence, namely the true class probability ( TCP)
We show that TCP offers better properties for confidence estimation than standard maximum class probability (MCP)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-11T17:21:12Z) - Certifying Confidence via Randomized Smoothing [151.67113334248464]
Randomized smoothing has been shown to provide good certified-robustness guarantees for high-dimensional classification problems.
Most smoothing methods do not give us any information about the confidence with which the underlying classifier makes a prediction.
We propose a method to generate certified radii for the prediction confidence of the smoothed classifier.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-17T04:37:26Z) - Reachable Sets of Classifiers and Regression Models: (Non-)Robustness
Analysis and Robust Training [1.0878040851638]
We analyze and enhance robustness properties of both classifiers and regression models.
Specifically, we verify (non-)robustness, propose a robust training procedure, and show that our approach outperforms adversarial attacks.
Second, we provide techniques to distinguish between reliable and non-reliable predictions for unlabeled inputs, to quantify the influence of each feature on a prediction, and compute a feature ranking.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-28T10:58:06Z) - Binary Classification from Positive Data with Skewed Confidence [85.18941440826309]
Positive-confidence (Pconf) classification is a promising weakly-supervised learning method.
In practice, the confidence may be skewed by bias arising in an annotation process.
We introduce the parameterized model of the skewed confidence, and propose the method for selecting the hyper parameter.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-01-29T00:04:36Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.