ACAR: Adaptive Complexity Routing for Multi-Model Ensembles with Auditable Decision Traces
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.21231v1
- Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2026 23:27:17 GMT
- Title: ACAR: Adaptive Complexity Routing for Multi-Model Ensembles with Auditable Decision Traces
- Abstract summary: We present ACAR, a measurement framework for studying multi-model orchestration under auditable conditions.<n>ACAR uses self-consistency variance (sigma) computed from N=3 probe samples to route tasks across single-model, two-model, and three-model execution modes.<n>We evaluate ACAR on 1,510 tasks spanning four benchmarks, producing more than 7,550 auditable runs.
- Score: 3.151184728006369
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: We present ACAR (Adaptive Complexity and Attribution Routing), a measurement framework for studying multi-model orchestration under auditable conditions. ACAR uses self-consistency variance (sigma) computed from N=3 probe samples to route tasks across single-model, two-model, and three-model execution modes. The system is implemented on top of TEAMLLM, a deterministic execution substrate with immutable artifacts and complete decision traces. We evaluate ACAR on 1,510 tasks spanning four benchmarks: MathArena, Reasoning Gym, LiveCodeBench, and SuperGPQA, using Claude Sonnet 4, GPT-4o, and Gemini 2.0 Flash, producing more than 7,550 auditable runs. Results show that sigma-based routing achieves 55.6 percent accuracy, exceeding the two-model baseline of 54.4 percent while avoiding full ensembling on 54.2 percent of tasks. The routing mechanism is model-agnostic and requires no learned components. We also document negative results. First, retrieval augmentation reduced accuracy by 3.4 percentage points, as median retrieval similarity was only 0.167, demonstrating that experience injection without semantic alignment introduces noise rather than grounding. Second, when models agree on incorrect answers (sigma equals zero), no downstream ensemble can recover; this agreement-but-wrong failure mode is intrinsic to self-consistency and bounds achievable accuracy at approximately eight percentage points below full ensembling. Third, attribution estimates based on proxy signals such as response similarity and entropy showed weak correlation with ground-truth leave-one-out values, indicating that practical attribution requires explicit counterfactual computation. This work documents which assumptions fail in practice and provides falsifiable baselines for future research on routing, retrieval, and multi-model attribution.
Related papers
- RARE: Decoupling Representation Steering from Expert Routing in Mixture-of-Experts Language Models [13.298401993417611]
We introduce a router-agnostic representation engineering framework for MoE language models.<n>RARE projects arbitrary behavioral perturbations onto the null space of the router matrix, thereby removing router-visible components.<n>On harmfulness steering, RARE reaches an average attack success rate of 53.3% while retaining 67.8% MMLU accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-21T15:45:36Z) - Architecture-Dependent Causal Transfer of Activation States Across Large Language Models [51.56484100374058]
Internal language activation states can be transferred causally between different large language models.<n>Injecting projected activations into a target model during generation produces a statistically significant, preregistered causal effect.<n>We conclude that end-to-end activation-state transfer between LLMs, as currently implemented, is architecture-dependent rather than universal.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-17T09:53:27Z) - Modeling Normal Is All You Need: Joint Latent Clustering for Anomaly Detection in Multimodal Cyber-Physical Systems [47.027290803102666]
Normal behaviour is the union of many imbalanced, curved, thin-fringed operating regimes.<n>We model the normal law with a jointly learned latent representation plus explicit Gaussian-mixture mode clustering.<n>We evaluate under a deliberately fair protocol: raw point-wise metrics with no point adjustment, a trivial-detector difficulty split, prevalence-matched F1, and train-normal-only calibration.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-07T10:10:00Z) - Efficient Visual Pointing for Embodied AI:Agent-Driven Data Synthesis, Cross-Block Attention, and Iterative Correction [55.11480729304395]
We describe our PointArena 2026 solution, which achieves 77.2% overall accuracy and ranks second on the benchmark.<n>The ap proach targets three failure modes. First, agent-driven syn thesis builds large semantic and anchor-relative candidate pools.<n>Second, a determinis tic steerable-data pipeline creates a verified 10,000-sample main set, plus reserve samples, using masks, templates, and path verification.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-29T06:39:03Z) - FineVerify: Scaling Test-Time Compute with Fine-Grained Self-Verification for Agentic Search [88.16262636915975]
FineVerify is a fine-grained self-verification framework for agentic search.<n>It decomposes each question into checkable sub-questions, verifies sampled candidates, and selects the candidate with the highest aggregated score.<n>FineVerify consistently outperforms standard scaling baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-30T10:21:20Z) - Distributional Energy-Based Models for Uncertainty-Aware Structured LLM Reasoning [40.342912574072024]
Large Language Models produce structured outputs such as travel plans or code solutions.<n>Individual reasoning steps may appear correct while the output as a whole violates budgets, fails test cases, or contradicts earlier deductions.<n>We propose a learned quality scorer with deterministic analytical constraint penalties for verifying structured LLM outputs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-15T17:08:27Z) - The Verification Tax: Fundamental Limits of AI Auditing in the Rare-Error Regime [0.0]
Most cited calibration result in deep learning -- post-temperature-scaling ECE of 0.012 on CIFAR-100 -- is below the statistical noise floor.<n>We prove this is not a failure of the experiment but a law: the minimax rate for estimating calibration error with model error rate epsilon is Theta((Lepsilon/m)2/3), and no estimator can beat it.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-14T16:48:24Z) - OrgForge-IT: A Verifiable Synthetic Benchmark for LLM-Based Insider Threat Detection [0.0]
We present a verifiable synthetic benchmark in which a deterministic simulation engine maintains ground truth and language models generate only surface prose.<n>The corpus spans 51 simulated days, 2,904 telemetry records at a 96.4% noise rate, and four detection scenarios designed to defeat single-surface and single-day triage strategies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-23T19:03:53Z) - Deterministic Fuzzy Triage for Legal Compliance Classification and Evidence Retrieval [0.0]
Legal teams increasingly use machine learning to triage large volumes of contractual evidence.<n>Many models are opaque, non-deterministic, and difficult to align with frameworks such as HIPAA or NERC-CIP.<n>We study a simple, reproducible alternative based on deterministic dual encoders and transparent fuzzy triage bands.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-08T00:31:34Z) - Chain of Simulation: A Dual-Mode Reasoning Framework for Large Language Models with Dynamic Problem Routing [0.0]
Chain of Simulation (CoS) is a novel dual-mode reasoning framework that dynamically routes problems to specialized reasoning strategies.<n>CoS employs three distinct reasoning modes: computational flow with self-consistency for mathematical problems, symbolic state tracking with representations for spatial reasoning, and hybrid fact-extraction for multi-hop inference.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-02T21:44:01Z) - EdgeJury: Cross-Reviewed Small-Model Ensembles for Truthful Question Answering on Serverless Edge Inference [0.0]
We present EdgeJury, a lightweight ensemble framework that improves truthfulness and robustness.<n>On TruthfulQA (MC1), EdgeJury achieves 76.2% accuracy.<n>On a 200-question adversarial EdgeCases set, EdgeJury yields +48.2% relative gains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-29T14:48:40Z) - Towards a Science of Scaling Agent Systems [79.64446272302287]
We formalize a definition for agent evaluation and characterize scaling laws as the interplay between agent quantity, coordination structure, modelic, and task properties.<n>We derive a predictive model using coordination metrics, that cross-validated R2=0, enabling prediction on unseen task domains.<n>We identify three effects: (1) a tool-coordination trade-off: under fixed computational budgets, tool-heavy tasks suffer disproportionately from multi-agent overhead, and (2) a capability saturation: coordination yields diminishing or negative returns once single-agent baselines exceed 45%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-09T06:52:21Z) - Eigen-1: Adaptive Multi-Agent Refinement with Monitor-Based RAG for Scientific Reasoning [53.45095336430027]
We develop a unified framework that combines implicit retrieval and structured collaboration.<n>On Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) Bio/Chem Gold, our framework achieves 48.3% accuracy.<n>Results on SuperGPQA and TRQA confirm robustness across domains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-25T14:05:55Z) - Abduct, Act, Predict: Scaffolding Causal Inference for Automated Failure Attribution in Multi-Agent Systems [20.846301581161978]
Failure attribution in multi-agent systems is a critical yet unsolved challenge.<n>Current methods treat this as a pattern recognition task over long conversation logs.<n>A2P Scaffolding transforms failure attribution from pattern recognition into a structured causal inference task.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-12T16:51:15Z) - Adaptive Monitoring and Real-World Evaluation of Agentic AI Systems [3.215065407261898]
Multi-agent systems that combine large language models with external tools are rapidly transitioning from research laboratories into high-stakes domains.<n>This "Advanced" sequel fills that gap by providing an algorithmic instantiation or empirical evidence.<n>AMDM cuts anomaly-detection latency from 12.3 s to 5.6 s on simulated goal drift and reduces false-positive rates from 4.5% to 0.9%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-28T15:52:49Z) - Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors Mitigation [63.180725016463974]
Cross-modal retrieval relies on well-matched large-scale datasets that are laborious in practice.
We introduce a novel noisy correspondence learning framework, namely textbfSelf-textbfReinforcing textbfErrors textbfMitigation (SREM)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-27T09:03:43Z) - Uncertainty Guided Adaptive Warping for Robust and Efficient Stereo
Matching [77.133400999703]
Correlation based stereo matching has achieved outstanding performance.
Current methods with a fixed model do not work uniformly well across various datasets.
This paper proposes a new perspective to dynamically calculate correlation for robust stereo matching.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-26T09:47:37Z) - Composed Image Retrieval with Text Feedback via Multi-grained
Uncertainty Regularization [73.04187954213471]
We introduce a unified learning approach to simultaneously modeling the coarse- and fine-grained retrieval.
The proposed method has achieved +4.03%, +3.38%, and +2.40% Recall@50 accuracy over a strong baseline.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-14T14:25:40Z) - Consistent-Teacher: Towards Reducing Inconsistent Pseudo-targets in
Semi-supervised Object Detection [28.40887130075552]
Pseudo-targets undermine the training of an accurate detector.
It injects noise into the student's training, leading to severe overfitting problems.
We propose a systematic solution, termed ConsistentTeacher, to reduce the inconsistency.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-04T10:21:02Z) - Disentangle Your Dense Object Detector [82.22771433419727]
Deep learning-based dense object detectors have achieved great success in the past few years and have been applied to numerous multimedia applications such as video understanding.
However, the current training pipeline for dense detectors is compromised to lots of conjunctions that may not hold.
We propose Disentangled Dense Object Detector (DDOD), in which simple and effective disentanglement mechanisms are designed and integrated into the current state-of-the-art detectors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-07T00:52:16Z) - EqCo: Equivalent Rules for Self-supervised Contrastive Learning [81.45848885547754]
We propose a method to make self-supervised learning irrelevant to the number of negative samples in InfoNCE-based contrastive learning frameworks.
Inspired by the InfoMax principle, we point that the margin term in contrastive loss needs to be adaptively scaled according to the number of negative pairs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-05T11:39:04Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.