Invariant Transformation and Resampling based Epistemic-Uncertainty Reduction

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.23315v1
• Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2026 18:22:40 GMT
• Title: Invariant Transformation and Resampling based Epistemic-Uncertainty Reduction
• Authors: Sha Hu,
• Abstract summary: We propose a "resampling" based inferencing that applies to a trained AI model with multiple transformed versions of an input.<n>This approach has the potential to improve inference accuracy and offers a strategy for balancing model size and performance.
• Score: 2.132096006921048
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: An artificial intelligence (AI) model can be viewed as a function that maps inputs to outputs in high-dimensional spaces. Once designed and well trained, the AI model is applied for inference. However, even optimized AI models can produce inference errors due to aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties. Interestingly, we observed that when inferring multiple samples based on invariant transformations of an input, inference errors can show partial independences due to epistemic uncertainty. Leveraging this insight, we propose a "resampling" based inferencing that applies to a trained AI model with multiple transformed versions of an input, and aggregates inference outputs to a more accurate result. This approach has the potential to improve inference accuracy and offers a strategy for balancing model size and performance.

Related papers

• Uncertainty-aware data assimilation through variational inference [1.0214749455979089]
  We propose a variational inference-based extension to the deterministic machine learning approach.<n>We show that our new model enables to obtain nearly perfectly calibrated predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-20T07:54:35Z)
• Unveiling the Statistical Foundations of Chain-of-Thought Prompting Methods [59.779795063072655]
  Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting and its variants have gained popularity as effective methods for solving multi-step reasoning problems. We analyze CoT prompting from a statistical estimation perspective, providing a comprehensive characterization of its sample complexity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-25T04:07:18Z)
• Scaling and renormalization in high-dimensional regression [72.59731158970894]
  We present a unifying perspective on recent results on ridge regression.<n>We use the basic tools of random matrix theory and free probability, aimed at readers with backgrounds in physics and deep learning.<n>Our results extend and provide a unifying perspective on earlier models of scaling laws.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-01T15:59:00Z)
• Ensemble Kalman Filtering Meets Gaussian Process SSM for Non-Mean-Field and Online Inference [47.460898983429374]
  We introduce an ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) into the non-mean-field (NMF) variational inference framework to approximate the posterior distribution of the latent states. This novel marriage between EnKF and GPSSM not only eliminates the need for extensive parameterization in learning variational distributions, but also enables an interpretable, closed-form approximation of the evidence lower bound (ELBO) We demonstrate that the resulting EnKF-aided online algorithm embodies a principled objective function by ensuring data-fitting accuracy while incorporating model regularizations to mitigate overfitting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-10T15:22:30Z)
• Diffusion models for probabilistic programming [56.47577824219207]
  Diffusion Model Variational Inference (DMVI) is a novel method for automated approximate inference in probabilistic programming languages (PPLs) DMVI is easy to implement, allows hassle-free inference in PPLs without the drawbacks of, e.g., variational inference using normalizing flows, and does not make any constraints on the underlying neural network model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-01T12:17:05Z)
• Natural Evolution Strategies as a Black Box Estimator for Stochastic Variational Inference [0.0]
  VAE allows unbiased and low variance estimation, restricting the types of models that can be created. An alternative gradient estimator based on natural evolution strategies is proposed. This estimator does not make assumptions about the kind of distributions used, allowing for the creation of models that would otherwise not have been possible under the VAE framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-15T21:43:11Z)
• Correcting Model Bias with Sparse Implicit Processes [0.9187159782788579]
  We show that Sparse Implicit Processes (SIP) is capable of correcting model bias when the data generating mechanism differs strongly from the one implied by the model. We use synthetic datasets to show that SIP is capable of providing predictive distributions that reflect the data better than the exact predictions of the initial, but wrongly assumed model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-21T18:00:01Z)
• PAC Generalization via Invariant Representations [41.02828564338047]
  We consider the notion of $epsilon$-approximate invariance in a finite sample setting. Inspired by PAC learning, we obtain finite-sample out-of-distribution generalization guarantees. Our results show bounds that do not scale in ambient dimension when intervention sites are restricted to lie in a constant size subset of in-degree bounded nodes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-30T15:50:14Z)
• Regularizing Variational Autoencoder with Diversity and Uncertainty Awareness [61.827054365139645]
  Variational Autoencoder (VAE) approximates the posterior of latent variables based on amortized variational inference. We propose an alternative model, DU-VAE, for learning a more Diverse and less Uncertain latent space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-24T07:58:13Z)
• Reducing the Amortization Gap in Variational Autoencoders: A Bayesian Random Function Approach [38.45568741734893]
  Inference in our GP model is done by a single feed forward pass through the network, significantly faster than semi-amortized methods. We show that our approach attains higher test data likelihood than the state-of-the-arts on several benchmark datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-05T13:01:12Z)
• Probabilistic Circuits for Variational Inference in Discrete Graphical Models [101.28528515775842]
  Inference in discrete graphical models with variational methods is difficult. Many sampling-based methods have been proposed for estimating Evidence Lower Bound (ELBO) We propose a new approach that leverages the tractability of probabilistic circuit models, such as Sum Product Networks (SPN) We show that selective-SPNs are suitable as an expressive variational distribution, and prove that when the log-density of the target model is aweighted the corresponding ELBO can be computed analytically.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-22T05:04:38Z)
• Decision-Making with Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes [71.44735417472043]
  We show that a posterior approximation distinct from the variational distribution should be used for making decisions. Motivated by these theoretical results, we propose learning several approximate proposals for the best model. In addition to toy examples, we present a full-fledged case study of single-cell RNA sequencing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-17T19:23:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.