When AI Levels the Playing Field: Skill Homogenization, Asset Concentration, and Two Regimes of Inequality
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.05565v2
- Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2026 15:29:42 GMT
- Title: When AI Levels the Playing Field: Skill Homogenization, Asset Concentration, and Two Regimes of Inequality
- Abstract summary: Generative AI compresses within-task skill differences while shifting economic value toward concentrated complementary assets.<n>We formalize this tension in a task-based model with endogenous education, employer screening, and heterogeneous firms.<n>The model yields two regimes whose boundary depends on AI's technology structure.
- Score: 0.7016842616745783
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Generative AI compresses within-task skill differences while shifting economic value toward concentrated complementary assets, creating an apparent paradox: the technology that equalizes individual performance may widen aggregate inequality. We formalize this tension in a task-based model with endogenous education, employer screening, and heterogeneous firms. The model yields two regimes whose boundary depends on AI's technology structure (proprietary vs. commodity) and labor market institutions (rent-sharing elasticity, asset concentration). A scenario analysis via Method of Simulated Moments, matching six empirical targets, disciplines the model's quantitative magnitudes; a sensitivity decomposition reveals that the five non-$Δ$Gini moments identify mechanism rates but not the aggregate sign, which at the calibrated parameters is pinned by $m_6$ and $ξ$, while AI's technology structure ($η_1$ vs. $η_0$) independently crosses the boundary. The contribution is the mechanism -- not a verdict on the sign. Occupation-level regressions using BLS OEWS data (2019--2023) illustrate why such data cannot test the model's task-level predictions. The predictions are testable with within-occupation, within-task panel data that do not yet exist at scale.
Related papers
- Civilizational Metamaterials: Engineering Coordination Under Capability Gradients and Structural Turbulence [0.0]
We argue that governance must transition from a normative discipline to an engineering discipline.<n>We develop a formal framework, inspired by the physics of metamaterials, to make this transition quantitative and testable.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-29T18:10:00Z) - ComplexMCP: Evaluation of LLM Agents in Dynamic, Interdependent, and Large-Scale Tool Sandbox [61.862814740220806]
$textbfComplexMCP$ is a benchmark designed to evaluate agents in rigorous conditions.<n>Built on the Model Context Protocol (MCP), $textbfComplexMCP$ provides over 300 meticulously tested tools.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-11T16:20:51Z) - Escaping the Diversity Trap in Robotic Manipulation via Anchor-Centric Adaptation [50.23374353859762]
"Maximizing coverage" by collecting diverse, single-shot demonstrations can be self-defeating due to non-vanishing estimation noise.<n>We formalize this phenomenon as a Coverage--Density Trade-off.<n>We propose Anchor-Centric Adaptation (ACA), a two-stage framework that first stabilizes a policy skeleton through repeated demonstrations at core anchors, then expands coverage to high-risk boundaries via teacher-forced error mining and constrained residual updates.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-08T07:35:24Z) - Tight Convergence Rates for Online Distributed Linear Estimation with Adversarial Measurements [66.94250413799232]
We study mean estimation of a random vector $X$ in a distributed parameter-server-worker setup.<n>Key challenges are adversarial measurements and asynchrony.<n>Results provide a unified finite-time characterization of robustness, identifiability, and statistical efficiency in distributed linear estimation with adversarial workers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-07T11:45:55Z) - Bounded by Risk, Not Capability: Quantifying AI Occupational Substitution Rates via a Tech-Risk Dual-Factor Model [0.0]
We argue occupations are not eradicated instantaneously, but gradually encroached upon via atomic actions.<n>By deconstructing 923 occupations into 2,087 Detailed Work Activities (DWAs), we utilize a multi-agent LLM ensemble to score both technical feasibility and business risk.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-06T06:21:08Z) - The Novelty Bottleneck: A Framework for Understanding Human Effort Scaling in AI-Assisted Work [4.726153739634646]
We propose a model of human-AI collaboration that isolates a mechanism we call the novelty bottleneck.<n>The model assumes that tasks decompose into atomic decisions, a fraction $$ of which are "novel"<n>Our contribution is not a proof that human effort must scale linearly, but a framework that identifies the novelty fraction as the key parameter governing AI-assisted productivity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-28T22:50:13Z) - A Sustainable AI Economy Needs Data Deals That Work for Generators [56.949279542190084]
We argue that the machine learning value chain is structurally unsustainable due to an economic data processing inequality.<n>We analyze 73 public data deals and show that the majority of value accrues to aggregators.<n>We propose an Equitable Data-Value Exchange Framework to enable a minimal market that benefits all participants.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-15T01:05:48Z) - How AI Agents Follow the Herd of AI? Network Effects, History, and Machine Optimism [7.1683021355290295]
This study investigates how AI agents navigate network-effect games, where individual payoffs depend on peer participatio--a context underexplored in multi-agent systems.<n>We introduce a novel workflow design using large language model (LLM)-based agents in repeated decision-making scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-12T12:14:48Z) - Idempotent Equilibrium Analysis of Hybrid Workflow Allocation: A Mathematical Schema for Future Work [0.0]
Large-scale AI systems are reshaping how work is divided between people and machines.<n>We formalise this reallocation as an iterated task-delegation map and show that the process converges to a stable idempotent equilibrium.<n>We argue that policies which promote "centaur" human-AI teaming can steer the economy toward the welfare-maximising fixed point.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-02T11:28:34Z) - Shifting AI Efficiency From Model-Centric to Data-Centric Compression [67.45087283924732]
We argue that the focus of research for AI is shifting from model-centric compression to data-centric compression.<n>Data-centric compression improves AI efficiency by directly compressing the volume of data processed during model training or inference.<n>Our work aims to provide a novel perspective on AI efficiency, synthesize existing efforts, and catalyze innovation to address the challenges posed by ever-increasing context lengths.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-25T13:51:17Z) - FLARE: Robot Learning with Implicit World Modeling [87.81846091038676]
$textbfFLARE$ integrates predictive latent world modeling into robot policy learning.<n>$textbfFLARE$ achieves state-of-the-art performance, outperforming prior policy learning baselines by up to 26%.<n>Our results establish $textbfFLARE$ as a general and scalable approach for combining implicit world modeling with high-frequency robotic control.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-21T15:33:27Z) - Will Neural Scaling Laws Activate Jevons' Paradox in AI Labor Markets? A Time-Varying Elasticity of Substitution (VES) Analysis [0.0]
We analyze whether neural scaling laws in artificial intelligence will activate Jevons' Paradox in labor markets.<n>We establish analytical conditions under which AI systems transition from complementing to substituting for human labor.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-04T16:55:30Z) - Delta-AI: Local objectives for amortized inference in sparse graphical models [64.5938437823851]
We present a new algorithm for amortized inference in sparse probabilistic graphical models (PGMs)
Our approach is based on the observation that when the sampling of variables in a PGM is seen as a sequence of actions taken by an agent, sparsity of the PGM enables local credit assignment in the agent's policy learning objective.
We illustrate $Delta$-AI's effectiveness for sampling from synthetic PGMs and training latent variable models with sparse factor structure.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-03T20:37:03Z) - Ecosystem-level Analysis of Deployed Machine Learning Reveals Homogeneous Outcomes [72.13373216644021]
We study the societal impact of machine learning by considering the collection of models that are deployed in a given context.
We find deployed machine learning is prone to systemic failure, meaning some users are exclusively misclassified by all models available.
These examples demonstrate ecosystem-level analysis has unique strengths for characterizing the societal impact of machine learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-12T01:11:52Z) - Data quality dimensions for fair AI [0.0]
We consider the problem of bias in AI systems from the point of view of data quality dimensions.<n>We highlight the limited model construction of bias mitigation tools based on accuracy strategy.<n>We propose to reconsider the fairness of the classification task in terms of completeness, consistency, timeliness and reliability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-11T16:48:58Z) - Unintended Selection: Persistent Qualification Rate Disparities and
Interventions [6.006936459950188]
We study the dynamics of group-level disparities in machine learning.
In particular, we desire models that do not suppose inherent differences between artificial groups of people.
We show that differences in qualification rates between subpopulations can persist indefinitely for a set of non-trivial equilibrium states.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-01T18:53:54Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.