Summing to Uncertainty: On the Necessity of Additivity in Deriving the Born Rule

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.06211v1
• Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2026 12:28:32 GMT
• Title: Summing to Uncertainty: On the Necessity of Additivity in Deriving the Born Rule
• Abstract summary: We prove the necessity and indispensability of the additivity assumption in the derivation of the Born rule.<n>We analyze the crucial role of the additivity assumption in five important existing derivations of the Born rule.
• Score: 0.9983624159392209
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The emergence of intrinsic probability has long been one of the most important and puzzling problems in quantum mechanics, and the law most directly related to this problem is the Born rule. For a century, there have been many attempts to derive the Born rule as a theorem rather than postulating it. However, existing derivations of the Born rule are each based on different frameworks and have attracted different criticisms. The assumptions from which they start are also highly divergent, and the connections between them have not been sufficiently studied. These possible connections are very likely to be the key to answering questions about the origin of probability in quantum mechanics. This paper focuses on proving the necessity and indispensability of the additivity assumption in the derivation of the Born rule. This supports the view that the Born rule cannot be derived solely from other non-probabilistic quantum or additional postulates. We first prove that additivity cannot be derived from two other commonly used non-probabilistic additional assumptions, non-contextuality and normalization. Then we analyze the crucial role of the additivity assumption in five important existing derivations of the Born rule. These include Gleason's Theorem, Busch's extension of Gleason's Theorem, the Deutsch-Wallace Theorem, Zurek's envariance proof, and the Finkelstein-Hartle Theorem. We show that these derivations either depend heavily on the additivity assumption or lead to obvious loopholes due to the lack of additivity. We also point out some problems arised from the lack of a non-contextuality assumption. Our results provide a novel insight into the important role of additivity assumption in quantum measurement, as well as into the origin of probability in quantum mechanics.

Related papers

• Generalised quantum Stein's lemma more robust than ever [40.77349008361407]
  generalised quantum Stein's lemma is a key result in quantum hypothesis testing.<n>We establish a version of generalised quantum Stein's lemma that is conceptually much simpler and general.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-15T15:19:27Z)
• Aumann's theorem beyond ontology: quantum, postquantum, and indefinite causal order [0.0]
  We derive an operational version of Aumann's agreement theorem without assuming an objective state of the world.<n>This allows us to establish the theorem's validity in quantum theory and even in situations with indefinite causal order or involving hypothetical postquantum phenomena.<n>We comment on seemingly contradictory results in the literature and point to the one place where the theorem might fail: Wigner's friend-type situations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-24T18:00:00Z)
• Connecting classical finite exchangeability to quantum theory [45.76759085727843]
  Exchangeability is a fundamental concept in probability theory and statistics.<n>It allows to model situations where the order of observations does not matter.<n>It is well known that both theorems do not hold for finitely exchangeable sequences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-06T17:15:19Z)
• A Measure-Theoretic Axiomatisation of Causality [55.6970314129444]
  We argue in favour of taking Kolmogorov's measure-theoretic axiomatisation of probability as the starting point towards an axiomatisation of causality. Our proposed framework is rigorously grounded in measure theory, but it also sheds light on long-standing limitations of existing frameworks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-19T13:15:48Z)
• The Born Rule -- Axiom or Result? [0.0]
  The Born rule is part of the collapse axiom in the standard version of quantum theory. Our presentation is suitable for advanced undergraduates or graduate students who have taken a standard course in quantum theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-04T04:08:47Z)
• On a gap in the proof of the generalised quantum Stein's lemma and its consequences for the reversibility of quantum resources [49.38651060124439]
  We show that the proof of the generalised quantum Stein's lemma is not correct due to a gap in the argument leading to Lemma III.9.<n>This puts into question a number of established results in the literature, in particular the reversibility of quantum entanglement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-05T17:46:05Z)
• Why we should interpret density matrices as moment matrices: the case of (in)distinguishable particles and the emergence of classical reality [69.62715388742298]
  We introduce a formulation of quantum theory (QT) as a general probabilistic theory but expressed via quasi-expectation operators (QEOs) We will show that QT for both distinguishable and indistinguishable particles can be formulated in this way. We will show that finitely exchangeable probabilities for a classical dice are as weird as QT.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-08T14:47:39Z)
• Revisiting Born's rule through Uhlhorn's and Gleason's theorems [0.0]
  We present an argument to obtain (or rather infer) Born's rule, based on a simple set of axioms named "Contexts, Systems and Modalities" Here we show that an essential one among these hypotheses - the need of unitary transforms to relate different contexts - can be removed and is better seen as a necessary consequence of Uhlhorn's theorem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-21T07:54:45Z)
• Born's rule as a quantum extension of Bayesian coherence [0.0]
  We make a conjectured representation of the Born rule which holds true if symmetric informationally complete POVMs (or SICs) exist for every finite dimensional Hilbert space. We prove that an agent who thinks they are gambling on the outcomes of measurements on a sufficiently quantum-like system, but refuses to use this form of the Born rule when placing their bets is vulnerable to a Dutch book.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-28T18:22:42Z)
• A Weaker Faithfulness Assumption based on Triple Interactions [89.59955143854556]
  We propose a weaker assumption that we call $2$-adjacency faithfulness. We propose a sound orientation rule for causal discovery that applies under weaker assumptions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-27T13:04:08Z)
• Everettian probabilities, the Deutsch-Wallace theorem and the Principal Principle [0.0]
  Itamar Pitowsky's thinking about probability in quantum theory from 1994 to 2008 is discussed. The status of David Lewis' influential Principal Principle is critically examined. The Deutsch-Wallace (DW) theorem in quantum mechanics is critically examined.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-22T10:43:37Z)
• Born's Rule from Quantum Frequentism [0.0]
  Quantum theory has evolved from a set of provisional rules to an indispensable framework.<n>Born's probability postulate remains at odds with the theory's unitary character.<n>We prove that purely unitary evolution can co-exist with Born's rule under more relaxed conditions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2019-03-28T15:01:41Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.