Aumann's theorem beyond ontology: quantum, postquantum, and indefinite causal order

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23595v1
• Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 18:00:00 GMT
• Title: Aumann's theorem beyond ontology: quantum, postquantum, and indefinite causal order
• Abstract summary: We derive an operational version of Aumann's agreement theorem without assuming an objective state of the world.<n>This allows us to establish the theorem's validity in quantum theory and even in situations with indefinite causal order or involving hypothetical postquantum phenomena.<n>We comment on seemingly contradictory results in the literature and point to the one place where the theorem might fail: Wigner's friend-type situations.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Agreement theorems are no-go results about rational disagreement: if two agents start from a common prior and their posterior beliefs are common knowledge, they cannot assign different probabilities to the same event. Standard treatments of the result have the agents reason about an underlying state of the world, which has lead some to ask whether the result can extend to quantum or postquantum phenomena, where such a description may no longer be appropriate. We derive an operational version of Aumann's agreement theorem without assuming an objective state of the world and instead focusing only on what is observed. This allows us to establish the theorem's validity in quantum theory and even in situations with indefinite causal order or involving hypothetical postquantum phenomena. We comment on seemingly contradictory results in the literature and point to the one place where the theorem might fail: Wigner's friend-type situations.

Related papers

• The Quantum Agreement Theorem [0.0]
  We define the modality of "common certainty" through a hierarchy of certainty operators acting on each agent's Hilbert space.<n>In commuting cases, common certainty leads to equality of the agents' conditional probabilities, recovering a QM analog of the classical theorem.<n>We establish an impossibility result stating that QM forbids a scenario where one agent is certain that a property of interest occurs, and is also certain that the other agent is certain that the property does not occur.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-26T10:40:11Z)
• Minimal operational theories: classical theories with quantum features [41.94295877935867]
  We introduce a class of probabilistic theories, where system dynamics are constrained to the minimal set of operations.<n>Specifically, the allowed instruments are limited to those derived from compositions of preparations, measurements, swap transformations, and conditional tests.<n>We demonstrate that minimal theories with conditioning and a spanning set of non-separable states satisfy two quantum no-go theorems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-02T16:24:09Z)
• What Does '(Non)-Absoluteness of Observed Events' Mean? [0.0]
  We argue that the Wigner's friend paradox, the theorem of Bong et al and the theorem of Lawrence et al are all best understood as demonstrating that if quantum mechanics is universal. We also argue that these theorems taken together suggest interesting possibilities for a different kind of relational approach in which dynamical states are relativized whilst observed events are absolute.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-06T17:13:31Z)
• Logic meets Wigner's Friend (and their Friends) [49.1574468325115]
  We take a fresh look at Wigner's Friend thought-experiment and some of its more recent variants and extensions. We discuss various solutions proposed in the literature, focusing on a few questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-04T13:31:56Z)
• Connecting classical finite exchangeability to quantum theory [45.76759085727843]
  Exchangeability is a fundamental concept in probability theory and statistics.<n>It allows to model situations where the order of observations does not matter.<n>It is well known that both theorems do not hold for finitely exchangeable sequences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-06T17:15:19Z)
• No-local-broadcasting theorem for non-signalling behaviours and assemblages [0.0]
  The no-broadcasting theorem is a fundamental result in quantum information theory.<n>We prove Joshi, Grudka, and Horodecki$otimes 4$ conjectured that one cannot locally broadcast nonlocal behaviours.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-25T19:08:28Z)
• A possibilistic no-go theorem on the Wigner's friend paradox [0.0]
  We present a probability-free version of the Local Friendliness theorem. It builds upon Hardy's no-go theorem for local hidden variables.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-24T17:31:54Z)
• Incompatibility of observables, channels and instruments in information theories [68.8204255655161]
  We study the notion of compatibility for tests of an operational probabilistic theory. We show that a theory admits of incompatible tests if and only if some information cannot be extracted without disturbance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-17T08:44:29Z)
• Generalising Aumann's Agreement Theorem [0.0]
  Aumann's celebrated theorem says that a group of agents who once shared a common prior probability distribution cannot assign different posteriors to a given proposition. We argue that agreeing to disagree is impossible in quantum theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-04T14:37:50Z)
• Observers of quantum systems cannot agree to disagree [55.41644538483948]
  We ask whether agreement between observers can serve as a physical principle that must hold for any theory of the world. We construct examples of (postquantum) no-signaling boxes where observers can agree to disagree.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-17T19:00:04Z)
• Bell's theorem for trajectories [62.997667081978825]
  A trajectory is not an outcome of a quantum measurement, in the sense that there is no observable associated with it. We show how to overcome this problem by considering a special case of our generic inequality that can be experimentally tested point-by-point in time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-03T01:40:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.