A Realistic Framework for Quantum Sensing under Finite Resources
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.08306v1
- Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2026 12:28:51 GMT
- Title: A Realistic Framework for Quantum Sensing under Finite Resources
- Abstract summary: Quantum-enhanced sensing is commonly benchmarked using the quantum Fisher information (QFI)<n>Here we establish a realistic end-to-end framework for quantum sensing under finite resources.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Quantum-enhanced sensing is commonly benchmarked using the quantum Fisher information (QFI), often interpreted as a direct indicator of achievable precision. However, this quantity acquires operational meaning only within a fully specified inference framework that consistently incorporates state preparation, measurement design, resource accounting, estimator construction, prior information, and finite data effects. Here we establish a realistic end-to-end framework for quantum sensing under finite resources and identify general principles required for operationally meaningful performance assessment. A central conceptual point is that the relevant unit of estimation is not a single detection event but the inference data set required to construct a consistent estimator. We apply this approach to several paradigmatic sensing strategies frequently cited in the literature. Revisiting phase estimation with NOON states within a Bayesian framework under equal total photon resources, we explicitly construct optimal estimators and show that such schemes offer no performance advantage over repeated classical interferometry for global phase estimation with finite prior width. The apparent Heisenberg-like scaling arises predominantly from prior constraints rather than from information gained in the measurement, which is operationally negligible in the resource-normalized sense considered here. We further analyse Holland-Burnett interferometry and homodyne detection with squeezed states, demonstrating how estimator construction and repetition number determine the attainable precision and when QFI provides a reliable diagnostic. Our results clarify the conditions under which nonclassical resources lead to genuine metrological advantages and provide a practical methodology for designing and evaluating quantum sensing protocols under realistic experimental constraints.
Related papers
- Measurement incompatibility in Bayesian multiparameter quantum estimation [0.0]
We analyse the role of measurement incompatibility and establish its quantitative effect on attainable precision.<n>We prove that, as in the many-copy regime of local estimation theory, incompatibility can at most double the minimum loss.<n>Results illustrate through a range of applications, including discrete quantum phase imaging, phase and dephasing estimation, and qubit sensing.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-20T18:51:18Z) - Operator-aware shadow importance sampling for accurate fidelity estimation [8.212934913387384]
Grouping-based DFE achieves strong accuracy for small systems but suffers from exponential scaling.<n>Our algorithm improves upon the grouping-based algorithms for Haar-random states.<n>For structured states such as the GHZ and W states, our algorithm also eliminates the exponential memory requirements of previous grouping-based methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-03T14:09:31Z) - The Cramér-Rao approach and global quantum estimation of bosonic states [52.47029505708008]
It is unclear whether the Cram'er-Rao approach is applicable for global estimation instead of local estimation.<n>We find situations where the Cram'er-Rao approach does and does not work for quantum state estimation problems involving a family of bosonic states in a non-IID setting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-18T09:49:18Z) - Relative-belief inference in quantum information theory [0.0]
We show that the relative belief procedure chooses Hilbert spaces that are never smaller in dimension than those selected from optimizing a broad class of information criteria.
We apply the relative belief procedure to an important application: state reconstruction of imperfect quantum sources.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-05T14:59:58Z) - Benchmarking Bayesian quantum estimation [0.0]
This work focuses on the benchmarking of protocols implementing Bayesian estimations.
By comparing different figures of merits, evidence is provided in favor of using the median of the quadratic error in the estimations.
These results find natural applications to practical problems within the quantum estimation framework.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-26T14:29:31Z) - Score Matching-based Pseudolikelihood Estimation of Neural Marked
Spatio-Temporal Point Process with Uncertainty Quantification [59.81904428056924]
We introduce SMASH: a Score MAtching estimator for learning markedPs with uncertainty quantification.
Specifically, our framework adopts a normalization-free objective by estimating the pseudolikelihood of markedPs through score-matching.
The superior performance of our proposed framework is demonstrated through extensive experiments in both event prediction and uncertainty quantification.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-25T02:37:51Z) - Advancing Counterfactual Inference through Nonlinear Quantile Regression [77.28323341329461]
We propose a framework for efficient and effective counterfactual inference implemented with neural networks.
The proposed approach enhances the capacity to generalize estimated counterfactual outcomes to unseen data.
Empirical results conducted on multiple datasets offer compelling support for our theoretical assertions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-09T08:30:51Z) - Robust and efficient verification of graph states in blind
measurement-based quantum computation [52.70359447203418]
Blind quantum computation (BQC) is a secure quantum computation method that protects the privacy of clients.
It is crucial to verify whether the resource graph states are accurately prepared in the adversarial scenario.
Here, we propose a robust and efficient protocol for verifying arbitrary graph states with any prime local dimension.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-18T06:24:45Z) - Demonstration of machine-learning-enhanced Bayesian quantum state
estimation [0.0]
We experimentally realize an approach for defining custom prior distributions that are automatically tuned using machine learning.
We show that ML-defined prior distributions reduce net convergence times and provide a natural way to incorporate both implicit and explicit information directly into the prior distribution.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-15T18:41:15Z) - Validation Diagnostics for SBI algorithms based on Normalizing Flows [55.41644538483948]
This work proposes easy to interpret validation diagnostics for multi-dimensional conditional (posterior) density estimators based on NF.
It also offers theoretical guarantees based on results of local consistency.
This work should help the design of better specified models or drive the development of novel SBI-algorithms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-17T15:48:06Z) - On the Practicality of Deterministic Epistemic Uncertainty [106.06571981780591]
deterministic uncertainty methods (DUMs) achieve strong performance on detecting out-of-distribution data.
It remains unclear whether DUMs are well calibrated and can seamlessly scale to real-world applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-01T17:59:07Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.