Abundant Intelligence and Deficient Demand: A Macro-Financial Stress Test of Rapid AI Adoption

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.09209v1
• Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2026 05:26:57 GMT
• Title: Abundant Intelligence and Deficient Demand: A Macro-Financial Stress Test of Rapid AI Adoption
• Abstract summary: We identify a distribution-and-contract mismatch: AI-generated abundance coexists with demand deficiency.<n>We derive conditions on the AI capability growth rate, diffusion speed, and reinstatement rate under which the net feedback is self-limiting versus explosive.<n>Because top-quintile earners drive 47--65% of U.S. consumption and face the highest AI exposure, the transmission into private credit and mortgage markets is disproportionate.
• Score: 0.17626455083672685
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: We formalize a macro-financial stress test for rapid AI adoption. Rather than a productivity bust or existential risk, we identify a distribution-and-contract mismatch: AI-generated abundance coexists with demand deficiency because economic institutions are anchored to human cognitive scarcity. Three mechanisms formalize this channel. First, a displacement spiral with competing reinstatement effects: each firm's rational decision to substitute AI for labor reduces aggregate labor income, which reduces aggregate demand, accelerating further AI adoption. We derive conditions on the AI capability growth rate, diffusion speed, and reinstatement rate under which the net feedback is self-limiting versus explosive. Second, Ghost GDP: when AI-generated output substitutes for labor-generated output, monetary velocity declines monotonically in the labor share absent compensating transfers, creating a wedge between measured output and consumption-relevant income. Third, intermediation collapse: AI agents that reduce information frictions compress intermediary margins toward pure logistics costs, triggering repricing across SaaS, payments, consulting, insurance, and financial advisory. Because top-quintile earners drive 47--65\% of U.S.\ consumption and face the highest AI exposure, the transmission into private credit (\$2.5 trillion globally) and mortgage markets (\$13 trillion) is disproportionate. We derive eleven testable predictions with explicit falsification conditions. Calibrated simulations disciplined by FRED time series and BLS occupation-level data quantify conditions under which stable adjustment transitions to explosive crisis.

Related papers

• FinPersona-Bench: A Benchmark for Longitudinal Psychometric Stability of Autonomous Financial Agents [39.00852136756911]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as autonomous financial agents with explicit behavioral mandates.<n>As market context accumulates over long horizons, these mandates gradually lose their behavioral influence.<n>In crash scenarios, the behavioral gap between static agents and those receiving periodic mandate re-grounding grows 4.4x from the first to the final quarter of the simulation.<n>These findings suggest that reliable long-horizon deployment requires selective, mandate-aware re-grounding based on agent profile and market regime.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-30T11:33:29Z)
• Cognitive Debt: AI as Intellectual Leverage and the Dynamics of Systemic Fragility [0.65268245109828]
  We develop a formal theory of cognitive debt, the stock of unverified reasoning obligations that accumulates when individuals use AI as a substitute.<n> Rational agents incur positive cognitive debt because the costs are deferred, partially external, and masked by short-run productivity gains.<n>In a two-type heterogeneous-agent economy, high-cognitive-capital agents adopt AI more intensively and may eventually erode their unaided cognitive capital below that of initially lower-skilled agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-13T03:16:54Z)
• VASO: Formally Verifiable Self-Evolving Skills for Physical AI Agents [57.240036084348354]
  We introduce VASO, a framework for verification-guided self-evolution of robot skill contracts.<n>VASO verifies logically inconsistent skill contracts, then verifies plans induced by the skill against global and local temporal specifications.<n>On Clearpath Jackal and PX4 quadcopter tasks, VASO reaches 97.2% formal-specification compliance using fewer than 100 optimization samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-03T20:02:35Z)
• Economy of Minds: Emerging Multi-Agent Intelligence with Economic Interactions [80.74432115171285]
  We study how a population of agents self-orchestrate and self-adapt into stronger collective intelligence without centralized control.<n>Inspired by Friedrich Hayek's economic theory of decentralized coordination in markets, we study this question through an agent economy in which agents compete via auctions for the right to act, exchange payments, and accumulate wealth from environmental rewards.<n>We show that, with weak agents, the economy produces emergent multi-step reasoning strategies and outperforms stronger monolithic baselines across five agentic tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-01T20:21:09Z)
• From Risk to Rescue: An Agentic Survival Analysis Framework for Liquidation Prevention [46.90931293070464]
  We propose an autonomous agent that perceives risk, simulates counterfactual futures, and executes protocol-faithful interventions to proactively prevent liquidations.<n>We validate our approach using a high-fidelity, protocol-faithful Aave v3 simulator on a cohort of 4,882 high-risk user profiles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-16T03:22:05Z)
• The Novelty Bottleneck: A Framework for Understanding Human Effort Scaling in AI-Assisted Work [4.726153739634646]
  We propose a model of human-AI collaboration that isolates a mechanism we call the novelty bottleneck.<n>The model assumes that tasks decompose into atomic decisions, a fraction $$ of which are "novel"<n>Our contribution is not a proof that human effort must scale linearly, but a framework that identifies the novelty fraction as the key parameter governing AI-assisted productivity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-28T22:50:13Z)
• $χ_{0}$: Resource-Aware Robust Manipulation via Taming Distributional Inconsistencies [40.920885088894174]
  Two sets of dual-arm robots orchestrate garment manipulation, spanning tasks from flattening, folding, to hanging different clothes.<n>$_0$ is a resource-efficient framework with effective modules designated to achieve production-level robustness in robotic manipulation.<n>Experiments validate that $_0$ surpasses the state-of-the-art $_0.5$ in success rate by nearly 250%, with only 20-hour data and 8 A100 GPU.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-09T18:59:45Z)
• Generative AI as a Non-Convex Supply Shock: Market Bifurcation and Welfare Analysis [4.887749221165767]
  We show how the GenAI cost shock reshapes the market into exit AI, and human segments, generating a -class hollow'' output.<n>We conclude that optimal governance must be toward laissez-faire congestion management.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-18T17:00:40Z)
• Impatient Users Confuse AI Agents: High-fidelity Simulations of Human Traits for Testing Agents [58.00130492861884]
  TraitBasis is a lightweight, model-agnostic method for systematically stress testing AI agents.<n>TraitBasis learns directions in activation space corresponding to steerable user traits.<n>We observe on average a 2%-30% performance degradation on $tau$-Trait across frontier models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-06T05:03:57Z)
• Idempotent Equilibrium Analysis of Hybrid Workflow Allocation: A Mathematical Schema for Future Work [0.0]
  Large-scale AI systems are reshaping how work is divided between people and machines.<n>We formalise this reallocation as an iterated task-delegation map and show that the process converges to a stable idempotent equilibrium.<n>We argue that policies which promote "centaur" human-AI teaming can steer the economy toward the welfare-maximising fixed point.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-02T11:28:34Z)
• An AI Capability Threshold for Rent-Funded Universal Basic Income in an AI-Automated Economy [2.6451153531057985]
  We derive the first closed-form condition under which AI capital profits could sustainably finance a universal basic income.<n>We analyze how the AI capability threshold--defined as the productivity level of AI relative to pre-AI automation--varies under different economic scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-24T13:08:13Z)
• Will Neural Scaling Laws Activate Jevons' Paradox in AI Labor Markets? A Time-Varying Elasticity of Substitution (VES) Analysis [0.0]
  We analyze whether neural scaling laws in artificial intelligence will activate Jevons' Paradox in labor markets.<n>We establish analytical conditions under which AI systems transition from complementing to substituting for human labor.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-04T16:55:30Z)
• One-Step Diffusion Policy: Fast Visuomotor Policies via Diffusion Distillation [80.71541671907426]
  OneStep Diffusion Policy (OneDP) is a novel approach that distills knowledge from pre-trained diffusion policies into a single-step action generator. OneDP significantly accelerates response times for robotic control tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-28T17:54:31Z)
• Hype, Sustainability, and the Price of the Bigger-is-Better Paradigm in AI [67.58673784790375]
  We argue that the 'bigger is better' AI paradigm is not only fragile scientifically, but comes with undesirable consequences.<n>First, it is not sustainable, as, despite efficiency improvements, its compute demands increase faster than model performance.<n>Second, it implies focusing on certain problems at the expense of others, leaving aside important applications, e.g. health, education, or the climate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-21T14:43:54Z)
• Inducing Equilibria via Incentives: Simultaneous Design-and-Play Finds Global Optima [114.31577038081026]
  We propose an efficient method that tackles the designer's and agents' problems simultaneously in a single loop. Although the designer does not solve the equilibrium problem repeatedly, it can anticipate the overall influence of the incentives on the agents. We prove that the algorithm converges to the global optima at a sublinear rate for a broad class of games.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-04T06:53:59Z)
• Online Learning of Competitive Equilibria in Exchange Economies [94.24357018178867]
  In economics, the sharing of scarce resources among multiple rational agents is a classical problem. We propose an online learning mechanism to learn agent preferences. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this mechanism through numerical simulations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-11T21:32:17Z)
• VCG Mechanism Design with Unknown Agent Values under Stochastic Bandit Feedback [104.06766271716774]
  We study a multi-round welfare-maximising mechanism design problem in instances where agents do not know their values. We first define three notions of regret for the welfare, the individual utilities of each agent and that of the mechanism. Our framework also provides flexibility to control the pricing scheme so as to trade-off between the agent and seller regrets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-19T18:00:58Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.